Should I Build It Should I Build It
17 Apr 2025
GitHub Developer Tools

Cli Database migration tool that functions as schemas as code

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.

Your are here

Your idea for a CLI database migration tool that functions as schemas as code lands in a crowded space. We've identified 12 similar products, putting you in a highly competitive environment. The overall engagement in this area is low, indicated by the average of 0 comments on similar products. Unfortunately, we don't have buy/use signals to make a more informed decision about the product-market fit for these types of tools, since no one seems to care enough to leave any comments. Considering the 'Swamp' category, which suggests existing solutions haven't captured users' hearts, you should think hard if this is the right idea to pursue. The general recommendation for ideas in the "Swamp" category is 'Don't build it'.

Recommendations

  1. First, deeply investigate why the existing 12 solutions haven't achieved widespread adoption or user love. Analyze their shortcomings, focusing on user experience, ease of integration, and specific pain points they fail to address. A key element here is to read the few discussions and criticisms there are of competing products: for example, users of SchemaFlow didn't like the manual schema generation process, and the users of the Golang CLI tool were concerned about multiple instances running at the same time. This should give you a clue about what not to do.
  2. If you decide to move forward, identify a niche within database migrations that's currently underserved. Are you targeting a specific database type, a particular development workflow, or a certain skill level of user? Focusing your efforts on a niche can help you stand out from the crowd and build a loyal user base.
  3. Instead of creating a standalone tool, explore the possibility of building plugins or extensions for existing database management platforms or frameworks. This approach can give you access to a ready-made audience and reduce the initial development effort. Note that this is a classical "picks and shovels" approach, and it might be more useful than building a new product from scratch.
  4. Before investing significant time and resources, consider evaluating adjacent problems in the software development lifecycle. There might be more pressing needs or less competitive areas where your expertise can have a greater impact. Or there might be an easier problem that lends itself to monetization better.
  5. Given the 'Swamp' category and the competitive landscape, it might be wise to carefully consider other opportunities where your skills and passion can be better utilized. Sometimes, the smartest move is to recognize a challenging environment and redirect your energy towards a more promising endeavor. Don't get emotionally attached to an idea, be willing to kill it if there's no interest.

Questions

  1. What fundamental shift in database migration is your tool offering that existing solutions lack, making it a 'must-have' rather than just another option in a crowded market?
  2. Considering the low engagement with existing database migration tools, how will you generate excitement and build a community around your product to ensure its adoption and long-term success?
  3. Given the potential challenges in monetization, what innovative pricing model or value-added services can you offer to create a sustainable business around your database migration tool?

Your are here

Your idea for a CLI database migration tool that functions as schemas as code lands in a crowded space. We've identified 12 similar products, putting you in a highly competitive environment. The overall engagement in this area is low, indicated by the average of 0 comments on similar products. Unfortunately, we don't have buy/use signals to make a more informed decision about the product-market fit for these types of tools, since no one seems to care enough to leave any comments. Considering the 'Swamp' category, which suggests existing solutions haven't captured users' hearts, you should think hard if this is the right idea to pursue. The general recommendation for ideas in the "Swamp" category is 'Don't build it'.

Recommendations

  1. First, deeply investigate why the existing 12 solutions haven't achieved widespread adoption or user love. Analyze their shortcomings, focusing on user experience, ease of integration, and specific pain points they fail to address. A key element here is to read the few discussions and criticisms there are of competing products: for example, users of SchemaFlow didn't like the manual schema generation process, and the users of the Golang CLI tool were concerned about multiple instances running at the same time. This should give you a clue about what not to do.
  2. If you decide to move forward, identify a niche within database migrations that's currently underserved. Are you targeting a specific database type, a particular development workflow, or a certain skill level of user? Focusing your efforts on a niche can help you stand out from the crowd and build a loyal user base.
  3. Instead of creating a standalone tool, explore the possibility of building plugins or extensions for existing database management platforms or frameworks. This approach can give you access to a ready-made audience and reduce the initial development effort. Note that this is a classical "picks and shovels" approach, and it might be more useful than building a new product from scratch.
  4. Before investing significant time and resources, consider evaluating adjacent problems in the software development lifecycle. There might be more pressing needs or less competitive areas where your expertise can have a greater impact. Or there might be an easier problem that lends itself to monetization better.
  5. Given the 'Swamp' category and the competitive landscape, it might be wise to carefully consider other opportunities where your skills and passion can be better utilized. Sometimes, the smartest move is to recognize a challenging environment and redirect your energy towards a more promising endeavor. Don't get emotionally attached to an idea, be willing to kill it if there's no interest.

