Should I Build It Should I Build It
24 Mar 2025
Events Meetings

A platform for creating interactive virtual conferences and events, ...

...incorporating features such as virtual networking lounges, live Q&A sessions, and gamified challenges to enhance attendee engagement.

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.

Your are here

Your idea for an interactive virtual conference platform tackles a known need: making online events more engaging. However, you're stepping into what we call a 'Swamp' category. We found 17 similar products, indicating extremely high competition. This space is crowded with existing solutions, many focusing on elements like Q&A, polling, or virtual spaces. The low average engagement (around 3 comments per launch) and neutral use/buy signals for these similar products suggest that while many have tried, none have truly captured widespread excitement or solved the core problem definitively. Users often criticize existing online events as boring or disorganized, even with interactive tools. To succeed here, simply adding features like virtual lounges or gamification isn't enough; you need a fundamentally different approach or a very specific, underserved niche to stand out from the crowd. Proceeding without a truly unique value proposition in this saturated market is highly risky.

Recommendations

  1. Deeply investigate why the 17+ existing solutions haven't achieved breakout success or solved the engagement puzzle. Analyze competitor feedback – why are platforms like Pigeonhole Live praised for some features but virtual events overall still criticized as 'disorganized' or 'boring'? What specific user pains remain unaddressed despite features like Q&A, polls, and virtual spaces?
  2. Resist building a general platform initially. Identify a hyper-specific, underserved niche. Could you focus exclusively on highly technical developer conferences needing integrated coding environments? Or virtual academic events requiring sophisticated poster session interactions? Validate that this niche finds all current solutions inadequate.
  3. Given the intense competition and 'Swamp' market conditions, critically evaluate if building another full platform is the best path. Could your unique interactive elements (perhaps advanced gamification AI or a novel networking approach) be developed as a feature add-on or API service to be licensed to existing major event platforms? This could be a less risky path to market.
  4. Your core value is 'interactivity'. Don't assume all interactive features are equally valued. Conduct rigorous validation (interviews, surveys, landing page tests) specifically asking potential customers (event organizers in your target niche) to rank the importance of virtual networking lounges, live Q&A, specific gamification types, etc., and crucially, determine their willingness to pay for these specific enhancements over basic solutions.
  5. Learn from competitor critiques regarding usability and moderation (e.g., Babbble needing content control, Fluo's confusing signup). Ensure your platform, especially with potentially novel interactive features, has an incredibly intuitive user interface and robust moderation tools from day one. Complexity or poor moderation can negate engagement benefits.
  6. Map out the entire competitive landscape, not just direct virtual event platforms. Consider adjacent tools for community building (like TheirCircle), meeting engagement (like MeetingPulse), and even niche communication tools. Understand how event organizers currently 'hack' solutions together and where the true friction lies.

Questions

  1. With 17+ competitors in this 'Swamp', what is the single, specific, and provable reason an event organizer would abandon their current tools (even well-liked ones like Pigeonhole Live for specific features) and pay for your platform, overcoming the high switching costs and market noise?
  2. How will your specific combination of virtual lounges, Q&A, and gamification fundamentally address the core user criticisms of virtual events being 'boring' and 'disorganized' in a way that demonstrably improves attendee satisfaction and provides clear ROI for the organizer, beyond what existing point solutions offer?
  3. Instead of broad appeal, which highly specific niche market (e.g., internal corporate training events, scientific research symposia, large-scale non-profit fundraisers) finds current virtual event platforms completely inadequate for their unique interactive needs, and how have you validated their willingness to pay a premium for your tailored solution?

Your are here

Your idea for an interactive virtual conference platform tackles a known need: making online events more engaging. However, you're stepping into what we call a 'Swamp' category. We found 17 similar products, indicating extremely high competition. This space is crowded with existing solutions, many focusing on elements like Q&A, polling, or virtual spaces. The low average engagement (around 3 comments per launch) and neutral use/buy signals for these similar products suggest that while many have tried, none have truly captured widespread excitement or solved the core problem definitively. Users often criticize existing online events as boring or disorganized, even with interactive tools. To succeed here, simply adding features like virtual lounges or gamification isn't enough; you need a fundamentally different approach or a very specific, underserved niche to stand out from the crowd. Proceeding without a truly unique value proposition in this saturated market is highly risky.

