Math GPT, just like ChatGPT but with video generation capabilities

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Freemium

People love using similar products but resist paying. You’ll need to either find who will pay or create additional value that’s worth paying for.

Should You Build It?

Build but think about differentiation and monetization.


Your are here

You're entering a space where AI is increasingly being used to generate videos, particularly in the educational and explainer space. The good news is that there's high engagement in this category, which means there is definitely an audience. With 11 similar products, you're facing a competitive market, so differentiation is key. Many users in similar launches were excited about the potential to simplify video creation, but they also noted issues like nonsensical outputs, poor video quality, and technical glitches, indicating that execution matters greatly. Since this falls into the freemium model, you have to offer enough value for free to attract users while also offering premium features that people will pay for. Given the criticisms for similar "MathGPT" products (unfunny humor, potentially harmful/incorrect information), it's imperative you focus on accuracy, clarity and reliability.

Recommendations

  1. Given that you are in a freemium space, start by clearly identifying the core value proposition of your free version. Which users will get the most value from the free product? Understanding this will guide your development and marketing efforts. Since the launch of "MathGPT" had issues around accuracy, prioritize building a highly accurate and reliable core before expanding features.
  2. Since you're offering a Math GPT, consider what specific math problems are the most appropriate and useful to address with video generation (calculus, linear algebra, etc). Focus on those niches and create premium features specifically tailored to solving these problems. For instance, offer step-by-step visual solutions or customizable video outputs.
  3. Instead of a consumer model, explore a B2B angle by catering to teams of educators or tutors rather than individual students. Create team-based collaboration features, analytics, or branding options which will increase the incentive to pay for your product. This could be crucial for scaling in this competitive market, since comments indicate people want to use it but might not want to pay.
  4. Offer personalized help, consulting, or onboarding to paying customers. Many users get lost or overwhelmed in AI-based systems, so providing a human touch can improve retention and justify a premium price point. Given negative feedback about lack of visual step-by-step solutions in other Math GPT tools, make sure you provide that as a feature.
  5. Experiment with different pricing models and tiers. Run A/B tests on small groups of users to see which pricing strategies resonate most effectively. Consider offering usage-based pricing or feature-based tiers, or even a combination of these. Since there are a lot of products with video generation in ChatGPT, look for a different hook.
  6. Address the video quality issues raised in similar products. Invest in high-quality stock footage, animations, and ensure smooth rendering. Poor visuals can quickly turn users away. Perhaps test your video generation on different browsers, as some competitors have experienced issues with specific browsers.
  7. Tackle potential copyright concerns by clearly stating the sources of your stock footage and ensuring that all generated content is copyright-safe. Users in similar AI tools have voiced concerns regarding copyright infringements and legal risks.

Questions

  1. Given the criticism that many AI video tools generate 'nonsensical' videos, how will you ensure that your Math GPT creates videos that are coherent, mathematically accurate, and pedagogically sound?
  2. Considering the potential for Math GPT to provide harmful or incorrect information, what specific validation and quality control measures will you implement to ensure accuracy and prevent the dissemination of misleading content?
  3. Based on the fact that other freemium AI video tools struggled with user accessibility (waitlists, upgrade requirements), how do you plan to balance offering a free version while still creating a compelling incentive for users to upgrade to a paid plan?

Your are here

You're entering a space where AI is increasingly being used to generate videos, particularly in the educational and explainer space. The good news is that there's high engagement in this category, which means there is definitely an audience. With 11 similar products, you're facing a competitive market, so differentiation is key. Many users in similar launches were excited about the potential to simplify video creation, but they also noted issues like nonsensical outputs, poor video quality, and technical glitches, indicating that execution matters greatly. Since this falls into the freemium model, you have to offer enough value for free to attract users while also offering premium features that people will pay for. Given the criticisms for similar "MathGPT" products (unfunny humor, potentially harmful/incorrect information), it's imperative you focus on accuracy, clarity and reliability.

Recommendations

  1. Given that you are in a freemium space, start by clearly identifying the core value proposition of your free version. Which users will get the most value from the free product? Understanding this will guide your development and marketing efforts. Since the launch of "MathGPT" had issues around accuracy, prioritize building a highly accurate and reliable core before expanding features.
  2. Since you're offering a Math GPT, consider what specific math problems are the most appropriate and useful to address with video generation (calculus, linear algebra, etc). Focus on those niches and create premium features specifically tailored to solving these problems. For instance, offer step-by-step visual solutions or customizable video outputs.
  3. Instead of a consumer model, explore a B2B angle by catering to teams of educators or tutors rather than individual students. Create team-based collaboration features, analytics, or branding options which will increase the incentive to pay for your product. This could be crucial for scaling in this competitive market, since comments indicate people want to use it but might not want to pay.
  4. Offer personalized help, consulting, or onboarding to paying customers. Many users get lost or overwhelmed in AI-based systems, so providing a human touch can improve retention and justify a premium price point. Given negative feedback about lack of visual step-by-step solutions in other Math GPT tools, make sure you provide that as a feature.
  5. Experiment with different pricing models and tiers. Run A/B tests on small groups of users to see which pricing strategies resonate most effectively. Consider offering usage-based pricing or feature-based tiers, or even a combination of these. Since there are a lot of products with video generation in ChatGPT, look for a different hook.
  6. Address the video quality issues raised in similar products. Invest in high-quality stock footage, animations, and ensure smooth rendering. Poor visuals can quickly turn users away. Perhaps test your video generation on different browsers, as some competitors have experienced issues with specific browsers.
  7. Tackle potential copyright concerns by clearly stating the sources of your stock footage and ensuring that all generated content is copyright-safe. Users in similar AI tools have voiced concerns regarding copyright infringements and legal risks.

Questions

  1. Given the criticism that many AI video tools generate 'nonsensical' videos, how will you ensure that your Math GPT creates videos that are coherent, mathematically accurate, and pedagogically sound?
  2. Considering the potential for Math GPT to provide harmful or incorrect information, what specific validation and quality control measures will you implement to ensure accuracy and prevent the dissemination of misleading content?
  3. Based on the fact that other freemium AI video tools struggled with user accessibility (waitlists, upgrade requirements), how do you plan to balance offering a free version while still creating a compelling incentive for users to upgrade to a paid plan?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 11
  • Engagement: High
    • Average number of comments: 32
  • Net use signal: 19.7%
    • Positive use signal: 21.2%
    • Negative use signal: 1.5%
  • Net buy signal: -0.2%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.8%
    • Negative buy signal: 1.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

MathGPT – Create math animations for any question

Hi, we're MathGPT! MathGPT creates Khan-Academy-style animated math videos that intuitively explain complex concepts to students, helping them understand how to solve their problems step-by-step. We're currently serving over 2M users, processing 800M tokens / day and growing! If you try it out, we would appreciate feedback on how we can make the overall experience / video generation better! Email me at ygk2[at]cornell.edu.

Users criticized the Show HN product for its attempts at humor being unfunny and the potential for providing harmful information. Technical issues were highlighted, including plot errors, discrepancies between video and text, incorrect calculations, and mispronunciations leading to confusion. The product's educational content was deemed lacking in focus and clarity, with unreliable math solutions and video generation problems. Users also noted errors in plotting and a lack of transparency regarding profit status and the model used. The video's failure to show work was also criticized as reducing its usefulness.


Avatar
84
24
-8.3%
-8.3%
24
84
8.3%
Top