Senna it’s a medical tool similar to ChatGPT, the doctors can search ...

...medical tools like scales, dosages and more. In this tool you can write the medical record of the patient and get feedback on important points about the patient and recommendations for the treatment and management

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Run Away

Multiple attempts have failed with clear negative feedback. Continuing down this path would likely waste your time and resources when better opportunities exist elsewhere.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.


Your are here

The idea of Senna, an AI-powered medical tool to assist doctors, falls into a crowded space. There are 22 similar products, which signals high competition. While this indicates a potential market need, it also suggests a higher barrier to entry. The engagement for these types of products is high, averaging 12 comments, suggesting active interest and discussion. However, the lack of positive signals regarding both user intent and purchase intent indicates that many similar products have failed to gain traction. You're in a tough spot, so tread carefully.

Recommendations

  1. Read through the negative comments from the similar product launches to understand the pain points and reasons for rejection. Common criticisms include concerns about data accuracy, AI hallucinations, and privacy/compliance (HIPAA, GDPR). Understand these shortcomings to avoid repeating mistakes.
  2. Talk to at least three doctors who have tried similar AI-based medical tools. Understand their specific needs, frustrations, and what would make such a tool truly valuable in their daily workflow. Don't rely on assumptions; gather direct user feedback.
  3. Consider how your skills and technology could be applied to a related but different problem within the medical field. Are there niche areas or unmet needs where AI could provide a more focused and impactful solution? This could involve focusing on a specific medical specialty or a particular type of patient care.
  4. If you've already started building Senna, evaluate if the underlying technology can be repurposed for a different healthcare application. Perhaps the AI engine could be used for medical coding assistance, drug interaction analysis, or personalized patient education materials.
  5. Explore if Senna can address concerns regarding privacy, data security, and compliance, which were frequently raised in the negative feedback for similar products. Implement robust security measures and transparency in data handling to build user trust.
  6. Carefully select your target audience. Will you initially focus on hospitals, clinics, or individual practitioners? Tailor your messaging and features to resonate with the specific needs of your chosen segment.
  7. Given concerns about AI hallucinations and accuracy, prioritize rigorous testing and validation of Senna's recommendations. Incorporate mechanisms for explainable AI (XAI) to increase transparency and trust in the AI's decision-making process.
  8. Address potential copyright and legal issues related to medical information and AI-generated content. Consult with legal experts to ensure compliance with regulations and prevent future lawsuits.
  9. Apply everything you've learned from analyzing the competitive landscape and gathering user feedback to iterate on Senna's design and features. Focus on creating a product that is not only innovative but also practical, reliable, and trustworthy.

Questions

  1. Given the strong concerns about data accuracy and AI hallucination in the comments of similar products, what specific measures will Senna implement to ensure the reliability and validity of its medical recommendations and prevent the dissemination of incorrect or misleading information?
  2. Considering the sensitivity of patient data and the regulatory requirements of HIPAA and GDPR, how will Senna ensure the privacy and security of patient information, and what steps will be taken to address the concerns raised about data breaches and unauthorized access?
  3. Given the criticisms of existing AI medical tools regarding their impact on the doctor-patient relationship and the potential for deskilling healthcare professionals, how will Senna be designed to complement and enhance the role of physicians, rather than replace them, and what training will be provided to ensure its responsible and effective use?

Your are here

The idea of Senna, an AI-powered medical tool to assist doctors, falls into a crowded space. There are 22 similar products, which signals high competition. While this indicates a potential market need, it also suggests a higher barrier to entry. The engagement for these types of products is high, averaging 12 comments, suggesting active interest and discussion. However, the lack of positive signals regarding both user intent and purchase intent indicates that many similar products have failed to gain traction. You're in a tough spot, so tread carefully.

Recommendations

  1. Read through the negative comments from the similar product launches to understand the pain points and reasons for rejection. Common criticisms include concerns about data accuracy, AI hallucinations, and privacy/compliance (HIPAA, GDPR). Understand these shortcomings to avoid repeating mistakes.
  2. Talk to at least three doctors who have tried similar AI-based medical tools. Understand their specific needs, frustrations, and what would make such a tool truly valuable in their daily workflow. Don't rely on assumptions; gather direct user feedback.
  3. Consider how your skills and technology could be applied to a related but different problem within the medical field. Are there niche areas or unmet needs where AI could provide a more focused and impactful solution? This could involve focusing on a specific medical specialty or a particular type of patient care.
  4. If you've already started building Senna, evaluate if the underlying technology can be repurposed for a different healthcare application. Perhaps the AI engine could be used for medical coding assistance, drug interaction analysis, or personalized patient education materials.
  5. Explore if Senna can address concerns regarding privacy, data security, and compliance, which were frequently raised in the negative feedback for similar products. Implement robust security measures and transparency in data handling to build user trust.
  6. Carefully select your target audience. Will you initially focus on hospitals, clinics, or individual practitioners? Tailor your messaging and features to resonate with the specific needs of your chosen segment.
  7. Given concerns about AI hallucinations and accuracy, prioritize rigorous testing and validation of Senna's recommendations. Incorporate mechanisms for explainable AI (XAI) to increase transparency and trust in the AI's decision-making process.
  8. Address potential copyright and legal issues related to medical information and AI-generated content. Consult with legal experts to ensure compliance with regulations and prevent future lawsuits.
  9. Apply everything you've learned from analyzing the competitive landscape and gathering user feedback to iterate on Senna's design and features. Focus on creating a product that is not only innovative but also practical, reliable, and trustworthy.

