Should I Build It Should I Build It
19 Apr 2025
Software Engineering Developer Tools

AI pull request reviewer code programming quality check automatic git

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.

Your are here

The idea of an AI-powered pull request reviewer falls into a crowded space. We found 29 similar products, indicating high competition. This puts your idea in the 'Swamp' category, where many mediocre solutions exist. The engagement with similar products is low, with an average of only 3 comments per product launch. Given the number of competitors and lack of strong engagement, it will be challenging to stand out. While the premise of automating code review is appealing, many have tried and failed to create a truly compelling offering. You'll need a very different approach.

Recommendations

  1. First, dive deep into why existing AI pull request review tools haven't become indispensable. Analyze their shortcomings in terms of accuracy, speed, integration, and cost, as highlighted in the user criticism from the similar products. Understand the pain points that current solutions are not adequately addressing. Don't just build another tool; understand why the current ones aren't working.
  2. If you're still convinced this is the path, niche down to a specific group with very specific needs. For example, focus on a particular programming language (e.g., Rust, Go), a specific type of project (e.g., security audits, performance optimization), or a certain team size (e.g., solo developers, small startups). Focus on specific and poorly-served niches.
  3. Before building a standalone tool, consider creating integrations or plugins for existing platforms like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. This allows you to tap into an existing user base and validate your solution without investing heavily in infrastructure. This would also mitigate security concerns by operating within established trusted environments, and the option to run locally, addressing some of the complaints from competing products.
  4. Explore adjacent problems that might be more promising. Perhaps focus on AI-powered code generation, automated documentation, or intelligent debugging tools. These areas might have less competition and greater potential for innovation. This is a pivot, and it's crucial.
  5. Before investing significant time and resources, conduct thorough user interviews and prototype testing. Get feedback on your core value proposition and identify potential roadblocks early on. The skepticism towards existing tools suggests users are wary of AI hype; demonstrate tangible benefits with concrete examples.
  6. Given the cost concerns raised about existing tools like CodeRabbit (being an expensive ChatGPT wrapper), think carefully about your pricing model. Explore freemium options, usage-based pricing, or tiered plans that cater to different user needs and budgets. Transparency about data handling (as seen in some criticisms), and a more cost-effective approach could set you apart.
  7. Instead of focusing solely on finding bugs, consider features that enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing within development teams. This could include AI-powered explanations of code changes, automated documentation generation, or intelligent suggestions for code improvements. Make your product useful for more than just code quality checks.

Questions

  1. Given the number of existing solutions, what is your 'unfair advantage' that will allow you to not only enter the market but also capture significant market share? What unique data, algorithm, or partnership do you have that others don't?
  2. How will you ensure the accuracy and reliability of your AI-powered code reviews, especially considering the concerns raised about AI providing plausible but incorrect answers? What specific validation and testing strategies will you employ?
  3. Considering the criticism about data handling and privacy, what specific steps will you take to ensure the security and confidentiality of user code, especially for private repositories? How will you communicate these measures transparently to build trust with your users?

Your are here

The idea of an AI-powered pull request reviewer falls into a crowded space. We found 29 similar products, indicating high competition. This puts your idea in the 'Swamp' category, where many mediocre solutions exist. The engagement with similar products is low, with an average of only 3 comments per product launch. Given the number of competitors and lack of strong engagement, it will be challenging to stand out. While the premise of automating code review is appealing, many have tried and failed to create a truly compelling offering. You'll need a very different approach.

