An AI-Powered WordPress Site Builder That We Are Open-Sourcing Today
Users appreciate the AI integration and continuous improvements in WordPress, but express concerns over plugin integration issues, licensing problems, and the complexity of the platform. Many find WordPress suitable for basic blogging and non-technical users, yet some prefer alternatives like Squarespace, Jekyll, or Drupal for simplicity, control, or large-scale projects. The freemium model of plugins is noted, with skepticism about long-term usefulness. There's interest in full site editing and better communication of changes. Ethical concerns are raised about fake reviews and Automattic's practices. Overall, WordPress is seen as essential for web publishing but bloated and in need of better solutions for ease of use and security.
Users criticize the product for integration challenges, design limitations, and a steep learning curve. There's a consensus on the bloat and complexity of WordPress, reliance on plugins, and high costs for full functionality. Technical debt, SEO issues, and plugin integration are also concerns. The UI is considered difficult, and there are licensing and security worries. Criticisms extend to poor communication, lack of innovation compared to competitors, and dissatisfaction with Automattic's practices. Users find the setup process long and the platform not user-friendly for beginners, with some questioning the coding quality and paradigms.