Questions

  1. Given the strong concerns about data accuracy and AI hallucination in the comments of similar products, what specific measures will Senna implement to ensure the reliability and validity of its medical recommendations and prevent the dissemination of incorrect or misleading information?
  2. Considering the sensitivity of patient data and the regulatory requirements of HIPAA and GDPR, how will Senna ensure the privacy and security of patient information, and what steps will be taken to address the concerns raised about data breaches and unauthorized access?
  3. Given the criticisms of existing AI medical tools regarding their impact on the doctor-patient relationship and the potential for deskilling healthcare professionals, how will Senna be designed to complement and enhance the role of physicians, rather than replace them, and what training will be provided to ensure its responsible and effective use?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 22
  • Engagement: High
    • Average number of comments: 12
  • Net use signal: -6.5%
    • Positive use signal: 5.8%
    • Negative use signal: 12.3%
  • Net buy signal: -9.9%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.3%
    • Negative buy signal: 10.2%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

MedGPT - AI Medication Guide - Search medicines, treatments & diagnoses with help of AI

Powered by the innovative ChatGPT API, MedGPT acts as your personal doctor, giving you access to a wealth of information on a wide range of medications and health conditions.

The Product Hunt launch received positive feedback and well-wishes for its success. Users highlighted the platform's accurate medication information and personalized AI recommendations, with one user describing it as the best product for long-term medication users. There were also inquiries regarding data accuracy and preventing AI from fabricating information. Overall, users expressed gratitude and acknowledged the solution's usefulness in the healthtech space.

The primary criticism revolves around concerns about data accuracy and the potential for AI to fabricate information. This raises questions about the reliability and trustworthiness of the tool.


Avatar
120
6
16.7%
6
120
16.7%
Relevance

ChatMedical.ai - AI specialized medical agents & professional tools

Integration of Global Search and Local Care. AI Specialized Medical Agents and Professional Tools. Seamless medical consultations and professional collaborations. Real-time AI assistance tailored to various medical specialties.

ChatMedical.ai's Product Hunt launch garnered positive feedback, with users praising its potential to revolutionize healthcare through global search, local care, and AI assistance. The AI integration was highlighted for promising seamless medical consultations, improved efficiency, and enhanced accuracy. There's interest in its application in developing countries, and the team's commitment to addressing this issue was noted. One user, however, suggested a potential future lawsuit. Many congratulated the team on the launch and wished them success.


Avatar
75
9
9
75
Relevance

Chat with GPT about medical issues, get answers from medical literature

Clint is an open-sourced medical information lookup and reasoning tool.Clint enables a user to have an interactive dialogue about medical conditions, symptoms, or simply to ask medical questions. Clint helps connect regular health concerns with complex medical information. It does this by converting colloquial language into medical terms, gathering and understanding information from medical resources, and presenting this information back to the user in an easy-to-understand way.One of the key features of Clint is that its processing is local. It's served using GitHub pages and utilizes the user's OpenAI API key to make requests to directly to GPT. All processing, except for that done by the LLM, happens in the user's browser.I recently had a need to lookup detailed medical information and found myself spending a lot of time translating my understanding into the medical domain, then again trying to comprehend the medical terms. That gave me the idea that this could be a task for an LLM.The result is Clint. It's a proof-of-concept. I currently have no further plans for the tool. If it is useful to you as-is, great! If it is useful only to help share some ideas, that's fine too.

Users are inquiring about the medical literature indexing project and comparing various language models in medical contexts. A nurse appreciates the potential for improved healthcare, while concerns about health anxiety and AI diagnostic failures like Babylon Health are noted. There's curiosity about the AI's name and a critique of the visual presentation. One user seeks reassurance on a personal health issue, and another discusses the need for OpenAI API access payment. Questions about the implications of AI hallucinations are also raised.

Users criticized the Show HN product for unclear code and potential commercial rights issues, concerns about the inclusion of exam questions in training sets, and misleading follow-up questions. Trust issues were noted regarding AI for health advice, and the purpose of being an LLM was questioned. Criticisms also included a sarcastic tone when replaced with a model, a design critique about all-caps, sans-serif font with bad kerning, and the requirement to pay for API access. Some found it funny but only mildly interesting.