Recommendations

  1. First, dive deep into why existing AI pull request review tools haven't become indispensable. Analyze their shortcomings in terms of accuracy, speed, integration, and cost, as highlighted in the user criticism from the similar products. Understand the pain points that current solutions are not adequately addressing. Don't just build another tool; understand why the current ones aren't working.
  2. If you're still convinced this is the path, niche down to a specific group with very specific needs. For example, focus on a particular programming language (e.g., Rust, Go), a specific type of project (e.g., security audits, performance optimization), or a certain team size (e.g., solo developers, small startups). Focus on specific and poorly-served niches.
  3. Before building a standalone tool, consider creating integrations or plugins for existing platforms like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. This allows you to tap into an existing user base and validate your solution without investing heavily in infrastructure. This would also mitigate security concerns by operating within established trusted environments, and the option to run locally, addressing some of the complaints from competing products.
  4. Explore adjacent problems that might be more promising. Perhaps focus on AI-powered code generation, automated documentation, or intelligent debugging tools. These areas might have less competition and greater potential for innovation. This is a pivot, and it's crucial.
  5. Before investing significant time and resources, conduct thorough user interviews and prototype testing. Get feedback on your core value proposition and identify potential roadblocks early on. The skepticism towards existing tools suggests users are wary of AI hype; demonstrate tangible benefits with concrete examples.
  6. Given the cost concerns raised about existing tools like CodeRabbit (being an expensive ChatGPT wrapper), think carefully about your pricing model. Explore freemium options, usage-based pricing, or tiered plans that cater to different user needs and budgets. Transparency about data handling (as seen in some criticisms), and a more cost-effective approach could set you apart.
  7. Instead of focusing solely on finding bugs, consider features that enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing within development teams. This could include AI-powered explanations of code changes, automated documentation generation, or intelligent suggestions for code improvements. Make your product useful for more than just code quality checks.

Questions

  1. Given the number of existing solutions, what is your 'unfair advantage' that will allow you to not only enter the market but also capture significant market share? What unique data, algorithm, or partnership do you have that others don't?
  2. How will you ensure the accuracy and reliability of your AI-powered code reviews, especially considering the concerns raised about AI providing plausible but incorrect answers? What specific validation and testing strategies will you employ?
  3. Considering the criticism about data handling and privacy, what specific steps will you take to ensure the security and confidentiality of user code, especially for private repositories? How will you communicate these measures transparently to build trust with your users?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 29
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 3
  • Net use signal: 22.1%
    • Positive use signal: 25.4%
    • Negative use signal: 3.3%
  • Net buy signal: -1.2%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 1.2%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

AI-driven GitHub PR reviewer

12 Jul 2023 GitHub

Hello HN readers!Our team has built an AI/LLM-driven code review tool that significantly helps improve dev velocity and code quality.Its unique features are:- Line-by-line code change suggestions: Reviews the changes line by line and provides code change suggestions that can be directly committed from the GitHub UI.- Continuous, incremental reviews: Reviews are performed on each commit within a pull request rather than a one-time review on the entire pull request.- Cost-effective and reduced noise: Incremental reviews reduce noise by tracking changed files between commits and the base of the pull request.- Chat with the bot: Supports conversation with the bot in the context of lines of code or entire files, helpful in providing context, generating test cases, and reducing code complexity.- Smart review skipping: By default, skips in-depth review for simple changes (e.g., typo fixes) and when changes look good for the most part.We would love the HN community to try it out in their GitHub repos and provide feedback! We will happily answer any technical questions regarding the sophisticated prompt engineering we did for this project.

Avatar
4
4
Relevance

Open-Source Pull Request AI Reviewer

22 Nov 2024 Artificial Intelligence

Hey HN,Over the last year, I’ve reviewed more than 1000 code changes. Most of the time was spent catching obvious mistakes rather than debating complex design decisions. If we estimate ~10 minutes per review, that’s 160+ hours spent reviewing code in just one year.So I thought: could I get some of that time back using LLMs?That's why I spent the last few weekends building Presubmit.ai, an open-source AI reviewer that runs as a Github Action right when you open a Pull Request. The results so far are promising: I estimate it can reduce the review time by 50%, which in my case would mean I save 80hours (~10 working days) per year.Unlike similar SaaS solutions, the goal is not to replace the human reviewer but to highlight obvious mistakes early, spot security vulnerabilities and give more context about the change. I like to think of it as a “pre-reviewer”.Some of its features are: * Line-by-line comments * PR summarization * Title generation on request * Responds to review commentsIt supports all major LLMs, but I’ve found Anthropic's Claude works best for this use case.Please give it a try and share your feedback!https://github.com/presubmit/ai-reviewer

Avatar
5
5
Relevance

AI/LLM driven GitHub PR reviewer

07 Aug 2023 GitHub Developer Tools

Hello HN readers!Our team has built an AI/LLM-driven code review tool that significantly helps improve dev velocity and code quality. Its unique features are:- Line-by-line code change suggestions: Reviews the changes line by line and provides code change suggestions that can be directly committed from the GitHub UI.- Continuous, incremental reviews: Reviews are performed on each commit within a pull request rather than a one-time review on the entire pull request.- Cost-effective and reduced noise: Incremental reviews reduce noise by tracking changed files between commits and the base of the pull request.- Chat with the bot: Supports conversation with the bot in the context of lines of code or entire files, helpful in providing context, generating test cases, and reducing code complexity.- Smart review skipping: By default, skips in-depth review for simple changes (e.g., typo fixes) and when changes look good for the most part.We would love the HN community to try it out in their GitHub repos and provide feedback!We will happily answer any technical questions regarding the sophisticated prompt engineering we did for this project.

