Users have expressed concerns about Bestfile's security measures, specifically the lack of client-side encryption and the deletion of files after the timeout period. Questions were raised about how Bestfile differentiates itself from existing file storage solutions. In addition, users are curious about the revenue generation model for unlimited storage services like Bestfile, in the context of the current challenging economic climate.

Users expressed concerns regarding security, specifically the absence of client-side encryption and the failure to delete files after the specified timeout. Doubts were raised about the long-term viability and sustainability of the product, questioning how it will survive in the market. Additionally, the business model, particularly the offering of unlimited storage, was viewed with skepticism by some users.

Users commented on DoShare's fast, ad-free file uploads, but noted that many services offer similar features without ads or speed limits. Criticisms include long URLs, extra steps, and questioned reliability, with gofile.io cited as a counterexample. Users inquired about the project's GitHub repo, license, and CLA requirements, expressing a preference for MIT/BSD licenses and a dislike for CLAs, while suggesting AGPL for server tools. There was uncertainty about its design for software and suggestions for using WebRTC for better performance. A hybrid system was proposed as ideal but challenging to implement.

Users criticized the Show HN product for its 200MB file size cap and lack of file type flexibility. They noted long URLs and cumbersome extra steps, questioning the reliability of claims, and unfavorably compared it to gofile.io. The product was also said to lack clear explanations for its use and missing license information. Users expressed discomfort with the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) and its empowerment of maintainers. Criticisms included that it's not designed for software, has poor performance, and that its hybrid system is complex to implement.

Straightforward file sharing praised for its ease of use.

Comment Deleted

The launch was met with congratulations, with users appreciating the absence of size limits and account requirements. However, some users raised questions regarding the security of a specific feature or aspect mentioned in the launch.

Users expressed concerns regarding security and privacy, particularly during serverless peer-to-peer transfers. Doubts were raised about the overall security of the product/service.

Users expressed concerns about security, particularly regarding personal data collection, encryption, and trust in servers for file transfers. There's debate over the security of web apps versus native apps, with some citing app stores as authenticity checks. Trust issues with app developers and stores like Apple and Google were noted. The use of WebRTC and P2P technology was discussed, with questions about serverless functionality and NAT traversal. Some users recommended alternatives like e2ee.js, Magic Wormhole, and Syncthing for secure file sharing. The project's open-source status and compatibility with various platforms, including iOS, were also points of interest. There were mixed opinions on Telegram's encryption. Overall, there's a mix of skepticism and interest in the project's approach to privacy and security.

The product has been criticized for inadequate security explanations, particularly regarding encryption and peer authentication. Users are concerned about centralized servers potentially compromising data and the limitations of web apps in terms of verification and encryption. Trust issues with app modification by Apple and Google, as well as the vulnerability of mobile platforms, were noted. The necessity of the product over existing solutions, keeping source code private, and the lack of open-source credentials were also questioned. Additionally, there were concerns about compatibility with iOS and Android, bugs, and the lack of end-to-end encryption.

Users have mixed opinions about the product. Some prefer Pairdrop and suggest adding more features, while others appreciate the fun of building tools without concern. There are also technical discussions about the use of LAN over FTP and the fallback to websockets.

The product lacks features and some users prefer using FTP over LAN for file transfers.

Users are enthusiastic about the file-sharing tool. One user is eager to recommend the tool due to its ease of use. A suggestion was made to include password protection for shared files in a future update to enhance security.

Created app to manage and send files easily.

Praises Cloudflare workers' power

The product launch on Product Hunt has been well-received. Users express positive sentiment, finding the project interesting and useful. One user specifically loves the core concept of sending text messages and congratulates the team on the launch of NeighborHoodShare.

ProjectSend is praised for its ease of use and free availability, making it a great tool for sharing deliverables. Users highlight its simplicity and security, with one user having used it for six years. The launch is congratulated, with some users expressing interest in trying it out. Security is a key concern, with specific inquiries about the type of security implemented.