an ai powered elections dashboard showing news & updates about ...

...candidates, voting & elections

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.


Your are here

You're entering a crowded space for AI-powered election dashboards, a category we call the 'Swamp' because many similar ideas have struggled to gain traction. We found 8 similar products, suggesting considerable competition. Engagement with these products is low, with an average of only 1 comment per product, indicating that users aren't particularly excited or invested in these solutions. While there's no strong negative feedback in terms of people explicitly saying they wouldn't use or buy similar products, there's also no positive signal. This means most people aren't expressing a desire to use or pay for them either. To succeed, you'll need a really unique angle that addresses the shortcomings of existing tools and offers something fundamentally different.

Recommendations

  1. Given the 'Swamp' category and the low engagement with similar products, your first step should be thorough market research. Delve deep into why existing election dashboards haven't resonated with users. What are their pain points? What are they missing? Consider interviewing potential users to understand their needs and frustrations.
  2. If, after your research, you still believe in your idea, narrow your focus to a specific, underserved group. Instead of aiming for a broad national audience, could you cater to a particular demographic, geographic region, or political affiliation? Specializing can help you build a loyal user base and differentiate yourself from the competition.
  3. Another avenue to explore is building tools for existing election information providers rather than directly competing with them. Can you create an AI-powered add-on or plugin that enhances their services? This could be a more viable path to market and a way to generate revenue without reinventing the wheel. For example, ElectionGPT had criticisms about data sources so perhaps you can help solve that.
  4. Based on the discussion and criticism summaries from similar products, focus on data transparency and accuracy. Users are concerned about the sources of information and potential errors. Be upfront about where your data comes from, and implement rigorous quality control measures to ensure its reliability. This is critical to building trust with your audience.
  5. Consider starting small, perhaps with a focus on local elections in a specific city or county, as suggested by feedback on similar products. This allows you to refine your product, gather user feedback, and build a strong foundation before scaling up to larger, more complex elections.
  6. Explore adjacent problems that might be more promising. Is there a related issue in the election space that's not being adequately addressed? Perhaps you could pivot to focus on voter education, campaign finance reform, or misinformation detection. These areas might offer more opportunities for innovation and impact.

Questions

  1. Considering the low engagement with existing election dashboards, what unique value proposition will your product offer that will compel users to actively use and engage with it?
  2. Given the concerns about data sources and accuracy in similar products, what specific measures will you take to ensure the reliability and transparency of the information presented in your dashboard?
  3. Knowing that similar products have struggled to gain traction, what is your specific go-to-market strategy for reaching your target audience and building a sustainable user base?

Your are here

You're entering a crowded space for AI-powered election dashboards, a category we call the 'Swamp' because many similar ideas have struggled to gain traction. We found 8 similar products, suggesting considerable competition. Engagement with these products is low, with an average of only 1 comment per product, indicating that users aren't particularly excited or invested in these solutions. While there's no strong negative feedback in terms of people explicitly saying they wouldn't use or buy similar products, there's also no positive signal. This means most people aren't expressing a desire to use or pay for them either. To succeed, you'll need a really unique angle that addresses the shortcomings of existing tools and offers something fundamentally different.

Recommendations

  1. Given the 'Swamp' category and the low engagement with similar products, your first step should be thorough market research. Delve deep into why existing election dashboards haven't resonated with users. What are their pain points? What are they missing? Consider interviewing potential users to understand their needs and frustrations.
  2. If, after your research, you still believe in your idea, narrow your focus to a specific, underserved group. Instead of aiming for a broad national audience, could you cater to a particular demographic, geographic region, or political affiliation? Specializing can help you build a loyal user base and differentiate yourself from the competition.
  3. Another avenue to explore is building tools for existing election information providers rather than directly competing with them. Can you create an AI-powered add-on or plugin that enhances their services? This could be a more viable path to market and a way to generate revenue without reinventing the wheel. For example, ElectionGPT had criticisms about data sources so perhaps you can help solve that.
  4. Based on the discussion and criticism summaries from similar products, focus on data transparency and accuracy. Users are concerned about the sources of information and potential errors. Be upfront about where your data comes from, and implement rigorous quality control measures to ensure its reliability. This is critical to building trust with your audience.
  5. Consider starting small, perhaps with a focus on local elections in a specific city or county, as suggested by feedback on similar products. This allows you to refine your product, gather user feedback, and build a strong foundation before scaling up to larger, more complex elections.
  6. Explore adjacent problems that might be more promising. Is there a related issue in the election space that's not being adequately addressed? Perhaps you could pivot to focus on voter education, campaign finance reform, or misinformation detection. These areas might offer more opportunities for innovation and impact.