AI-driven code review tool with unique features.

Avatar
2
1
100.0%
1
2
100.0%
Relevance

Review GitHub PRs with AI/LLMs

14 Jul 2023 Artificial Intelligence GitHub Developer Tools

Hello HN readers!Our team has built an AI/LLM-driven code review tool that significantly helps improve dev velocity and code quality.Its unique features are:- Line-by-line code change suggestions: Reviews the changes line by line and provides code change suggestions that can be directly committed from the GitHub UI.- Continuous, incremental reviews: Reviews are performed on each commit within a pull request rather than a one-time review on the entire pull request.- Cost-effective and reduced noise: Incremental reviews reduce noise by tracking changed files between commits and the base of the pull request.- Chat with the bot: Supports conversation with the bot in the context of lines of code or entire files, helpful in providing context, generating test cases, and reducing code complexity.- Smart review skipping: By default, skips in-depth review for simple changes (e.g., typo fixes) and when changes look good for the most part.We would love the HN community to try it out in their GitHub repos and provide feedback! We will happily answer any technical questions regarding the sophisticated prompt engineering we did for this project.

Users have mixed feedback. One user suggests that the image fix is unnecessary as the logic already prevents the bug. Another user finds the product promising but notes that AI PR checks sometimes provide plausible yet incorrect answers.

Users are concerned that the suggested fix might introduce production bugs and that the AI PR checks often provide plausible but incorrect answers.

Avatar
2
2
2
2
Relevance

AI-CodeWise – Transforming Code Reviews with AI-Powered Analysis

10 May 2023 Artificial Intelligence Developer Tools

Say goodbye to slow code reviews! Introducing AI-CodeWise, an AI-powered code reviewer transforming code quality & security. Harness the power of OpenAI API for comprehensive reviews & suggested fixes.We have compared its results with those of existing Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) scanner tools. AI-CodeWise differentiates itself from these tools by offering the following advantages: 1. All-in-One Review: Detects code smells, best practice violations, & security issues across languages for versatile code review. 2. Unforeseen Issue Detection: AI-powered for discovering issues that rule-based systems might miss, ensuring thorough code analysis. 3. Fix Suggestions: Offers code change suggestions directly in PR comments, empowering developers to resolve issues efficiently, boosting code quality & securityWould love to hear your feedback!

Avatar
2
2
Relevance

CodeRabbit:AI-Powered Tool Streamlining Code Reviews

10 Jul 2023 Artificial Intelligence Developer Tools

I'm excited to introduce CodeRabbit, an AI-driven code review platform designed to make the code review process more efficient and interactive. CodeRabbit provides developers with line-by-line, context-aware feedback on their code, highlights crucial code changes, and offers a conversational bot for direct interaction. All suggestions can be committed directly from GitHub.Our goal is to help developers create better code and save valuable time that's often spent on tedious manual code reviews. We're offering a 15-day free trial for anyone interested in checking out CodeRabbit's features. Visit us at coderabbit.ai to learn more.We're keen to hear your thoughts and feedback. How can we make the code review process even better? Thank you!

Comment is dead.

Avatar
3
1
1
3
Relevance

Pull Request Reviewed by LLM

22 Nov 2024 Artificial Intelligence Developer Tools

This year I’ve reviewed more than 1000 code changes. Most of the time was spent catching obvious mistakes rather than debating complex design decisions. If we estimate ~10 minutes per review, that’s 160+ hours spent reviewing code in just one year.So I thought: could I get some of that time back using LLMs?That's why I spent the last few weekends building an LLM-based prereviewer that should take a first pass before the actual human reviewer. The results so far are promising: I estimate it can reduce the review time by 50%, which in my case would mean I save 80hours (~10 working days) per year.Linked above is an example of a PR where I'm testing the AI reviewer and it showcase how it can detect bugs, suggest best practices about token validity, generate summary and title, and even chat with me in review comments.The AI reviewer is a simple Github action that runs everytime I open or synchronize a pull request and you can see the source code at https://github.com/presubmit/ai-reviewer.