Recommendations

  1. Deeply investigate why the 17+ existing solutions haven't achieved breakout success or solved the engagement puzzle. Analyze competitor feedback – why are platforms like Pigeonhole Live praised for some features but virtual events overall still criticized as 'disorganized' or 'boring'? What specific user pains remain unaddressed despite features like Q&A, polls, and virtual spaces?
  2. Resist building a general platform initially. Identify a hyper-specific, underserved niche. Could you focus exclusively on highly technical developer conferences needing integrated coding environments? Or virtual academic events requiring sophisticated poster session interactions? Validate that this niche finds all current solutions inadequate.
  3. Given the intense competition and 'Swamp' market conditions, critically evaluate if building another full platform is the best path. Could your unique interactive elements (perhaps advanced gamification AI or a novel networking approach) be developed as a feature add-on or API service to be licensed to existing major event platforms? This could be a less risky path to market.
  4. Your core value is 'interactivity'. Don't assume all interactive features are equally valued. Conduct rigorous validation (interviews, surveys, landing page tests) specifically asking potential customers (event organizers in your target niche) to rank the importance of virtual networking lounges, live Q&A, specific gamification types, etc., and crucially, determine their willingness to pay for these specific enhancements over basic solutions.
  5. Learn from competitor critiques regarding usability and moderation (e.g., Babbble needing content control, Fluo's confusing signup). Ensure your platform, especially with potentially novel interactive features, has an incredibly intuitive user interface and robust moderation tools from day one. Complexity or poor moderation can negate engagement benefits.
  6. Map out the entire competitive landscape, not just direct virtual event platforms. Consider adjacent tools for community building (like TheirCircle), meeting engagement (like MeetingPulse), and even niche communication tools. Understand how event organizers currently 'hack' solutions together and where the true friction lies.

Questions

  1. With 17+ competitors in this 'Swamp', what is the single, specific, and provable reason an event organizer would abandon their current tools (even well-liked ones like Pigeonhole Live for specific features) and pay for your platform, overcoming the high switching costs and market noise?
  2. How will your specific combination of virtual lounges, Q&A, and gamification fundamentally address the core user criticisms of virtual events being 'boring' and 'disorganized' in a way that demonstrably improves attendee satisfaction and provides clear ROI for the organizer, beyond what existing point solutions offer?
  3. Instead of broad appeal, which highly specific niche market (e.g., internal corporate training events, scientific research symposia, large-scale non-profit fundraisers) finds current virtual event platforms completely inadequate for their unique interactive needs, and how have you validated their willingness to pay a premium for your tailored solution?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 17
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 3
  • Net use signal: 28.7%
    • Positive use signal: 28.7%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Pigeonhole Live - Polls, Q&A, quizzes for every event

31 May 2023 Events Meetings Productivity

Boost meetings, events, and classrooms with real-time Q&As, interactive polls, chats, and reactions! Ignite participation and discussions across in-person, virtual, and hybrid spaces for a complete attendee experience.

Pigeonhole Live's Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with many users congratulating the team. Users praised its engagement features, ease of use compared to competitors, customization options, and open API. Several users are excited to try it for real-time Q&As, live chats, and interactive learning, anticipating increased engagement in online events. Some long-time users expressed their continued appreciation. A feature request for a social mode with limited muting was also suggested.

Users criticize online Q&A sessions for being disorganized and ineffective, questioning their suitability for specific use cases like webinars and town halls. There's also a general sentiment that online events tend to be unengaging and boring.

Avatar
200
22
36.4%
22
200
36.4%
Relevance

Workverse Virtual Workspace - For productive work, team meetings, workshops, fun events.

29 Jun 2023 Privacy Productivity Video Streaming

Workverse: Beyond meetings. Embrace an immersive virtual workspace for focused collaboration, workshops, parties, and games - all in one secure place. Boost productivity and create lasting connections. Experience the future of remote work today.

