Your are here

Your idea falls into the 'Minimal Signal' category, indicating that there isn't a lot of market validation for your AI-powered procurement orchestration layer. This could mean the problem you're solving is either extremely niche or not perceived as a critical pain point by your target audience. While the lack of similar products (n_matches = 1) means less competition, it also means you need to validate demand before investing heavily. No comments (n_comments = 0) on similar products means that nobody is talking about this idea yet. Given this context, jumping straight into development could be premature. The absence of both positive and negative use and buy signals indicates a neutral stance from the market, meaning there's no clear indication of whether people want to use or buy such a product.

Recommendations

1. First, focus on directly engaging your potential customers: automotive electronics suppliers and critical minerals/refining players. Since there's minimal existing market activity, initiate conversations within their online communities (e.g., industry-specific forums, LinkedIn groups) to introduce your idea and gauge interest. Frame the problem in terms of their specific pain points related to ECN diffs, compliance, and contract auditing.
2. Offer to manually solve the core problem for a small number (2-3) of potential customers. This could involve manually detecting engineering change diffs, assembling compliance packets, or auditing contracts. This allows you to deeply understand their current workflows, quantify the time/cost savings your solution could provide, and gather invaluable feedback to refine your product.
3. Develop a concise explainer video demonstrating how your LLM-powered orchestration layer would address these pain points. Highlight the key benefits: reduced cycle time, rework, and leakage. Track video views and completion rates to gauge initial interest. This video should focus on the ROI of your solution, quantifying the benefits in terms of dollars saved or time reduced.
4. Create a landing page with a detailed description of your solution and its benefits. Offer potential customers the opportunity to join a waiting list by providing a small, refundable deposit. This is a strong signal of commitment and helps you gauge true demand. Make sure the deposit is high enough that people think twice about it, but low enough to not scare them away.
5. Set a clear deadline (e.g., 3 weeks) to find at least 5 genuinely interested individuals willing to join the waiting list. If you fall short of this goal, critically reassess your value proposition, target audience, or go-to-market strategy. It might also indicate that the problem isn't as pressing as you initially thought.
6. Given the complexity of integrating with PLM/ERP/CLM systems, create a detailed integration plan early on. Identify the most common systems used by your target ICPs and focus on building connectors for those first. This will reduce the technical risk and make your solution more attractive to potential customers.

Questions

1. What specific metrics (e.g., cycle time, rework hours, leakage costs) do your target customers currently track to measure the impact of ECNs, compliance requirements, and contract discrepancies? How much do these inefficiencies cost them annually?
2. What are the biggest barriers to adoption for new software solutions within the automotive electronics and critical minerals/refining industries? How can you address these concerns early on to increase your chances of success?
3. Given the lack of existing market validation, what is the riskiest assumption you're making about your target customers' needs or willingness to pay for your solution? What experiments can you run to validate this assumption quickly and cheaply?