The AI Notebook App launch on Product Hunt received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with many users congratulating the team and expressing excitement about its potential for productivity and organization. Users praised its real-time transcription, instant summaries, smart search, and simple design. Questions arose regarding compatibility with other apps like iOS Notes, integration with platforms like YouTube and Readwise, functionality as a second brain, and unique advantages over competitors like Notion AI. Inquiries were also made about features like handwritten note recognition, audio transcription capabilities, organization options, sharing notes, and mobile/team support.

Users criticize the product for its limited usefulness without a web version and the inability to search saved YouTube content. Concerns exist about the app feeling cluttered with too many notes, prompting privacy and security inquiries regarding the AI Notebook. The paywall screen's design and button transition are also flagged for needing improvement. Users ask for more clarification on how the AI Notebook operates.

FileAI is well-received, particularly for electricians. Users have requested customization options and regulatory compliance features.

Users have requested customization options for AI responses. They also suggested implementing regulations to govern the AI's behavior and output.

The Product Hunt launch received a mix of positive feedback and critical questions. Many users congratulated the team and expressed excitement about the AI Assistant's potential for productivity, research, and content creation. Some users inquired about data privacy, security, and personalization effectiveness. Comparisons to ChatGPT and custom GPTs were common, with questions about differentiation and LLM choice. Suggestions included multi-language support, integrations, pre-made prompts and a user marketplace. Some users raised concerns about the generic feel and auto-transition to paid plans, while others loved the capabilities and sleek interface.

Users criticize the product's lack of originality, suspecting AI-generated content and questioning authenticity. Concerns arise about its differentiation from ChatGPT and custom GPTs, with doubts about its competitive advantage against LLM personalization. Some expressed the need for a strong competitive advantage to be sucessful long-term. Users also highlight concerns about the auto-transition to a paid plan and the need for the project to be open source. Others pointed out missing prelaunch and launch campaigns.

Reading aloud improves memory, study says.

Congratulating David on the launch.

Cool idea, useful service, but seems expensive.

Expensive for the amount of storage.

Excitement for GENIUS.io launch, AI's impact on reading/writing.

AI tool saved time summarizing 90s Bollywood movie.

No real-life applications for me.

Users commented on a speed reading tool for longform articles, noting its teleprompter-like feature and engaging presentation of reading material. Some questioned its necessity and superiority over traditional reading, while others criticized the focus on measurable reading speed and the user interface that discourages adding articles to a reading list. The concept of fighting reading addiction with another form of addiction was also mentioned, along with references to tsundoku and the anti-library phenomenon.

Users criticized the product for being unclear about its benefits for reading, lacking explanations, and questioning the need for measurable reading, especially for long-form content. Concerns were raised about the approach to addiction, the claustrophobic experience, lack of control and context, and a user interface that makes users feel like failures.

Users are generally excited about the app, particularly for managing information overload. Some users appreciate its simplicity and elegance, comparing it to Hacker News. However, there are concerns about potential bias in app reviews. One user mentioned they will look into the app and provide a review.

The primary criticism is that the app review process is biased.