Users find PR-Agent great and suggest improvements to reduce context switching for senior engineers. They also recommend an optional dashboard for PRs/issues and the ability to run locally for testing.

Avatar
9
3
33.3%
3
9
33.3%
Relevance

CodeRabbit - Cut code review time & bugs in half using AI

01 Apr 2024 SaaS Productivity Developer Tools

Get automated, AI-powered code reviews that surpass existing tools. It offers real-time collaboration, fine-tunes reviews based on user feedback, and uses a configurable rule engine. Eliminate bugs, ship fast, and let developers focus on big problems.

CodeRabbit is seen as a tool that improves code review, offering insightful comments and easing the review process for contributors. However, one user considers it an expensive ChatGPT wrapper with API integration, noting it's pricier than Linear.

Users criticized the product as being too expensive, especially since it's perceived as a mere wrapper around ChatGPT with API integration. This suggests a lack of unique value proposition for the price point.

Avatar
427
3
0.0%
-33.3%
3
427
33.3%
Relevance

CodeRabbit - Transform your code reviews

10 Jul 2023 SaaS Software Engineering Productivity

CodeRabbit: AI-powered code reviews. Enhances quality, reduces manual work. Provides contextual line-by-line feedback, flags critical changes, facilitates bot interaction, commits directly from GitHub. Try free 15-day trial!

The Product Hunt launch received positive feedback, with users congratulating the team and expressing excitement to use the software. Questions were raised regarding GitHub PR integration, the availability of free accounts for open-source projects, and the number of languages supported. Overall, the launch was well-received, and users expressed support and interest in the product.

Avatar
113
8
25.0%
8
113
25.0%
Relevance

Co-Pilot to Review and Auto-Fix Pull Requests

23 Feb 2024 SaaS Developer Tools

In my last job as a Senior Engineer, I spent about 60% of my time reviewing at least 10 pull requests every day. Here's what I learned:1) As a reviewer, I didn't always have the context of the code changes. Developers often didn't provide clear descriptions of their changes and their impact, leading to multiple clarification calls.2) There was a lot of back-and-forth between the reviewer and developers for fixing best practices violations and edge cases. Security vulnerabilities in PRs were almost never checked.So, PR reviews took a huge amount of time, and still, we saw bugs being pushed into production. This was due to a lack of thorough code checking on every PR, missing code antipatterns, security issues, logic errors, edge cases, documentation drift, and accidental mistakes.Merging the PR without fixing issues leads to more bugs, wasted developer hours, slower development cycles, onboarding delays, and increased tech debt.So, I left my job and built CodeAnt AI, which is a PR reviewer that reviews and auto-fixes issues, bugs, and security vulnerabilities without breaking code logic. We use AI and static analysis to achieve this. We have also built a Code Health dashboard, that enforces clean coding practices across repos and organizations.Get started in 2 mins, with no payment or credit card1) Go to https://github.com/marketplace/codeant-ai. 2) Add your repositories. 3) And the next PR that you will create will have description, line by line review, security scanning, and changelog etc.I would love it if you could try it out and give me some feedback.

Avatar
2
2
Relevance

Pull Request Review Helper - Optimize pull request reviews and focus on what matters most

31 May 2023 Chrome Extensions Developer Tools

This chrome extension helps you automate your pull request reviews. It generates suggestions fore code optimizations and allows you to add comments directly. Using AI we are able to detect the "easy" optimizations allowing you to focus on the important code

The Product Hunt launch received positive feedback and congratulations. Users are excited about the product's potential impact and its automation of pull request reviews. Several commenters expressed interest in trying the product. Some users requested more transparency regarding data handling and processing details, as well as screenshots/videos and information on open-source status, and raised security concerns.

Users expressed concerns about the extension's security, citing potential risks when reading GitHub repositories, especially private ones. The lack of transparency regarding data handling raises concerns about its suitability for sensitive projects. Additionally, some users feel the tool takes too long reviewing pull requests, making it inefficient despite the intended time-saving benefits.