The Product Hunt launch received positive feedback, with multiple users congratulating the team. One user specifically inquired about the product's user-friendliness for those new to Web3. Another user praised the product's exceptional quality and attention to detail, and a third user deemed the project great.

Avatar
88
5
5
88
Relevance

TheirCircle - Community building & immersive events in a hybrid platform

14 Apr 2024 Events Community Monetization

TheirCircle is your all-in-one platform for building thriving communities, hosting immersive events, & boosting hybrid collaboration.

TheirCircle is receiving positive feedback for its flexibility, simplicity, and ability to foster team engagement and intentional bonding. Users are excited about its potential for hosting customized events. Key features highlighted include its immersive, AI-powered experience, as well as its UI, community focus, and opportunities for monetization and rewards, suggesting a revolutionary approach to event planning.

Avatar
14
3
100.0%
3
14
100.0%
Relevance

A VR-chat App for online gatherings

26 Jun 2024 Artificial Intelligence

Hey HN,I've been working on a VR-chat app, something like a 3D version of Zoom, and I'd love to get your feedback.I built the app using React and BabylonJS. It uses DailyCo for WebRTC, enabling real-time video and audio communication.Features: Users can create virtual rooms to hang out with their friends. Custom spatial audio allows you to converse with people in the room, even with other conversations happening nearby. Minimalist design for quick loading and compatibility with slower systems.Why I built it: The goal is to bring distributed remote communities closer together by simulating real-life social gatherings, especially for those who can't meet up in person.Current state: It's a basic prototype right now, and I'm looking to gauge interest and gather feedback from the community.Try it out: You can hop into a sample room here: https://digital-den.onrender.com/room?roomId=universal-hango... to get a feel for the app and the spatial audio in action. I'll be in the room to chat and answer any questions you might have.Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and suggestions!Thanks, Omar S.

Avatar
2
2
Relevance

Fluo is an AI powered immersive chat room web app

03 Apr 2024 Artificial Intelligence

Past-time IRC enthusiasts here! Fluo.chat aims to recapture the essence of those vibrant online meeting places of the past and adapt it for the modern digital landscape. The concept of genuine, real-time interaction with strangers has become a rarity. Our journey began with a simple question: What if we could recreate the atmosphere of IRC channels but with a modern twist? We envisioned a platform that not only facilitates real-time conversations but also enhances them with immersive, atmospheric elements. We've designed each space to simulate the feeling of going out and mingling with people who share similar interests.Features: Music (live-streaming)AI hosts with personalitiesVenue cap limitDMs (we call them whisper)Live venue status & weather updatesVisuals change according to number of usersMobile (soon)Custom venues (ver 2.0)P.S email fluochat@protonmail.com and tell us what venue you would like to hang out with your friends and we will create it! Would you like your live place to be featured? Also contact us!

Users found the signup process unclear regarding the app's purpose. There were requests to release the code for self-hosting and to update Microsoft Comic Chat to 64-bit. Some users expressed nostalgia for a chat app incorporating LLM, voice, and comedy technology.

Users criticized the product for having an uninformative signup flow, lacking an option to self-host, and not updating Microsoft Comic Chat to 64-bit.

Avatar
7
4
25.0%
4
7
25.0%
Relevance

Babbble - Add live chat to your presentation

22 Aug 2024 SaaS Chat rooms Messaging

Add live chat to live meetings or events—no setup required. Just click, create, and share your unique chat link. Start a chat, share a link, or even use a QR code for instant access. Turn passive listeners into active participants!

Users appreciate the tool's simplicity and ease of joining live chats, highlighting its potential to enhance engagement during workshops, networking events, and presentations. The absence of logins is seen as a significant advantage. One user praised it as a smart idea. However, there's a need for better information on managing conversations smoothly within the platform.

The primary criticism focuses on the lack of content control tools within the chat functionality. Users are requesting features to limit or moderate chat content, suggesting a need for enhanced safety and moderation capabilities.

Avatar
11
7
42.9%
7
11
42.9%
Top