GoodPromo is praised for simplifying landing page and form creation without coding, streamlining lead generation by integrating various services. Users find it easy to use and effective for boosting conversions. A suggestion was made to add more templates/examples to aid new users. One user highlighted GoodPromo's effectiveness in building a waiting list and praised the excellent support received.

The primary criticism is the lack of templates or examples to help new users quickly understand and start using the product effectively. This absence hinders the initial user experience and onboarding process.

Landing Page Generator simplifies creation; feedback and questions are welcome.

Comment flagged for review.

The comments express congratulations on the launch of Earlybee. One comment mentions Earlybee's function in validating ideas and inquires about the idea's origin.

Users are overwhelmingly congratulating Jamie and the team on the launch of Startt, praising its simple onboarding, beautiful and clean design, and ease of use for creating landing pages and capturing emails. Many highlight its time-saving capabilities, especially for indie makers and pre-launch audience building. Positive feedback is given to its usefulness for waitlist creation and lead generation. Some users inquire about customization options (templates, colors, fonts, custom code), integrations with CRMs, feature comparisons with established website builders, and mobile responsiveness. A few users want more features for the free plan. One user shares a past experience of a similar project sunsetting.

Users criticize the lack of dark mode and email marketing integration. The free plan's limited features and unclear differentiation from established website builders are concerns. Some suggest a name change for memorability. Questions arise regarding modification depth, although it's not a high priority. Furthermore, the product's venture scalability is questioned due to its focus on startups, and the product relies too heavily on a demo video for presentation.

Users suggest creating a landing page first to test project traction and emphasize the importance of actual product visibility over clever tricks. There is some skepticism but also acknowledgment of interest from others. It is noted that predicting product success is difficult, and testing features before a full build is recommended.

Users criticized the project for creating a fake landing page, questioning its validity and trustworthiness. They expressed concerns about the difficulty of trusting businesses without a tangible product and were generally suspicious of tools like this. Additionally, there was a concern that developers might be tempted to build unnecessary features.

Error logging in; congratulations on the launch.

Error while logging in.

Users appreciate the simplicity of the landing page builder and its suitability for service businesses and mobile apps. Suggestions for improvements include AI-guided questions for site details and refining image generation prompts. Some users question the product's value over other landing page builders and note the scarcity of tools for creating beautiful landing pages. The product is also seen as nice for satire. External comments and examples were linked.

Users criticized the product for its errors and lack of drag-and-drop functionality, absence of live view, unimpressive landing page, and difficulty in preparing site copy. It was also noted that the service does not aid in differentiation or standing out, lacks tools for creating beautiful landing pages, and requires better prompt refinement for image generation.

The product launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising the website's conciseness and the product's excellence. Many expressed excitement and congratulated the team, with one user specifically highlighting the tool's potential for creating landing pages. An offer to list the app on AI directories was also made to increase visibility. Overall, the launch appears to be well-received.

Users expressed concerns about the landing page, citing a lack of trustworthiness and clarity. Some felt it resembled a ThemeForest boilerplate, and there was a general dislike for the trend of CPU-intensive landing pages.

Users criticized the product for being untrustworthy and having an unclear purpose. They also mentioned excessive use of shadows and an irrelevant demo video. Additionally, it was described as feeling like a generic template and having CPU-intensive landing pages.

Simple but effective idea.

Users expressed excitement and appreciation for the product, highlighting its usefulness and potential for building landing pages. There is anticipation for future developments and wider applicability.

Built DaisyLanding for faster SaaS landing pages.

Doesn't use AI.

Comment is dead.

Users expressed frustration with landing pages, suggesting a focus on building the product instead. They criticized startups for building without a clear idea of benefits. There was an expectation for a designed website, but users were disappointed to find only a text description. Additionally, users noted the lack of available content.

Users criticized the product for being a time sink, lacking a clear idea of benefits, and not delivering the expected output.

The Product Hunt launch received mostly positive feedback, with users praising the ease of website creation and customization. Several users congratulated the team on the launch and wished them success. Questions were raised about design quality and how the builder differentiates itself from existing options. One user reported an AJAX error, while another mentioned a minor issue adding a new section. Overall, users expressed excitement and appreciation for the innovative website creation approach and its speed.

Users questioned the product's differentiation from existing website builders. Several technical issues were reported, including an AJAX error and the failure to add new sections to a page. These functional problems negatively impacted the user experience during the Product Hunt launch.

The Product Hunt launch is congratulated, but concern is raised about limiting the audience to French speakers. The landing page creation is praised for its efficiency and customization, specifically for Swiss businesses.

The primary criticism is that limiting the product to French significantly reduces its potential audience reach and impact. This geographic restriction limits the product's ability to gain traction and wider adoption.