Avatar
68
6
50.0%
6
68
50.0%
Relevance

AI and the Future of Code Reviews

07 Sep 2023 Artificial Intelligence Software Engineering Developer Tools

Hello readers! Our team has built an AI-driven code review tool for GitHub PRs leveraging OpenAI’s gpt-3.5-turbo and gpt-4 models. The tool significantly helps improve dev velocity and code quality.We also wrote a blog post covering our journey to build CodeRabbit, how we worked around AI’s limitations, and our vision to see CodeRabbit as an AI-first developer tools company.Please take a look at it. We will happily answer any technical questions regarding the sophisticated prompt engineering we did for this project.

Avatar
3
3
Relevance

Pullpo.io - Complete code reviews in hours, not days, right from Slack

18 Apr 2024 Software Engineering Productivity Developer Tools

Accelerate your code reviews with AI-powered Slack Channels synchronized in real-time with GitHub.

Pullpo.io is praised as an efficient code review tool that integrates with Slack and GitHub to accelerate workflows and improve developer experience. Users congratulate the launch and compliment its clever name, great video, and excellent landing page. Many find it useful and express interest in trying it, with some planning to use it with their teams. Questions arise about Slack versus GitHub review benefits, team integration, language support, free options, and Bitbucket integration. Some suggest an octopus logo and discuss its usefulness for developers sending code to CTO.

A user questioned the platform's analytics capabilities, specifically inquiring about the availability of data on code review times. This suggests a potential gap in the platform's feature set related to performance measurement and process optimization.

Avatar
449
29
24.1%
29
449
24.1%
Relevance

An automated code review tool using GPT3

28 Feb 2023 Developer Tools

Users have expressed a mix of skepticism and interest in the GPT code review tool. Criticisms include a lack of example code reviews and underwhelming results. However, there's appreciation for its potential to save work on large PHP codebases. Some users have resorted to third-party services for code reviews, and there's a request for sample screenshots. Despite the critiques, there is excitement about trying the tool.

Users criticized the product for poor review quality, verbose and inaccurate suggestions, lack of auto-update functionality for code, concerns over data handling and privacy, and non-functional aspects of GPT review tools.

Avatar
11
6
-16.7%
6
11
16.7%
Relevance

gitStream - Cut cycle time ~60% by automating the code-review process

20 Jun 2023 GitHub Software Engineering Developer Tools

Automatically classify and route your pull requests based on the content of the code. Add estimated review time labels, route PRs to code experts for review, and build custom workflows that flag security and quality risks to maximize developer efficiency.

gitStream's Product Hunt launch received positive feedback, with users excited about its potential to automate code review, reduce bottlenecks, and save time. Many congratulated the team and expressed interest in using the tool. Users requested Bitbucket and Azure DevOps integrations, along with GitHub integration and GPT-based PR reviews. Some beta users plan to implement gitStream in their new companies. Others inquired about target industries and adoption challenges in larger organizations. Overall, the product's time-saving and efficiency-enhancing capabilities were well-received.

Users criticized the product for being closed source, although there are plans to open it up later. A key limitation mentioned was the library's inability to detect CSS rule changes. Concerns were also raised about a broken PR review process, which could hinder contributions. Finally, there were worries about the potential difficulty of getting the product adopted within large organizations.

Avatar
144
13
38.5%
13
144
38.5%
Relevance

GitChat - AI agent for GitHub pull request summaries and chat

12 Sep 2024 Artificial Intelligence Developer Tools

Leverage AI-generated GitHub pull request summaries and real-time chat with AI agents to improve your code and catch bugs faster.

GitChat is generating excitement as a tool to streamline coding workflows. Users praise its AI summaries, real-time chat, and automation of GitHub PR reviews, change logs, and notifications. The tool is considered handy and potentially amazing for developers, especially for automating comment responses. Some users have inquired about language support, notification features, and handling large pull requests. There is also a suggestion to prioritize pull requests based on team preferences to enhance the tool's utility.

The Product Hunt launch received criticism regarding AI accuracy and the extent of user customization options. Users expressed concerns about how precise the AI algorithms are and inquired about future plans for allowing users to tailor the system to their specific needs.

Avatar
48
9
33.3%
9
48
33.3%
Top