Schej's Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback. Users praise its time-saving capabilities, intuitive design, and superior UX compared to alternatives like Calendly, When2Meet and LettuceMeet. Students, club organizers, and even younger siblings find it useful for scheduling meetings, study sessions, and events. Many users highlight its Google Calendar integration and overall simplicity. Several comments congratulate the launch team and commend the product's execution. Some refer to it as life changing, and a default scheduling tool.

Users criticize the product's quality, finding it "still poor" despite improvements. A key concern is convincing users to switch from their current scheduling methods. There's dislike for the product's name, and some feel the features are too basic compared to alternatives like When2meet.

Users find the product handy for scheduling, with a promising start and great UI, but suggest improvements like shorter URLs, better mobile support, timezone and time support, and a simplified light/dark mode switch. Some prefer existing alternatives like Lettucemeet, When2meet, Doodle Poll, and Rally for their features and no account requirement. The term WAYF was confusing for some, and users are looking for a roadmap, source code, and a more efficient LLM-assisted version. Minor issues like error handling and disabling past dates were also mentioned.

Users criticized the product for missing time-related features, such as time specification, timezone support, and the ability to choose times. The UI was described as unappealing and unintuitive, with issues like button placement and a confusing light/dark mode switch. The product was also noted for its barebones functionality, lack of significant differences, and unclear feature impact. Users suggested adding explanations for abbreviations, improving the calendar, and making the product more user-friendly. The presence of UUIDs in URLs and the absence of source code were also mentioned.

The app launch received congratulations and positive feedback, with users finding it cute and appreciating its potential for simplifying planning with friends and collaborative trip planning. The app is seen as a possible solution to the challenges of scheduling group meetups. Key questions and suggestions include concerns about privacy control in shared events and calendars, the desirability of an Apple Watch version, and the benefit of easy import from Google Calendar. Users expressed intrigue and are willing to test and provide further feedback.

Users expressed concerns regarding privacy, specifically asking how the platform handles privacy when sharing plans and managing shared calendars. The specific mechanisms for ensuring user privacy in these collaborative features were not immediately clear.

FestiPlannr is praised as a cool and useful tool that simplifies festival planning, especially for couples and groups. Users appreciate its sleek UI and fast performance, finding it superior to traditional flyers. Suggestions include reminder features for specific events, conflict resolution tools, and new artist discovery options. Some users propose tracking concert attendance to assess artist quality. Questions arise regarding overlapping schedules in groups. There's enthusiasm for the app's potential, with suggestions to engage users on Instagram for events like Outside Lands.

Feedback focuses on feature enhancements rather than direct criticism. Users suggest community submissions for festivals to improve planning and sharing. A recurring theme is the need for better reminders, specifically for groups before stage changes, indicating current limitations in reminder functionality. One user inquired about the product's availability timeline.

The Product Hunt launch of CatchUp garnered positive feedback, with users praising its simplicity, clean UI, and ability to solve a common problem of staying connected with loved ones and organizing events. Users expressed excitement and congratulated the team. Some users inquired about a mobile app and social media integration. One user reported an issue with a blank homepage. Some were unsure of its differentiation compared to tools like Calendly, whereas some found it to be an innovative idea.

Users criticized the Product Hunt launch for an unclear landing page, making it difficult to understand the product's purpose. Additionally, some users reported that the homepage was inaccessible or blank. A notable request was the integration of social media features, which the tool currently lacks.

TimeTabled is receiving positive feedback for its efficient scheduling capabilities, clean interface, and elimination of email back-and-forth. Users appreciate its link-sharing feature and its utility for ad-hoc meetings and finding timetable overlaps. However, some users question its differentiation from existing scheduling tools like When2meet and suggest it might not be a must-have due to the difficulty in changing established scheduling behaviors.

Users question the tool's essential nature and competitive advantage over existing scheduling solutions. There are requests for better handling of recurring events and calendar integration. Users suggested that collaborative features, such as shared timetables for teams, would significantly enhance the tool's utility.

The product is an AI scheduler for team meetings and task management. Users question the need for machine learning over traditional constraint methods and seek clarification on how it differs from Google Calendar.

Users are confused about the necessity of machine learning in the product and find the unique features unclear.

The MVP for managing multiple Calendly links has been created and is seeking feedback. Users find it surprisingly useful for addressing an occasional but annoying problem.

Arrange's Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users congratulating the team and expressing excitement about the product's potential. Users find Arrange helpful for event organization, team coordination, scheduling, and deadline tracking. The practical application for wedding events was specifically noted. There's interest in Google Calendar and Tidycal integration. Some users highlighted its ability to simplify group coaching scheduling and serve as a client dashboard. Others hope to see Arrange adopted by universities and city halls. There is also excitement for progress in calendar features, manually retyping follow ups.

Users criticize the manual effort required for retyping follow-ups. There's frustration regarding the lack of automatic blocking of personal events on work calendars. A desire for broader adoption, particularly by universities and local governments, was also expressed.

Users reported issues with logging in, particularly with Google login on Chromium, though it works on Safari. Additionally, the app was described as clunky and unintuitive.

Users reported issues with Google login, including failures and the workflow not starting. Additionally, the app has an unintuitive workflow and forces account creation for invitations.

Wrong credentials error for demo account.

Error message for demo account.

Great solution, wants to host and review code.

No source code link provided.