25 May 2025
Developer Tools

An alternative to bit.ly, linktree and gitbook. Cheaper and more ...

...feature rich without ads

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Run Away

Multiple attempts have failed with clear negative feedback. Continuing down this path would likely waste your time and resources when better opportunities exist elsewhere.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.


Your are here

You're entering a crowded space with your idea for a cheaper, more feature-rich alternative to link shorteners like Bit.ly, website builders like Gitbook, and bio link tools like Linktree. Our analysis shows a high number of similar products already exist (n_matches = 8), which indicates significant competition in this space. The engagement level (avg n_comments = 4) is medium, meaning people are somewhat interested in these types of tools. However, without positive signals for use or buying, it's difficult to tell if your target audience is craving something different. Given the number of competitors and the neutral market signals, your idea will likely struggle to gain traction. Be careful and avoid wasting your time, as this idea may not be viable.

Recommendations

  1. Carefully analyze the negative feedback surrounding existing link shortening, website builder and bio link tools. The provided criticism summaries highlight concerns about uniqueness, added value compared to existing solutions (like browser features), and potential legal issues (copyright, link rot). Understand why users find current offerings insufficient and focus on addressing those specific pain points.
  2. Consider if your skill set and proposed feature set could be applied to solve a related, but different, problem. For example, could you pivot to focus on a specific niche within link management, such as a tool tailored for researchers or a platform focused on privacy-conscious link sharing?
  3. If you've already started building the product, evaluate whether the underlying technology can be repurposed for a different application. Perhaps the core architecture could be adapted to a different type of data management or content delivery system, that has less competition.
  4. Talk to at least three people who have actively used Bit.ly, Linktree, and Gitbook to deeply understand their frustrations and unmet needs. Focus on uncovering the 'jobs to be done' that these users are trying to accomplish and identify areas where existing solutions fall short.
  5. Instead of directly competing on price and features, explore differentiation through a unique value proposition. Given the criticism about lack of innovation, focus on providing innovative security or access control mechanisms.
  6. Re-evaluate your assumptions about the market and your target audience. It may be worth doing a survey to check if people actually care about the features you are planning to add and see what they think about the competitors.

Questions

  1. Beyond just being 'cheaper and more feature-rich,' what truly unique value proposition are you offering that competitors like Bit.ly, Linktree, and Gitbook lack, and how will you effectively communicate that to potential users?
  2. Considering the concerns about copyright and link rot associated with similar tools, how will you ensure the long-term viability and legality of the content shared through your platform, and how will you address potential misuse or abuse?
  3. Given the existing competition and the absence of strong positive 'use' or 'buy' signals, what specific marketing and go-to-market strategies will you employ to acquire initial users and demonstrate the value of your platform, and how will you measure their effectiveness?

Your are here

You're entering a crowded space with your idea for a cheaper, more feature-rich alternative to link shorteners like Bit.ly, website builders like Gitbook, and bio link tools like Linktree. Our analysis shows a high number of similar products already exist (n_matches = 8), which indicates significant competition in this space. The engagement level (avg n_comments = 4) is medium, meaning people are somewhat interested in these types of tools. However, without positive signals for use or buying, it's difficult to tell if your target audience is craving something different. Given the number of competitors and the neutral market signals, your idea will likely struggle to gain traction. Be careful and avoid wasting your time, as this idea may not be viable.

Recommendations

  1. Carefully analyze the negative feedback surrounding existing link shortening, website builder and bio link tools. The provided criticism summaries highlight concerns about uniqueness, added value compared to existing solutions (like browser features), and potential legal issues (copyright, link rot). Understand why users find current offerings insufficient and focus on addressing those specific pain points.
  2. Consider if your skill set and proposed feature set could be applied to solve a related, but different, problem. For example, could you pivot to focus on a specific niche within link management, such as a tool tailored for researchers or a platform focused on privacy-conscious link sharing?
  3. If you've already started building the product, evaluate whether the underlying technology can be repurposed for a different application. Perhaps the core architecture could be adapted to a different type of data management or content delivery system, that has less competition.
  4. Talk to at least three people who have actively used Bit.ly, Linktree, and Gitbook to deeply understand their frustrations and unmet needs. Focus on uncovering the 'jobs to be done' that these users are trying to accomplish and identify areas where existing solutions fall short.
  5. Instead of directly competing on price and features, explore differentiation through a unique value proposition. Given the criticism about lack of innovation, focus on providing innovative security or access control mechanisms.
  6. Re-evaluate your assumptions about the market and your target audience. It may be worth doing a survey to check if people actually care about the features you are planning to add and see what they think about the competitors.

Questions

  1. Beyond just being 'cheaper and more feature-rich,' what truly unique value proposition are you offering that competitors like Bit.ly, Linktree, and Gitbook lack, and how will you effectively communicate that to potential users?
  2. Considering the concerns about copyright and link rot associated with similar tools, how will you ensure the long-term viability and legality of the content shared through your platform, and how will you address potential misuse or abuse?
  3. Given the existing competition and the absence of strong positive 'use' or 'buy' signals, what specific marketing and go-to-market strategies will you employ to acquire initial users and demonstrate the value of your platform, and how will you measure their effectiveness?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 8
  • Engagement: Medium
    • Average number of comments: 4
  • Net use signal: -4.7%
    • Positive use signal: 3.6%
    • Negative use signal: 8.3%
  • Net buy signal: -3.3%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 3.3%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

The Open Source Technical Documentation Platform

01 Apr 2023 Developer Tools

We're currently building GitWonk, an open-source self-hosted alternative of GitBook, Confluence, and Archbee.Today, thrilled to announce the launch of our new website: https://gitwonk.com/Please share your thoughts and consider starring us on GitHub: https://github.com/gitwonk/gitwonkFollow us on Twitter for more updates on the public Beta.


Avatar
1
1
Relevance

Git.new – a free GitHub link shortener

Users are discussing a link shortening service with GitHub-specific functionality. Some find it fun to create links with their team on git.new/code, while others are surprised that GitHub doesn't already own this service. Additionally, users mention the availability of gist.new and repo.new, with repo.new being used when the CLI is unavailable.

The product is criticized for being a generic link shortening service, lacking uniqueness or innovation. Additionally, some users believe that GitHub should have developed and owned this service instead.


Avatar
12
5
20.0%
5
12
20.0%
Relevance

Link Book – Quickly save links from around the web to GitHub

12 Feb 2023 Productivity

Save and sync your web bookmarks using Link Book and GitHub while retaining full control of your data

Users are questioning the value of the tool compared to manual saving and existing browser features, with concerns about copyright issues and the legality of saving content. There's interest in features like saving as PDFs and markdown, and reducing permissions required. Suggestions include using public repos to demonstrate the tool, fine-grained access tokens, and creating a GitHub user for contributions. Users are also interested in open-source availability, self-hosting, and extensions for browsers and iPhones. Feedback on app flow, security, and permissions, especially in IoT, is mixed, with some confusion and requests for fewer permissions.

Users expressed concerns about the product's added value, likening it to manual saving and existing browser features. They highlighted potential legal issues, such as copyright infringement and link-rot, making saved links less useful. Criticisms also focused on the app's permissions being too broad and risky, unclear functionality, and lack of self-hosting options. There were also mentions of security concerns, particularly with IoT, and the absence of a browser extension or iPhone app. Some users questioned the necessity of the app and its approach to user contributions and testing details.


Avatar
84
31
-12.9%
-6.5%
31
84
3.2%
Top