Hey all — I’m Sameer, a software engineer and longtime math/CS tutor who’s just launched an on-demand tutoring platform called Corgi. The product is a mobile app (currently iOS only) that allows users to request and receive tutoring help whenever they want it, for as little or as long as they need.Here’s how it works:1. User selects a subject, adds a brief summary of what they need help with, and submits their request2. All tutors who are online and qualified in that subject receive a notification that someone needs help3. The first tutor to accept the request gets matched with the user, and both parties are placed in a in-app video chat session4. The user works with the tutor for as long as they need5. When the session is complete, the user is charged for the time they used (currently billed at $1/minute, rounded to the nearest minute) and the tutor receives 80% of the student feeAs a starting point, the only subject we’re offering is SAT math help, but we plan to expand to other subjects in the near future.I built Corgi because 1) tutoring is a lifelong passion of mine, and 2) I haven’t found a quality, on-demand tutoring service that currently exists, but I believe it’s something that could really help students. The idea here isn’t to try and replace the traditional tutoring model (i.e. working with the same tutor on a consistent basis over a long period of time) but to supplement existing resources with an office hours-like service that can provide immediate help (e.g. at the exact moment when someone is struggling with homework, or is studying for an imminent exam).Eventually, I’d like to offer this platform directly to schools or districts, so that students can use it irrespective of ability to pay. There is at least one major player in this space doing something similar (https://paper.co) but from my own research they seem to have a lot of issues (e.g. students getting matched with tutors who aren’t qualified in their subjects, tutors working with many students simultaneously despite the company claiming the tutoring is all 1-on-1) and districts who previously signed contracts with them don’t seem keen on continuing their relationships (https://www.chalkbeat.org/2023/9/6/23861330/online-tutoring-...).I’ve also been a tutor on some of the existing traditional tutoring platforms (e.g. Wyzant) and have found the experience frustrating (mainly due to unfairly low compensation combined with a struggle to match with students). My goal with Corgi is to build something that provides real value and a positive experience for both the tutors and students who use it.I’ve spent the last week or so recruiting an initial batch of tutors, and am now kicking off the process of finding students to help test it out. I’m also building out some additional features to help make the actual tutoring sessions feel a little smoother (e.g. browser-based sessions to allow usage from any device, virtual whiteboards for easier collaboration). I’d appreciate any and all feedback the HN community has to share, positive or negative!
Users have mixed opinions on the pricing model, with some finding it reasonable for several subjects, while others suggest alternatives and volume discounts. There is also a request to allow non-math tutors to sign up.
Users expressed concerns about the per minute pricing model causing anxiety. The service is limited to math tutors only, which restricts its usefulness. Additionally, the $60 per hour rate is considered high, especially given the potential for variable quality.