Avatar
45
12
8.3%
-16.7%
12
45
25.0%
Relevance

Clint LLM – An Interactive Medical Information and Reasoning Tool

Clint enables a user to have an interactive dialogue about medical conditions, symptoms, or simply to ask medical questions. Clint helps connect regular health concerns with complex medical information. It does this by converting colloquial language into medical terms, gathering and understanding information from medical resources, and presenting this information back to the user in an easy-to-understand way.One of the key features of Clint is that its processing is local. It's served using GitHub pages and utilizes the user's OpenAI API key to make requests to directly to GPT. All processing, except for that done by the LLM, happens in the user's browser.I recently had a need to lookup detailed medical information and found myself spending a lot of time translating my understanding into the medical domain, then again trying to comprehend the medical terms. That gave me the idea that this could be a task for an LLM.The result is Clint. It's a proof-of-concept. I currently have no further plans for the tool. If it is useful to you as-is, great! If it is useful only to help share some ideas, that's fine too.


Avatar
1
1
Relevance

Automating Patient Interview with GPT

This demo collects patient information in an open-ended and conversational format and then writes a preliminary medical note based on patient responses.Many GPT-3 applications focus on GPT answering user queries; here, we flip it around, with the system asking the user instead.I think open-ended conversational question-asking (that maintains long-term coherence, for which we use SNOMED-CT ontology and some rules) is especially important in medicine. Most existing systems rely on multiple-choice questions with a heavy amount of medical reasoning, but that’s very hard to get right. You can’t enumerate all the possible ways a patient can be sick, which is why many doctors begin the patient interview by letting the patient tell their medical story.This is also not supposed to replace doctors. Many emergencies and other complicated medical cases require strong clinical reasoning to collect medical history, which a system like this lacks. Here, we just try to collect some information before the encounter to help contextualize the physician about the patient from the get-go and to empower doctors and nurses to do triage.A couple of notes on the technical side: (1) This is openai dependent (each turn is a variable, but often 3-5 openai calls, if openai is over loaded, this means that the responses can time out). (2) The chatbot session url is a permalink. It can be shared/refreshed/etc. If it times out, you can try to continue the discussion at a later time (just go/refresh the permalink).

Appreciates freedom to express without multiple-choice answers.


Avatar
5
1
1
5
Relevance

Medical Chat - Advanced AI Assistant For Human/Veterinary Healthcare

Medical Chat is an AI platform to assist healthcare professionals in their daily diagnostic work by providing reliable and accurate medical information. As far as we know, it is the most accurate medical question-answering system available for public use.

The general sentiment is positive and congratulatory regarding the Product Hunt launch. Users express excitement and appreciation for the product, with specific mentions of its helpfulness in the medical field. The AI-powered medical chat assistant is well-received for its initiative and functionality. Many users simply state their approval with words such as "Nice" and "Wow..nice."


Avatar
42
8
8
42
Relevance

Using GPT-3 and Whisper to save doctors’ time

Hey HN,We're Alex, Martin and Laurent. We previously founded Wit.ai (W14), which we sold to Facebook in 2015. Since 2019, we've been working on Nabla (https://nabla.com), an intelligent assistant for health practitioners.When GPT-3 was released in 2020, we investigated it's usage in a medical context[0], to mixed results.Since then we’ve kept exploring opportunities at the intersection of healthcare and AI, and noticed that doctors spend am awful lot of time on medical documentation (writing clinical notes, updating their EHR, etc.).Today, we're releasing Nabla Copilot, a Chrome extension generating clinical notes from video consultations, to address this problem.You can try it out, without installation nor sign up, on our demo page: https://nabla.com/copilot-demo/Here’s how it works under the hood:- When a doctor starts a video consultation, our Chrome extension auto-starts itself and listens to the active tab as well as the doctor’s microphone.- We then transcribe the consultation using a fine-tuned version of Whisper. We've trained Whisper with tens of thousands of hours of medical consultation and medical terms recordings, and we have now reached an error rate which is 3× lower than Google's Speech-To-Text.- Once we have the transcript, we feed it to a heavily trained GPT-3, which generates a clinical note.- We finally return the clinical note to the doctor through our Chrome extension, the doctor can copy it to their EHR, and send a version to the patient.This allows doctors to be fully focused on their consultation, and saves them a lot time.Next, we want to make this work for in-person consultation.We also want to extract structured data (in the FHIR standard) from the clinical note, and feed it to the doctor’s EHR so that it is automatically added to the patient's record.Happy to further discuss technical details in comments!---[0]: https://nabla.com/blog/gpt-3/

The Show HN product, likely a healthcare-related AI service, has received mixed feedback. Privacy and compliance with regulations like HIPAA and GDPR are major concerns, with users questioning the product's adherence to these standards and the risks of sharing medical data with third parties. There's also skepticism about the reliability of AI in healthcare, particularly in summarizing medical records. However, some see the potential for reducing doctors' administrative workload and improving patient care. The product's name and privacy policy have also been criticized, and there are calls for more transparency and legal clarity. Positive comments include support for the concept and the benefits of telemedicine tools.

