Easyy.click is praised for its practicality, encryption, one-click access, and productivity-boosting capabilities. Users appreciate its simple, secure approach to managing bookmarks and notes, with some noting it as a superior alternative to traditional bookmark managers. The one-time fee for unlimited links and notes is considered a significant advantage. Several users inquired about features like shared bookmarks, encryption key recovery, update speed, and collaboration. Integration with platforms like Slack/Teams was also requested. The open-source nature of the tool is valued.

Users criticize the lack of team collaboration features and request future updates to address this. There are also requests for integrations with platforms like Slack and Teams to facilitate easier note sharing. One user claims that the current bookmarking system is not a simple way to manage links.

Users find the messaging fragmented and the purpose unclear. There is a request for live examples and the ability to create pages without signing up. One user is not interested but shares first impressions and offers congratulations.

Users criticized the product for having fragmented messaging and an unclear purpose. They also mentioned that the website lacks clarity and requires sign-up, which is inconvenient. Additionally, the absence of interactive demos was highlighted as a significant drawback.

Doesn't work with browser clearing data on exit

Incompatible with privacy settings

Users prefer browser-integrated bookmark managers over website-based ones. They appreciate the improved storing UI but note that accessing data could be better. There is interest in self-hosting options and a suggestion to turn the service into a Chrome extension. Additionally, users mention the lack of a screenshot on the homepage.

The product lacks browser integration and the ability to define keyboard shortcuts. Users question how it differentiates from existing products and note the absence of a screenshot on the homepage.

Users are questioning the value of the tool compared to manual saving and existing browser features, with concerns about copyright issues and the legality of saving content. There's interest in features like saving as PDFs and markdown, and reducing permissions required. Suggestions include using public repos to demonstrate the tool, fine-grained access tokens, and creating a GitHub user for contributions. Users are also interested in open-source availability, self-hosting, and extensions for browsers and iPhones. Feedback on app flow, security, and permissions, especially in IoT, is mixed, with some confusion and requests for fewer permissions.

Users expressed concerns about the product's added value, likening it to manual saving and existing browser features. They highlighted potential legal issues, such as copyright infringement and link-rot, making saved links less useful. Criticisms also focused on the app's permissions being too broad and risky, unclear functionality, and lack of self-hosting options. There were also mentions of security concerns, particularly with IoT, and the absence of a browser extension or iPhone app. Some users questioned the necessity of the app and its approach to user contributions and testing details.

Users discussed various bookmarking tools and services, with a focus on features like public bookmarks, tag autocompletion, self-hosting, and archival support. Concerns about development stagnation, support responsiveness, and GDPR compliance were raised. Some users expressed a preference for low-tech or text-based solutions, while others were interested in AI organization or full-text search capabilities. There were also inquiries about import capabilities, hardware requirements, and pricing willingness. The community offered alternative recommendations, including self-hosted options and open-source projects.

Users have reported technical issues such as homepage loading errors, sign-up problems, and service discontinuation. There's a demand for features like product demos, public bookmarks, and tag suggestions. Criticisms also focus on the choice of MongoDB over SQLite, lack of GDPR compliance, and difficulties in account deletion. The product's description is unclear, and there's a desire for a social component and better search functionality. Some users are skeptical about syncing to third parties and prefer outsourcing server maintenance.

Users compared the product to StumbleUpon, del.icio.us, are.na, and HunterGather, with some noting features from the new Chromium Opera. There's interest in Firefox support, a public API, and non-Chrome bookmark options. Users are generally excited, with one praising its role in holding the internet fabric together. Concerns include longevity, auto backup, and the use of 'blazing fast' in marketing. One user questions its suitability for Show HN, and another comment had no content.

Users criticized the product for unreliable social bookmarks and lack of support for non-Chrome browsers, particularly Firefox. The closure of a feature and the negative impact of platforms like Facebook were also mentioned. Marketing was seen as overreliant on the phrase 'blazing fast,' and some users felt the product was not appropriate for Show HN.

Developing selfhosted FOSS read later service, seeking feedback.

Name suggestions welcome.