Your are here

Your idea for a Web3 JSON-RPC proxy to prevent phishing and exploitation attacks falls into a category with minimal market signals. This means there isn't a lot of readily apparent demand for this type of solution, and it might be a niche problem or one that people don't yet realize they need to solve. While there are similar products emerging, the overall engagement is low. The good news is that early feedback on similar products indicates positive sentiment toward web3 security platforms, suggesting the idea aligns with the general direction of the market. However, you will need to demonstrate clear demand before committing significant resources to development since this category is classified as 'validate more.'

Recommendations

1. Begin by thoroughly researching existing Web3 security solutions. Understand their strengths and weaknesses to identify potential gaps your proxy could fill. Securr, for example, has received positive feedback as a complete security infrastructure. Consider how your proxy differentiates itself and addresses specific vulnerabilities overlooked by competitors, focusing on the prevention of user-side attacks.
2. Engage directly with potential users in relevant online communities like Web3 developer forums and crypto security groups. Present your idea and gather feedback on its perceived value and potential use cases. Frame your inquiries around the specific pain points users experience related to phishing and exploitation attacks to gauge their willingness to adopt a solution like yours.
3. Offer to manually simulate the protection your proxy would provide for a small group of users (2-3) to demonstrate its effectiveness in real-world scenarios. This could involve monitoring their transactions and flagging potentially malicious activity. This hands-on approach will not only validate your solution but also provide valuable insights into user behavior and potential product improvements.
4. Create a concise explainer video showcasing how your proxy works and the benefits it offers in preventing user-side attacks. Share it across relevant channels and track viewership to assess interest. Focus on simplicity and clarity, highlighting the key features and advantages without getting bogged down in technical jargon.
5. Implement a waiting list with an option for potential users to place a small deposit, signaling their commitment to using your proxy once it's available. This will serve as a concrete measure of demand and provide you with early funding to support development efforts. Clearly communicate the terms and conditions of the deposit, including any refund policies.
6. Based on the similar product discussions, it is worth focusing your pitch on how your proxy can be used in DApps and what security metrics it can provide. That might be a good way to differentiate yourself from similar products, and potentially fill a concrete market gap.

Questions

1. What specific user-side phishing and exploitation attacks does your proxy aim to prevent that are not adequately addressed by existing Web3 security solutions, and how will you measure the effectiveness of your proxy in mitigating these attacks?
2. Given the low initial market signal, what is your plan to generate significant user interest and adoption of your proxy beyond initial pilot users, and what key partnerships or integrations will you pursue to expand your reach within the Web3 ecosystem?
3. Considering the focus on B2B applications observed in similar products, how can your proxy be adapted or enhanced to meet the specific security needs of decentralized applications (DApps) and other enterprise-level Web3 projects, and what pricing model would be most attractive to these types of customers?