make an site builder via new WordPress editor, which is blocks editor

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Freemium

People love using similar products but resist paying. You’ll need to either find who will pay or create additional value that’s worth paying for.

Should You Build It?

Build but think about differentiation and monetization.


Your are here

Creating a site builder within the WordPress block editor ecosystem puts you in the "Freemium" category, where users appreciate the value but might resist paying. With 11 similar products already out there, it's a competitive space, but there's clearly demand. Engagement seems high with an average of 13 comments on similar products, indicating active interest and discussion. The discussions and criticisms from other similar product launches highlight the importance of ease of use and performance, as well as seamless integration with existing plugins and themes. Users appreciate AI integration and streamlined development. Keep in mind that many users are concerned about bloat and complexity, so it's critical you emphasize simplicity and efficiency.

Recommendations

  1. Clearly define your target user. Given the freemium nature of the category, start by identifying which users get the most value from the free version of your site builder. Understanding their needs will allow you to better position your premium offerings. For example, focus on users creating landing pages or small business sites.
  2. Develop compelling premium features that cater to the needs of your target users. Based on user feedback from competitors, consider features that enhance design capabilities, improve SEO, or offer advanced customization options that go beyond the basic block editor. Think about offering advanced blocks, integrations with other services, or custom design templates.
  3. Explore team-based pricing or agency-focused features. Given the existing competition, differentiate by targeting teams or agencies who build sites for multiple clients. Consider offering features like team collaboration, client management, or white-labeling options that would appeal to agencies.
  4. Offer personalized support or consulting services. Many WordPress users struggle with the technical aspects of building and maintaining a website. Providing personalized help, training, or consulting services can be a valuable add-on that justifies a premium price. Consider offering setup assistance, theme customization, or ongoing maintenance packages.
  5. Focus on performance and optimization. Several similar products are criticized for slow loading times and bloated code. Prioritize clean code and optimized assets to ensure your site builder performs well. Test your site builder thoroughly to identify and fix any performance bottlenecks.
  6. Make your free version attractive but limited. Following the feedback, the free version should offer tangible value but have limitations that encourage users to upgrade. For example, offer a limited number of templates or restrict access to advanced features in the free version.
  7. Actively solicit feedback from users and iterate on your product. Engage with your users through surveys, forums, and social media to gather feedback and identify areas for improvement. Use this feedback to prioritize new features, fix bugs, and improve the overall user experience. Given the criticisms from competitor products, make sure to communicate changes clearly and transparently.

Questions

  1. What specific user problems are you aiming to solve that existing WordPress site builders haven't addressed effectively, and how will your block-based approach offer a unique advantage?
  2. How will you balance the need for a feature-rich site builder with the need to avoid bloat and maintain fast loading times, addressing a common concern among WordPress users?
  3. Considering the existing competition and the freemium model, what is your long-term strategy for converting free users into paying customers, and how will you ensure sustainable revenue growth?

Your are here

Creating a site builder within the WordPress block editor ecosystem puts you in the "Freemium" category, where users appreciate the value but might resist paying. With 11 similar products already out there, it's a competitive space, but there's clearly demand. Engagement seems high with an average of 13 comments on similar products, indicating active interest and discussion. The discussions and criticisms from other similar product launches highlight the importance of ease of use and performance, as well as seamless integration with existing plugins and themes. Users appreciate AI integration and streamlined development. Keep in mind that many users are concerned about bloat and complexity, so it's critical you emphasize simplicity and efficiency.

