Should I Build It Should I Build It
06 Sep 2025
Education

I am building an online tutoring marketplace for UK university ...

...students with disabilities. It will have two parts: (1) a DSA-funded section where students select approved tutors linked to their assigned NMH supplier (e.g., UMO, Clear Links, Randstad), with suppliers invoicing Student Finance England, and (2) a private-pay section with subject-specific tutors experienced in SEN. Please identify existing platforms in the UK or globally with similar models, explain their business approach, strengths and weaknesses, and assess whether there is market demand and space for differentiation.

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Minimal Signal

There’s barely any market activity - either because the problem is very niche or not important enough. You’ll need to prove real demand exists before investing significant time.

Should You Build It?

Not yet, validate more.

Your are here

You're entering a market that our data suggests has minimal existing activity. With only two similar products found, including a special education job board and an on-demand tutoring service, there's a low level of confidence in predicting market behavior for your online tutoring marketplace tailored to UK university students with disabilities. The low average number of comments (2) on similar products indicates low engagement, so you'll need to work hard to generate buzz. Because we could not detect use or buy signals from the very limited prior engagement data, this suggests the market is largely untested and it will be up to you to prove that a demand exists for this specific offering. Basically, you're venturing into largely uncharted territory, so proceed with caution and a heavy emphasis on validation before scaling.

Recommendations

  1. Begin by thoroughly researching existing tutoring platforms in the UK that cater to students with disabilities, such as MyTutor, UK Tutors, or Tutorful. Focus on understanding how they address the DSA-funded market and private-pay students with SEN. Map out their strengths and weaknesses in terms of tutor quality, subject coverage, pricing models, and accessibility features.
  2. Engage directly with Disability Services at several UK universities. Inquire about their current processes for connecting students with disabilities to tutors, the challenges they face, and their interest in a platform like yours. Gather feedback on your proposed two-part model (DSA-funded and private-pay) and pricing structures. Use their feedback to validate the demand for the platform.
  3. Given the concerns about pricing models raised in the Corgi example, experiment with different pricing strategies. Offer a range of options, including per-hour rates, package deals, and subscription models. Consider offering volume discounts, especially for DSA-funded students who may require ongoing support. Clearly communicate the pricing structure and value proposition to alleviate anxiety.
  4. Create a minimum viable product (MVP) focusing on a specific subject area (e.g., math, English) and a small group of tutors experienced in SEN. Offer this MVP to a select group of students with disabilities through university partnerships. Gather feedback on tutor quality, platform usability, and overall satisfaction. Refine the platform based on this initial feedback.
  5. Develop a content strategy focused on creating helpful resources for students with disabilities. Produce blog posts, guides, and videos on topics such as study skills, assistive technology, and navigating the DSA funding process. Optimize this content for search engines to attract organic traffic and establish your platform as a trusted resource.
  6. Since you're serving a potentially vulnerable population, prioritize safety and quality assurance. Implement a rigorous tutor vetting process, including background checks, qualifications verification, and student reviews. Establish clear guidelines for tutor conduct and conflict resolution. Ensure that the platform complies with all relevant data protection and privacy regulations.
  7. Based on the low engagement metrics for similar ideas, focus on targeted marketing. Create content that is highly relevant to students with disabilities and the DSA funding process. Promote it directly via disability services, on campus groups or online communities and forums. Track and measure signups to see which channels are the most productive.

Questions

  1. How can you guarantee a consistent level of tutor quality across both the DSA-funded and private-pay sections of your platform, and what measures will you implement to address potential discrepancies in tutor experience and qualifications?
  2. Considering the existing DSA-funded tutor arrangements through NMH suppliers, what specific value proposition will entice both students and suppliers to switch to your platform, and how will you navigate any potential contractual or administrative hurdles?
  3. Given the sensitivity of working with students with disabilities, how will you ensure that your platform is fully accessible and inclusive, catering to a wide range of learning needs and preferences, and what accommodations will you provide for students with specific sensory or cognitive impairments?

Your are here

You're entering a market that our data suggests has minimal existing activity. With only two similar products found, including a special education job board and an on-demand tutoring service, there's a low level of confidence in predicting market behavior for your online tutoring marketplace tailored to UK university students with disabilities. The low average number of comments (2) on similar products indicates low engagement, so you'll need to work hard to generate buzz. Because we could not detect use or buy signals from the very limited prior engagement data, this suggests the market is largely untested and it will be up to you to prove that a demand exists for this specific offering. Basically, you're venturing into largely uncharted territory, so proceed with caution and a heavy emphasis on validation before scaling.

