Improving AI characters' engagement, visuals, and music.

The Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users expressing excitement about both VideoSDK 3.0 and CharacterSDK. Many congratulated the team, particularly Arjun, and lauded the potential of real-time AI characters for personalized experiences, adaptability, and boosting productivity. Several users highlighted the ease of integration for developers and the impressive Hindi KYC demo. The personalization aspects of the AI assistants were also well-received. Some expressed interest in API access and discussed the impact on customer support. A few comments mentioned the product being promoted too heavily in Slack communities.

Users criticize the product for echoing past AI failures with unfulfilled promises. There's a strong need for tangible, real-world examples demonstrating the AI's capabilities. Concerns are raised about the potential impact of AI characters on customer service, both positive and negative. Negative feedback includes disappointment with queue wait times and accusations of aggressive, spam-like marketing tactics in Slack communities, including irrelevant open-source groups.

ArtHeart AI's Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with many congratulating the team and expressing excitement about the platform's potential for content creation, character design, and monetization of AI creations. Users found the platform fun, impressive, and user-friendly. Several users requested a mobile app and text-to-speech functionality. Some users raised concerns about clarity of the landing page, conversation repetitiveness, and NSFW controls. There were also queries regarding character usage rights, API availability, voice feature implementation, and SSO login.

Users criticized the landing page for lacking clear explanations, examples, and for implementing a login wall. Functionality issues included broken social logins and missing email verification, raising spam concerns. The AI was described as limited, with repetitive conversations and weak NSFW interactions. Suggestions included adding product context to the homepage, focusing the product, and clarifying the character creation process. Concerns were also raised about potential copyright infringement and the absence of a voice feature.

Users are questioning the value of debating philosophy with AI Plato. Some have added case studies to the repository for various use cases. A philosophy student is interested in using the tool for reasoning practice with a specific opponent style.

The main criticisms are that the value proposition of the character AI is unclear and that a separate post for the product may be unnecessary.

Character-2 released with widescreen, vertical support, and quality boost.

The Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising the tool's impressive design, real-time filters, and ease of avatar customization, especially its integration with Canva. Users are excited about the potential of AI avatars for creating engaging videos and improving documentation, user guides. Many congratulated the team on the launch and wished them success. Questions arose regarding AI's voice reproduction, adaptability for unscripted conversations, integration with platforms like Visme, upcoming features, and emotional expression. One comment suggested it was a Heygen clone, another was spam.

Users expressed interest in more diverse avatar styles. A key concern was the tool's adaptability for unscripted conversations, implying a potential limitation in handling spontaneous interactions. Users were also curious about the avatar's ability to capture and convey nuanced emotions, questioning if it goes beyond simply relaying information.

Pipio is a platform praised for its innovative approach to diverse actor representation using AI avatars and digital actors, with many congratulating the platform on its Product Hunt launch. Users highlight its potential for promoting inclusivity in media and find the avatars realistic. Positive experiences are noted, especially after recent updates. However, some users have reported a slow interface and expressed a desire for more diverse avatars. There are also requests to upvote AI projects and questions around audience and influencers.

Users criticized the product launch for performance issues, specifically a slow interface. One user pointed out that avatars have not been updated or expanded.

VEED's Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising the AI avatars as game-changers for content creation, marketing, and explainer videos. Many highlighted the ease of use, time-saving potential, and realistic quality of the avatars. Users also appreciated the variety of languages and dialects offered. Several users congratulated the team on the launch and expressed excitement to try the product, with some already being happy VEED customers. Suggestions included adding noise cancellation, more customization for avatars, and improvements to the free trial.

Users question the product's differentiation from existing solutions like Pieter Levels' version and other AI tools. There are requests for more language support in the demo and concerns about the lack of customization for AI avatars, making it feel impersonal. The free trial's limited text edits were perceived as restrictive, hindering a full demo experience.

Users expressed excitement for the text-to-video product and congratulated the team on the launch, noting its cool features. A suggestion was made to list the product in a directory to improve discoverability. One user pointed out a Shutterstock watermark on the website's first image.

A user criticized the presence of a Shutterstock watermark on the website's first image, suggesting it should be removed.

AI Studios is receiving positive feedback for simplifying video creation using AI-powered avatars, with users congratulating the launch and praising its ease of use, customization, and collaboration features. Several comments highlight its potential for businesses in video marketing and its ability to help introverts create content. Users are also interested in the underlying model, customization options for avatar voice tone, and video-to-video integration capabilities. There's also a note of concern that technological advancements are scary.

The sole criticism expresses a general fear regarding technological advancement, suggesting it evokes a sense of unease or apprehension.

Users find the product interesting but note the lack of an example video on the site for the personalized video product.

Lack of example video.

Lacks information, fails transparency criterion for AI companies.

Not enough information to trust.

The Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users excited about the tool's potential for visual storytelling, personalized content creation, and seeing themselves in various scenarios. Many congratulated the team and praised the product as innovative and a game-changer, especially highlighting the profile picture feature. Some users expressed excitement about becoming anime characters and appreciated the consistent identity feature. However, one user noted that the tool is listed as free but is actually paid.

Users criticized the Product Hunt launch for providing misleading information, specifically regarding the tool's pricing (stated as free when it may not be). The other feedback inquired about accuracy and specific use cases, but they did not register any explicit criticism about the launched product or service.

The Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising the product as awesome, interesting, and the future. Many congratulated the team and expressed excitement to try it out. A user is looking for realistic video generation and mentioned voice as a concern. One user reported an unwanted vertical scroll bar on the landing page in Chrome, and another highlighted the value of trying the product even without a card.

Users criticized the product launch for robotic voice generation. Additionally, the landing page had an unwanted vertical scroll bar.

Users critiqued the animation quality, noting inferior techniques, static images, and awkward movements. There were specific mentions of issues with face adaptation and low-resolution models, as well as a green tint bug. Some comments requested technical details and the ability to export character models, which was deemed not feasible. There were also discussions about AI involvement in storytelling and reviewing, with a call for more human touch. Mixed feedback included praise for costume consistency and progress in character clothing, but also suggestions to focus on improving animation. Technical issues like video playback on iOS Safari and comparisons to other tools and animations were also mentioned.

Users criticized the product for subpar animation, awkward presentation, and technical issues like resolution, face adapter bugs, and iOS compatibility. Comparisons to Corridor Crew were seen as disingenuous. The product was also noted for lacking detail, evidence, STL export options, and human involvement in AI story review. Inconsistencies in costume details and misleading claims were mentioned, along with examples resembling postcards with morphs.