Recommendations

  1. Clearly define your target user. Given the freemium nature of the category, start by identifying which users get the most value from the free version of your site builder. Understanding their needs will allow you to better position your premium offerings. For example, focus on users creating landing pages or small business sites.
  2. Develop compelling premium features that cater to the needs of your target users. Based on user feedback from competitors, consider features that enhance design capabilities, improve SEO, or offer advanced customization options that go beyond the basic block editor. Think about offering advanced blocks, integrations with other services, or custom design templates.
  3. Explore team-based pricing or agency-focused features. Given the existing competition, differentiate by targeting teams or agencies who build sites for multiple clients. Consider offering features like team collaboration, client management, or white-labeling options that would appeal to agencies.
  4. Offer personalized support or consulting services. Many WordPress users struggle with the technical aspects of building and maintaining a website. Providing personalized help, training, or consulting services can be a valuable add-on that justifies a premium price. Consider offering setup assistance, theme customization, or ongoing maintenance packages.
  5. Focus on performance and optimization. Several similar products are criticized for slow loading times and bloated code. Prioritize clean code and optimized assets to ensure your site builder performs well. Test your site builder thoroughly to identify and fix any performance bottlenecks.
  6. Make your free version attractive but limited. Following the feedback, the free version should offer tangible value but have limitations that encourage users to upgrade. For example, offer a limited number of templates or restrict access to advanced features in the free version.
  7. Actively solicit feedback from users and iterate on your product. Engage with your users through surveys, forums, and social media to gather feedback and identify areas for improvement. Use this feedback to prioritize new features, fix bugs, and improve the overall user experience. Given the criticisms from competitor products, make sure to communicate changes clearly and transparently.

Questions

  1. What specific user problems are you aiming to solve that existing WordPress site builders haven't addressed effectively, and how will your block-based approach offer a unique advantage?
  2. How will you balance the need for a feature-rich site builder with the need to avoid bloat and maintain fast loading times, addressing a common concern among WordPress users?
  3. Considering the existing competition and the freemium model, what is your long-term strategy for converting free users into paying customers, and how will you ensure sustainable revenue growth?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 11
  • Engagement: High
    • Average number of comments: 13
  • Net use signal: 7.7%
    • Positive use signal: 16.8%
    • Negative use signal: 9.1%
  • Net buy signal: -5.2%
    • Positive buy signal: 1.3%
    • Negative buy signal: 6.5%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

An AI-Powered WordPress Site Builder That We Are Open-Sourcing Today

Users appreciate the AI integration and continuous improvements in WordPress, but express concerns over plugin integration issues, licensing problems, and the complexity of the platform. Many find WordPress suitable for basic blogging and non-technical users, yet some prefer alternatives like Squarespace, Jekyll, or Drupal for simplicity, control, or large-scale projects. The freemium model of plugins is noted, with skepticism about long-term usefulness. There's interest in full site editing and better communication of changes. Ethical concerns are raised about fake reviews and Automattic's practices. Overall, WordPress is seen as essential for web publishing but bloated and in need of better solutions for ease of use and security.

Users criticize the product for integration challenges, design limitations, and a steep learning curve. There's a consensus on the bloat and complexity of WordPress, reliance on plugins, and high costs for full functionality. Technical debt, SEO issues, and plugin integration are also concerns. The UI is considered difficult, and there are licensing and security worries. Criticisms extend to poor communication, lack of innovation compared to competitors, and dissatisfaction with Automattic's practices. Users find the setup process long and the platform not user-friendly for beginners, with some questioning the coding quality and paradigms.


Avatar
192
82
-4.9%
-9.8%
82
192
12.2%
2.4%
Relevance

aBlocks – WordPress Gutenberg Blocks - Build stunning WordPress websites with Gutenberg by aBlocks

aBlocks is a Gutenberg WordPress builder plugin for creating responsive websites like eCommerce, landing pages, and more. With a user-friendly interface and advanced features, it’s perfect for beginners and experts to build professional websites effortlessly.

Users are overwhelmingly positive about aBlocks, a Gutenberg page builder, describing it as a game-changer for simplifying WordPress website creation. Many appreciate its positive impact on the Gutenberg experience, with some switching from Elementor/Divi for its simplicity and performance. There is excitement surrounding its future development and potential growth within Academy LMS.

A user expressed a desire for aBlocks to have been available sooner, indicating a perceived value and utility that would have been beneficial if accessible earlier.