Questions

  1. Considering the low engagement with existing election dashboards, what unique value proposition will your product offer that will compel users to actively use and engage with it?
  2. Given the concerns about data sources and accuracy in similar products, what specific measures will you take to ensure the reliability and transparency of the information presented in your dashboard?
  3. Knowing that similar products have struggled to gain traction, what is your specific go-to-market strategy for reaching your target audience and building a sustainable user base?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 8
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 1
  • Net use signal: 15.5%
    • Positive use signal: 15.5%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

ElectionGPT – easy-to-consume information about U.S. candidates

13 Oct 2023 Politics

Users have mixed reactions to the product. Some express concerns about data sources and errors, while others find it balanced and are excited about its potential. One user inquires about the creator's approach.

Users criticized the product for not disclosing its data source, which raises safety concerns. Additionally, there were reports of errors and potential downtime.


Avatar
7
4
25.0%
4
7
25.0%
Relevance

AI Election Predictor – Test Your Voting Demographic

I've built an MVP that uses AI to predict voting patterns based on demographic data. You can try it here without signup: https://tinyvotes.com/What it does: - Input parameters like age, gender, state, county, education, and income - AI predicts and classifies voting choice for that demographic - Global counter shows aggregated voting statisticsTech stack: - Frontend: Vite for fast development and optimized builds - Backend: Firebase ecosystem - Firestore for real-time database - Cloud Functions for serverless logic - Cloud Storage for parameter and prediction logging - Firebase Hosting for deployment - AI: Leveraging both Grok and Gemini for predicting and classificationWhy I built this: - Curious about the intersection of AI and political forecasting - Wanted to create a tool that could potentially offer more granular insights than traditional polling - As an immigrant, I'm fascinated by the diverse political landscape of the US - This project helps me (and potentially others) understand the complexity of American demographics and voting patternsSome interesting findings so far: 1. Not everyone in California votes for the Democrats, contrary to popular belief 2. The combination of younger age, female gender, and lower income shows a higher probability of being undecided 3. Most intriguingly, the AI sometimes predicts "undecided" as an outcome, despite not being explicitly prompted with this option. This showcases the LLM's ability to capture nuanced political stances beyond simple binary choices.I'm particularly interested in: 1. How accurate do you think this kind of tool can be? 2. What are the ethical implications of such predictions? 3. How might this impact traditional polling methods?All feedback welcome - on the concept, implementation, or potential use cases.


Avatar
1
1
Relevance

Tl;Dr Voters – Simplifying Democracy with AI Powered Ballot Summaries

Thank you! I'm planning on doing all of CA starting with my city

Users find the idea appealing and suggest focusing on one state initially. The creator plans to start with a city in California and then expand to the entire state. Overall, the feedback is positive.

Users suggest focusing on one state initially to ensure better implementation and effectiveness.


Avatar
5
3
33.3%
3
5
33.3%
Relevance

Building ElectionGPT, a RAG powered chatbot grounded on candidate data

Disclaimer: I am the co-founder of Neum AI, a data processing platform for vector embedding generation and data retrieval for RAG.With the upcoming elections 2024 coming up, we wanted to build a chatbot to allow people to interact with presidential candidates. We wanted the chatbot to be as authentic and unbiased as possible regarding each candidates' perspectives. To do this, we based each candidates KB on their own generated information including tweets, website and government plan. We then sprinkled in generally considered unbiased sources like Wikipedia and Ballotpedia that provide additional context. (Some re-ranking being done in the backend to favor candidate generated data sources) We leveraged our core platform (Neum AI) to consolidate the data into individual indexes for each candidate. These indexes are refreshed daily to pull in any new information. (Ex. latest tweets)You can access the open-source project for the chatbot here: https://github.com/NeumTry/electiongpt-frontend

Users expressed concerns about the product being trained on false information and inquired about the availability of audio/video transcription services.

The primary criticism is that the product or service is perceived to be based on false or misleading information.


Avatar
1
2
2
1
Relevance

Talk to AI clones of 2024 Presidential candidates, and make them debate

Hi HN!This is a project we made at Delphi, the digital cloning company, to help Americans become more informed voters. Personal conversations are the ideal way to learn about candidates and generative AI allows this at scale.The material we've collected for each candidate is quite extensive and varies depending on their public exposure. On average, we have about 100 hours of video and podcast interviews to give us a thorough understanding of their views and communication styles. Additionally, we've archived every tweet they've sent out, which, for some candidates, numbers in the tens of thousands.We've also gone through the entirety of their official websites, meticulously analyzing 'About Me' sections, policy positions, campaign narratives, and blog posts. Some candidates have even written op-eds for various outlets, which we've incorporated into our database.The goal is to cultivate a multifaceted understanding of each candidate, encompassing their public persona, policy positions, and unique communication methods.Today we are launching on Product Hunt and would appreciate your support: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/chat2024Thank you for taking the time to try it out!


Avatar
2
2
Top