The Show HN product or service has received criticisms focused on privacy concerns, particularly regarding HIPAA and GDPR compliance, and the potential for AI to introduce errors into medical records. Users are skeptical about the accuracy of AI transcriptions and the involvement of third parties, which they find intrusive. There are also concerns about the lack of transparency in privacy policies and certifications. Additionally, users question the product's impact on doctor-patient relationships and the practicality of its implementation in healthcare settings. Some criticisms also touch on the inefficiency of the current medical system and the potential for AI to exacerbate existing issues.


Avatar
117
133
-15.0%
-16.5%
133
117
4.5%
0.8%
Relevance

ChatGPT for Med-School and Healthcare

The comments reflect a mix of concerns and interests regarding the use of AI, particularly in healthcare. Users are worried about the accuracy of ChatGPT in critical areas like healthcare, with specific mentions of hallucinations and the potential for misdiagnosis. There's a call for explainable AI and context verification, with some support from medical professionals. The product is compared to Google, Bard, and BingGPT, and there's a desire for multimodal support and clear privacy policies. Concerns about copyright issues, user engagement, and the target audience are also noted. Some comments suggest improvements or express appreciation for the feedback mechanism.

Users expressed concerns about ChatGPT's hallucinations leading to incorrect medical advice, questioning its reliability and the wisdom of AI making autonomous medical decisions. There were doubts about the legality, compliance, and longevity of provided links, as well as potential copyright lawsuits. Criticisms also included the lack of specific knowledge, multimodal support, and a clear target audience. The product was seen as a magnet for VC money without clear benefits, and there were concerns about the quality of information, reasoning capability, and error distribution of the AI model. Some users found the responses irrelevant or inaccurate, and there were mentions of better existing products and technical issues with the interface.


Avatar
54
59
-6.8%
-8.5%
59
54
6.8%
Relevance

Dr. GPT - Your personal AI Doctor & health assistant

Dr. GPT is a specialized AI assistant designed to help users understand and interpret their health concerns and medical reports. It simplifies complex medical language into easily understandable terms, catering to those who need straightforward explanations.

Users appreciate the app's clear, single responses for health queries, finding it better than WebMD and more accurate than Google searches, which often yield alarming results. The tool's ability to provide clear and confident health information is valued, and users are impressed with Dr. GPT's accuracy. AI integrations in healthcare are seen as a welcome and cool development, with users expressing hope for further improvement.

Users expressed a desire for improved accuracy in future responses, highlighting concerns about the unreliability and potentially alarming nature of health-related search results from Google. The need for more dependable information was emphasized.


Avatar
77
6
66.7%
6
77
66.7%
Relevance

History Helper - AI medical assistant

This AI tool lists possible underlying conditions based on a patient’s description and symptoms. It also assists in efficiently identifying useful follow-up information from reliable sources.

A comment was deleted, suggesting potential issues with the content. Another comment notes that the provided information might be outdated and requires verification. Furthermore, a user suggests that the tool might misinterpret a user's tendency to overthink as a medical issue.

A key criticism is the potential for outdated follow-up information, which could reduce the product's effectiveness over time. Addressing the timeliness and accuracy of updates is essential for maintaining user confidence and product value.


Avatar
10
3
33.3%
3
10
33.3%
Relevance

AI for researching personal health issues

I have some chronic medical conditions, and spend a lot of time asking about different drugs and supplements. Wanted to create a resource that others might get value from. It's trained to always provide citations, and to urge people to see their doctor before making major decisions. Open for feedback.

Users raised concerns about privacy policy gaps and extensive rights granted by terms. A simple prompt was found to bypass safeguards, exposing the API key. Suggestions included a preliminary check for medical requests and creating a custom GPT to avoid hacks. The service worked well but had issues with mixed languages. Questions were asked about the model, training, and weight availability. The service was praised for clear instructions and accuracy but faced demands for open-sourcing. It uses OpenAI models and APIs, with some modifications to ChatGPT.

Users criticized the Show HN product for inadequate privacy policies and data security, with specific concerns about the lack of safeguards and the risks of uploading medical information. The absence of a medical request filter and inability to respond to inappropriate queries were also noted. Additionally, users found the mixed languages on the landing page confusing and some advised open-sourcing the service. There was also a mention that people might not be forthcoming in admitting issues.


Avatar
38
12
-25.0%
-25.0%
12
38
Top