Should I Build It Should I Build It
16 Aug 2025
SaaS Productivity

an ai agent system proactively fetching and tracking each business ...

...silos progress and update to break the information silos

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.

Your are here

Your idea of an AI agent system proactively fetching and tracking business silos' progress to break information silos places you in a competitive space, categorized as a 'Swamp.' This means there are existing solutions, but none have truly captured the market's love. With 8 similar products already identified, competition is relatively high. Engagement around these products is low, with an average of 1 comment per product, suggesting a lack of strong user enthusiasm or unmet needs. Given this context, it will be challenging to create a product that truly stands out. The criticism from similar products, mainly that they are redundant for teams already using progress summaries, needs to be taken into serious consideration.

Recommendations

  1. Start by deeply researching why existing 'AI agent' solutions haven't achieved widespread adoption. Understanding their shortcomings—whether it's lack of integration, difficulty of use, inaccuracy, or perceived lack of value—is crucial. Look at why current users see it as redundant if they have other means of progress tracking.
  2. If you decide to proceed, identify a very specific niche or user group that is significantly underserved by current solutions. Generic solutions rarely succeed in crowded markets. Focus on a particular industry, company size, or specific type of information silo that your AI agent can uniquely address.
  3. Instead of directly competing with established players, consider building tools or integrations that enhance their existing platforms. Can you create an AI agent that works within popular project management or communication tools to provide a missing piece of functionality? This may be a faster path to adoption.
  4. Explore adjacent problems that might be more promising. Perhaps the real issue isn't information silos, but data quality, lack of standardization, or poor communication workflows. Could your AI agent address these underlying issues instead?
  5. Given the 'Swamp' categorization, it's prudent to carefully evaluate whether this is the best use of your time and resources. There may be other, more pressing needs in the market that align better with your skills and passion. Don't be afraid to pivot to a different idea entirely.

Questions

  1. What are the specific pain points experienced by businesses regarding information silos that are not adequately addressed by current solutions, and how can your AI agent offer a fundamentally different and more effective approach?
  2. Given the low engagement observed in similar products, how will you ensure that your AI agent becomes an indispensable part of users' daily workflows, and what metrics will you use to measure its long-term adoption and value?
  3. Considering the criticism that similar tools are redundant for teams already utilizing progress summaries, how will your AI agent proactively demonstrate its value and integrate seamlessly with existing tools and workflows to avoid being perceived as an unnecessary add-on?

Your are here

Your idea of an AI agent system proactively fetching and tracking business silos' progress to break information silos places you in a competitive space, categorized as a 'Swamp.' This means there are existing solutions, but none have truly captured the market's love. With 8 similar products already identified, competition is relatively high. Engagement around these products is low, with an average of 1 comment per product, suggesting a lack of strong user enthusiasm or unmet needs. Given this context, it will be challenging to create a product that truly stands out. The criticism from similar products, mainly that they are redundant for teams already using progress summaries, needs to be taken into serious consideration.

Recommendations

  1. Start by deeply researching why existing 'AI agent' solutions haven't achieved widespread adoption. Understanding their shortcomings—whether it's lack of integration, difficulty of use, inaccuracy, or perceived lack of value—is crucial. Look at why current users see it as redundant if they have other means of progress tracking.
  2. If you decide to proceed, identify a very specific niche or user group that is significantly underserved by current solutions. Generic solutions rarely succeed in crowded markets. Focus on a particular industry, company size, or specific type of information silo that your AI agent can uniquely address.
  3. Instead of directly competing with established players, consider building tools or integrations that enhance their existing platforms. Can you create an AI agent that works within popular project management or communication tools to provide a missing piece of functionality? This may be a faster path to adoption.
  4. Explore adjacent problems that might be more promising. Perhaps the real issue isn't information silos, but data quality, lack of standardization, or poor communication workflows. Could your AI agent address these underlying issues instead?
  5. Given the 'Swamp' categorization, it's prudent to carefully evaluate whether this is the best use of your time and resources. There may be other, more pressing needs in the market that align better with your skills and passion. Don't be afraid to pivot to a different idea entirely.

Questions

  1. What are the specific pain points experienced by businesses regarding information silos that are not adequately addressed by current solutions, and how can your AI agent offer a fundamentally different and more effective approach?
  2. Given the low engagement observed in similar products, how will you ensure that your AI agent becomes an indispensable part of users' daily workflows, and what metrics will you use to measure its long-term adoption and value?
  3. Considering the criticism that similar tools are redundant for teams already utilizing progress summaries, how will your AI agent proactively demonstrate its value and integrate seamlessly with existing tools and workflows to avoid being perceived as an unnecessary add-on?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 8
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 1
  • Net use signal: 27.0%
    • Positive use signal: 27.0%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Teamsaver.ai - AI agent to collect daily team updates via email

03 Feb 2025 Artificial Intelligence Productivity Task Management

Teamsaver collects team updates via email every afternoon and delivers a smart summary the next morning. Track where time is spent, celebrate top performers, and monitor team productivity — all without disrupting your team's workflow.

The tool is generally viewed as useful and helpful, especially for small teams lacking progress summaries on other platforms. Users appreciate features like performance tracking. One user highlights the tool's potential to save teams time by providing updates and flagging risks using AI, potentially reducing the need for meetings. Overall, the sentiment is positive, with users expressing thanks and intent to try the product.

The primary criticism is the lack of utility for teams already utilizing progress summaries through other means. Users find it redundant if their existing workflow adequately addresses progress tracking.

Avatar
152
4
75.0%
4
152
75.0%
Relevance

AgentSuite - Custom AI agent building subscription service

07 Nov 2024 Artificial Intelligence Productivity Product Hunt

Our AI experts empower your team to excel with custom-built agents that streamline workflows, boost productivity, and grow with you. Crafted uniquely for your tech stack. Say goodbye to generic or complex setups— we're the only AI solution you'll need!

The Product Hunt launch received positive feedback, with users praising the idea's broad applicability across industries. The user interface was also highlighted as being well-designed and enjoyable to use.

Avatar
18
2
2
18
Top