Questions

  1. What fundamental shift in database migration is your tool offering that existing solutions lack, making it a 'must-have' rather than just another option in a crowded market?
  2. Considering the low engagement with existing database migration tools, how will you generate excitement and build a community around your product to ensure its adoption and long-term success?
  3. Given the potential challenges in monetization, what innovative pricing model or value-added services can you offer to create a sustainable business around your database migration tool?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 12
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 0
  • Net use signal: -20.0%
    • Positive use signal: 0.0%
    • Negative use signal: 20.0%
  • Net buy signal: -20.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 20.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Tiny Golang CLI tool to manage SQL migrations

27 Oct 2024 GitHub Developer Tools

I didn't want to have ORMs configured just to make database migrations easier to deal with. I love golang's multi platform support and so I made a tiny SQL migration tool, ~800 LOC that will track and migrate your database changes as your application grows in complexity.

Concerns about multiple migrator instances running simultaneously.

Potential issue with multiple migrator instances.

Avatar
1
1
1
1
Relevance

I Made New Golang Database Migration Tool

05 Jun 2024 Developer Tools

Hello HN,I've just released a new migration tool for Go that mimics the functionality of Ruby on Rails migrations. It's designed to help Go developers manage database schema changes with ease.This allows you several benefits:- Write type-safe migrations- Auto down of migrations whenever it's possible- Easy backfill even with business logic because it's Go code- Painless integration with existing schema- sql.DB compatible and driver agnostic (it uses your driver)I have a pretty complete API to manage Postgres schema and I am working on the SQLite one (a little more complicated due to the lack of ALTER TABLE expressions). You can use a non-implemented database, you just will do SQL queries and won't have the benefits of the API.Try it and give me some feedback, I would be happy to know what you think about my project!GitHub: https://github.com/alexisvisco/amigoCheers, Alexis

Avatar
6
6
Relevance

Pgmigrate, modern Postgres migrations CLI

11 Jul 2023 GitHub Developer Tools

Hi HN, pgmigrate is a postgres schema migrations tool that is designed for modern deployment and operations. You can use the CLI or Docker container to manage migrations for projects in any language but if you use Golang it's also available as a library.The github readme has the full explanation, but basically pgmigrate is "migrations done correctly" or "migrations without all the pain in the ass bullshit":* pgmigrate uses postgres advisory locks to make it parallelizable* It doesn't make you think about down migrations — they're not useful and unnecessary and a waste of time* It runs out-of-order migrations* It doesn't error if you and a coworker both commit migrations with the same sequence number* It has ops commands for the rare occasions you need to manually mess with the migrations table state* And it lets you turn schema conflicts into git conflicts by making it easy to dump your schema in a consistent format* Oh, and you can squash migrations, tooI'd love to know what you think, and I hope that I can convince you to try it out. The plan is to charge businesses money for it while keeping it free for personal and open source use, sort of like Orb stack, but keeping the source open.Are there any features you'd like to see added? The main one I've heard people ask for is automatic migration generation via diffing, like migra or skeema, but I'm not convinced it's useful enough to be worth the implementation hassle.

Avatar
2
2
Relevance

DbDeclare – A Python declarative layer for your database

27 Feb 2023 GitHub Developer Tools

Hi HN! I made and just published v0.0.1 of DbDeclare. I use Python a lot, and interact with Postgres a lot. I like using SQLAlchemy, and I love Alembic. Those wonderful tools primarily operate on tables, though, and I often find myself writing custom code to declare what databases, roles, schemas, privileges, etc. I want, and I have a hard time updating them reliably and in a repeatable fashion.That's where DbDeclare aims to help: declare what you want in your cluster (in addition to SQLAlchemy-defined tables and columns) in-code, alongside your tables. There is a lot this can't do yet (thus the v0.0.1), but I think there's a decent foundation here to build on and eventually have really nice features like autogenerating change statements between your in-code definition and what is actually in your database cluster (like Alembic).This is also my first attempt at building an open-source project, so I'm sure there are plenty of mistakes. Please feel free to provide feedback, I'd love to make it better.For what it's worth, I'm aware that you can do some of this at the infrastructure-as-code layer using a tool like Terraform/Pulumi. My personal preference is to have all this sit closer to my tables rather than my infrastructure, so here we are.Anyway, let me know what y'all think. Thanks!

Avatar
3
3
Top