Avatar
31
8
25.0%
8
31
25.0%
Relevance

GutenKit - Ultimate No-Code Page Builder Blocks For Gutenberg

GutenKit is your ultimate Gutenberg block editor solution for WordPress. Build any website – business, portfolio, blog, SaaS, and more – with 500+ templates, 50+ blocks, and dynamic features. Enjoy full creative freedom and zero coding. Start building today!

GutenKit's Product Hunt launch garnered overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising its ease of use, intuitive design, and variety of blocks. Several users congratulated Ataurr and wished the product success. Commenters found it promising and amazing, expressing intent to try it and use it for building pages. Many highlighted the handy free features and that GutenKit is a great tool. Questions were raised regarding PageSpeed/core vitals, upgrade plans, and the availability of a free version. One user installed the plugin and expressed being impressed with the features.

Users expressed hesitancy due to concerns about PageSpeed and core web vitals scores.


Avatar
82
13
61.5%
13
82
61.5%
Relevance

Turn Tailwind into editable WordPress Block styles – build sites faster

While building a WordPress website recently...I realized how tedious and slow it is to fiddle with the WP Block editor UI.I knew that you could build sites/layouts much faster and easier in Tailwind.So I wrote a script to convert the Tailwind HTML code into WP Block code.This means that the utility classes/styles you write can be easily edited by others with the Gutenberg/FSE's native drag-and-drop editing UI.Here's a video to explain more (on ProductHunt): https://www.producthunt.com/posts/tailwind-to-wordpress-bloc...Let me know what you think: I'll read any and all of your feedback...

Users appreciate the tool for converting Tailwind to WordPress blocks, highlighting its time-saving benefits. They also value the integration from Figma to Tailwind to WordPress. Some users note that while Gutenberg is fast, raw code remains faster. A suggestion was made to add a preview feature similar to Tailwind Play. One user mentioned using the TailPress plugin and found it cool.

The product needs conversion to GenerateBlocks and lacks a preview feature.


Avatar
22
5
40.0%
5
22
40.0%
Relevance

Tailwind to WordPress Blocks - Turn Tailwind into editable WP Block styles - develop faster

Build sites/layouts easily, quickly, and efficiently in Tailwind. Then convert it to WP Blocks with Gutenberg/FSE-editable styles 🎨 Accelerate dev speed, productivity, and quality. Build WordPress sites without the frustration. Less code, easy maintenance.

The Product Hunt launch received positive feedback, with users congratulating the team. Users find the tool useful for WordPress development, particularly with Gutenberg blocks. Tailwind CSS integration is noted as a way to speed up WordPress site development. Some users are trying it out and find it interesting.


Avatar
86
5
40.0%
5
86
40.0%
Relevance

Nino Site – Block-based site builder module

08 Mar 2023 Website Builder

Nino Site is a simple site builder for quickly launching a website. No complicated panels. Prebuilt header and footer components. We're using it for our landing and static pages (https://about.nino.app/en) but you can use it for anything! Your site will be served directly from a CDN with excellent SEO.It is a module on Nino, a modular workspace app. Feedback are appreciated :)Previously:- Nino Doc https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34451023- Nino Todo https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34608404- Nino Blog https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34749522- Nino Drive https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34853990


Avatar
1
1
Relevance

Droip - Simplified & scalable no-code website builder for WordPress

Droip is a full-fledged no-code website builder for WordPress. Experience granular control over website elements and design any complex layouts. Get a visual no-code editor, an all-encompassing media manager, accessibility tools, interactions, and more.

Droip's Product Hunt launch garnered overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users congratulating Kawshar and the team. Many lauded it as a promising no-code WordPress website builder, praising its potential to change the landscape and streamline development. The intuitive UX and user-friendly interface, likened to Webflow for WordPress, were highlighted. Users expressed excitement about features like Figma to Droip conversion. A suggestion was made to clarify the Free version and a request for WooCommerce features was also mentioned.

Users criticize the unclear features of the free version, hindering conversion. They also find download instructions unclear, as it's not in the WordPress repository. Additionally, it needs more WooCommerce features to compete effectively with Elementor.


Avatar
209
24
12.5%
24
209
12.5%
Top