Recommendations

  1. Begin by thoroughly researching existing tutoring platforms in the UK that cater to students with disabilities, such as MyTutor, UK Tutors, or Tutorful. Focus on understanding how they address the DSA-funded market and private-pay students with SEN. Map out their strengths and weaknesses in terms of tutor quality, subject coverage, pricing models, and accessibility features.
  2. Engage directly with Disability Services at several UK universities. Inquire about their current processes for connecting students with disabilities to tutors, the challenges they face, and their interest in a platform like yours. Gather feedback on your proposed two-part model (DSA-funded and private-pay) and pricing structures. Use their feedback to validate the demand for the platform.
  3. Given the concerns about pricing models raised in the Corgi example, experiment with different pricing strategies. Offer a range of options, including per-hour rates, package deals, and subscription models. Consider offering volume discounts, especially for DSA-funded students who may require ongoing support. Clearly communicate the pricing structure and value proposition to alleviate anxiety.
  4. Create a minimum viable product (MVP) focusing on a specific subject area (e.g., math, English) and a small group of tutors experienced in SEN. Offer this MVP to a select group of students with disabilities through university partnerships. Gather feedback on tutor quality, platform usability, and overall satisfaction. Refine the platform based on this initial feedback.
  5. Develop a content strategy focused on creating helpful resources for students with disabilities. Produce blog posts, guides, and videos on topics such as study skills, assistive technology, and navigating the DSA funding process. Optimize this content for search engines to attract organic traffic and establish your platform as a trusted resource.
  6. Since you're serving a potentially vulnerable population, prioritize safety and quality assurance. Implement a rigorous tutor vetting process, including background checks, qualifications verification, and student reviews. Establish clear guidelines for tutor conduct and conflict resolution. Ensure that the platform complies with all relevant data protection and privacy regulations.
  7. Based on the low engagement metrics for similar ideas, focus on targeted marketing. Create content that is highly relevant to students with disabilities and the DSA funding process. Promote it directly via disability services, on campus groups or online communities and forums. Track and measure signups to see which channels are the most productive.

Questions

  1. How can you guarantee a consistent level of tutor quality across both the DSA-funded and private-pay sections of your platform, and what measures will you implement to address potential discrepancies in tutor experience and qualifications?
  2. Considering the existing DSA-funded tutor arrangements through NMH suppliers, what specific value proposition will entice both students and suppliers to switch to your platform, and how will you navigate any potential contractual or administrative hurdles?
  3. Given the sensitivity of working with students with disabilities, how will you ensure that your platform is fully accessible and inclusive, catering to a wide range of learning needs and preferences, and what accommodations will you provide for students with specific sensory or cognitive impairments?

  • Confidence: Low
    • Number of similar products: 2
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 2
  • Net use signal: -16.0%
    • Positive use signal: 0.0%
    • Negative use signal: 16.0%
  • Net buy signal: -32.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 32.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Corgi – on-demand, 1-on-1 tutoring

22 Sep 2023 Online Learning

Hey all — I’m Sameer, a software engineer and longtime math/CS tutor who’s just launched an on-demand tutoring platform called Corgi. The product is a mobile app (currently iOS only) that allows users to request and receive tutoring help whenever they want it, for as little or as long as they need.Here’s how it works:1. User selects a subject, adds a brief summary of what they need help with, and submits their request2. All tutors who are online and qualified in that subject receive a notification that someone needs help3. The first tutor to accept the request gets matched with the user, and both parties are placed in a in-app video chat session4. The user works with the tutor for as long as they need5. When the session is complete, the user is charged for the time they used (currently billed at $1/minute, rounded to the nearest minute) and the tutor receives 80% of the student feeAs a starting point, the only subject we’re offering is SAT math help, but we plan to expand to other subjects in the near future.I built Corgi because 1) tutoring is a lifelong passion of mine, and 2) I haven’t found a quality, on-demand tutoring service that currently exists, but I believe it’s something that could really help students. The idea here isn’t to try and replace the traditional tutoring model (i.e. working with the same tutor on a consistent basis over a long period of time) but to supplement existing resources with an office hours-like service that can provide immediate help (e.g. at the exact moment when someone is struggling with homework, or is studying for an imminent exam).Eventually, I’d like to offer this platform directly to schools or districts, so that students can use it irrespective of ability to pay. There is at least one major player in this space doing something similar (https://paper.co) but from my own research they seem to have a lot of issues (e.g. students getting matched with tutors who aren’t qualified in their subjects, tutors working with many students simultaneously despite the company claiming the tutoring is all 1-on-1) and districts who previously signed contracts with them don’t seem keen on continuing their relationships (https://www.chalkbeat.org/2023/9/6/23861330/online-tutoring-...).I’ve also been a tutor on some of the existing traditional tutoring platforms (e.g. Wyzant) and have found the experience frustrating (mainly due to unfairly low compensation combined with a struggle to match with students). My goal with Corgi is to build something that provides real value and a positive experience for both the tutors and students who use it.I’ve spent the last week or so recruiting an initial batch of tutors, and am now kicking off the process of finding students to help test it out. I’m also building out some additional features to help make the actual tutoring sessions feel a little smoother (e.g. browser-based sessions to allow usage from any device, virtual whiteboards for easier collaboration). I’d appreciate any and all feedback the HN community has to share, positive or negative!

Users have mixed opinions on the pricing model, with some finding it reasonable for several subjects, while others suggest alternatives and volume discounts. There is also a request to allow non-math tutors to sign up.

Users expressed concerns about the per minute pricing model causing anxiety. The service is limited to math tutors only, which restricts its usefulness. Additionally, the $60 per hour rate is considered high, especially given the potential for variable quality.

Avatar
3
4
-25.0%
-50.0%
4
3
Top