Auto forward message channel, group,user setup rule forward on ...

...telegram

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Minimal Signal

There’s barely any market activity - either because the problem is very niche or not important enough. You’ll need to prove real demand exists before investing significant time.

Should You Build It?

Not yet, validate more.


Your are here

Your idea for automating message forwarding on Telegram falls into the 'Minimal Signal' category. This means there isn't a lot of readily apparent market validation yet. We only found one similar product, "CapyCast - Mass forwarding in Telegram", which shows that this is a niche category. It only garnered one comment, which indicates low engagement. Since the engagement is so low, we don't have enough signal to reliably compute net use or net buy signals. According to our framework, you need to validate demand before sinking significant time and effort into development. Don't worry, this isn't necessarily a bad thing; it just means more upfront validation is needed.

Recommendations

  1. Start by directly engaging with your potential user base. Since you're focusing on Telegram, identify relevant groups and channels where people are already discussing automation, productivity, or community management. Share your idea and ask for feedback on the specific problems they face with message forwarding. Focus on understanding their pain points and needs before building anything.
  2. Offer to manually solve the message forwarding problem for a small group of users (2-3). This is crucial in the 'Minimal Signal' category. Manually setting up forwarding rules and managing the process yourself will give you invaluable insights into the workflow, potential edge cases, and the actual value proposition. This direct experience will inform your product development and validate if this is a real need or just a "nice-to-have".
  3. Create a short, compelling explainer video showcasing the potential benefits of your automated forwarding solution. Focus on the time-saving aspect, improved organization, and any unique features you envision. Track the video's viewership and engagement to gauge initial interest. If people aren't watching the video, they likely won't use the product.
  4. Gauge commitment by asking interested users for a small deposit to join a waiting list. This acts as a filter to separate genuine interest from casual curiosity. The 'CapyCast' product received a single comment saying 'Good project', but that's not enough to justify product development. A paid waiting list is a better indication.
  5. Set a clear timeframe for validation. If you can't find at least five genuinely interested people within 3 weeks who are willing to put down a small deposit, it's a strong signal that the demand isn't there. Be prepared to pivot or reconsider the idea altogether.
  6. Analyze the single similar product 'CapyCast' closely. Understand its features, target audience (if discernible), and any user reviews or feedback available. Look for gaps in their offering or areas where you can differentiate your solution. Since there's only one similar product, it's doubly important to learn from it.

Questions

  1. What specific pain points related to message forwarding are you aiming to solve for Telegram users, and how have you validated that these pain points are widespread and significant enough to warrant a dedicated solution?
  2. Given the low engagement and minimal validation in this category, what is your plan to create a compelling go-to-market strategy that can attract early adopters and generate initial traction for your product?
  3. What are the key differentiators of your automated forwarding solution compared to existing methods or potential workarounds (e.g., manual forwarding, third-party bots), and how will you effectively communicate these differentiators to your target audience?

Your are here

Your idea for automating message forwarding on Telegram falls into the 'Minimal Signal' category. This means there isn't a lot of readily apparent market validation yet. We only found one similar product, "CapyCast - Mass forwarding in Telegram", which shows that this is a niche category. It only garnered one comment, which indicates low engagement. Since the engagement is so low, we don't have enough signal to reliably compute net use or net buy signals. According to our framework, you need to validate demand before sinking significant time and effort into development. Don't worry, this isn't necessarily a bad thing; it just means more upfront validation is needed.

Recommendations

  1. Start by directly engaging with your potential user base. Since you're focusing on Telegram, identify relevant groups and channels where people are already discussing automation, productivity, or community management. Share your idea and ask for feedback on the specific problems they face with message forwarding. Focus on understanding their pain points and needs before building anything.
  2. Offer to manually solve the message forwarding problem for a small group of users (2-3). This is crucial in the 'Minimal Signal' category. Manually setting up forwarding rules and managing the process yourself will give you invaluable insights into the workflow, potential edge cases, and the actual value proposition. This direct experience will inform your product development and validate if this is a real need or just a "nice-to-have".
  3. Create a short, compelling explainer video showcasing the potential benefits of your automated forwarding solution. Focus on the time-saving aspect, improved organization, and any unique features you envision. Track the video's viewership and engagement to gauge initial interest. If people aren't watching the video, they likely won't use the product.
  4. Gauge commitment by asking interested users for a small deposit to join a waiting list. This acts as a filter to separate genuine interest from casual curiosity. The 'CapyCast' product received a single comment saying 'Good project', but that's not enough to justify product development. A paid waiting list is a better indication.
  5. Set a clear timeframe for validation. If you can't find at least five genuinely interested people within 3 weeks who are willing to put down a small deposit, it's a strong signal that the demand isn't there. Be prepared to pivot or reconsider the idea altogether.
  6. Analyze the single similar product 'CapyCast' closely. Understand its features, target audience (if discernible), and any user reviews or feedback available. Look for gaps in their offering or areas where you can differentiate your solution. Since there's only one similar product, it's doubly important to learn from it.

Questions

  1. What specific pain points related to message forwarding are you aiming to solve for Telegram users, and how have you validated that these pain points are widespread and significant enough to warrant a dedicated solution?
  2. Given the low engagement and minimal validation in this category, what is your plan to create a compelling go-to-market strategy that can attract early adopters and generate initial traction for your product?
  3. What are the key differentiators of your automated forwarding solution compared to existing methods or potential workarounds (e.g., manual forwarding, third-party bots), and how will you effectively communicate these differentiators to your target audience?

  • Confidence: Low
    • Number of similar products: 1
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 1
  • Net use signal: 0.0%
    • Positive use signal: 0.0%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Top