Users raised concerns about the product's open source claims, patent issues with mp4, and lack of visible pricing information. Comparisons with similar services like Revideo and Remotion were made, questioning differences in API, rendering, and licensing. Technical issues with ffmpeg wasm, codec support, and file loading were noted. The 'Get in touch' button leading to a 404 page and forced sign-up were criticized. Some users appreciated the service but were deterred by the sales approach and misleading information on the website. There were also requests for transparent pricing and questions about the use of Pixi.js.

Users criticized the product for not being truly open source, misleading claims, and lack of public repositories. Concerns over memory safety, codec errors, and patent issues were noted. The requirement for a license key, forced sign-up, and issues with file compatibility were disliked. Criticisms also focused on the lack of transparent pricing, with many mentioning hidden costs behind email requirements and no fixed pricing. The product's value proposition for non-technical users and small target market were questioned, along with the effectiveness of Show HN/Product Hunt for growth.

Users criticized the product for a black screen issue, slow exporting, lack of an undo system, poor mobile compatibility, and unresponsive features. They suggested improvements like a confirmation dialog for unsaved projects, a landing page with a video tutorial, and better support for file formats like AVI. Concerns were also raised about the large download size, security, low contrast in the UI, and the requirement for a credit card. The browser-based approach and lack of support for Firefox were questioned, and the need for gradual optimization post-launch was highlighted.

Users are interested in running ffmpeg in the browser, inquiring if the product is open source, and suggesting it as a perfect match with Peertube.

The main criticisms are that ffmpeg is not running in the browser and it is unclear if the product is open source.

The video editing tool launch received positive feedback, with users praising its accessibility, convenience, impressive features, and ease of use. Many congratulated the creator and expressed intentions to try the tool, appreciating the hard work behind it. One user found the marketing claim "Turn clips into masterpieces" to be exaggerated. Overall, the sentiment is encouraging and positive.

The primary criticism revolves around the tagline "Turn clips into masterpieces," which was perceived as exaggerated or ridiculous.

VideoFast is lauded for its ease of use, especially for beginners and busy creators, with many praising its simple interface and time-saving premade animations. Users appreciate the tool's functionality for quick edits, social media content creation, and the ability to add text, audio, and customize animations. Several users congratulated Rexan on the launch, expressing excitement about VideoFast's potential and offering support. Suggestions for improvement include website performance enhancements, more templates, and future support for features like 4K video export and more customization options.

Users criticized the product launch for lacking sufficient examples and templates. Website performance issues, specifically object-fit and navigation problems, were noted, alongside concerns about slow upload times for large video files. Several users reported choppy landing page experiences, stretched images, and incomplete account pages. There were questions regarding its capabilities compared to competitors and requests for advanced features. Some users expressed doubt about VideoFast's power for complex projects.

Ankur's free video editing tool launch on Product Hunt received overwhelmingly positive feedback. Users praised its ease of use, effectiveness, and rich feature set, particularly highlighting its value for beginners. Many congratulated the team on the launch and the tool's usefulness in simplifying video creation. Several users are planning to test the tool with their editing teams, and free access was a repeatedly emphasized benefit.

Complains about high pricing for individuals and teams.

Pricing is too high.

The Product Hunt launch received positive feedback, with users congratulating the team and expressing excitement about the tool's potential for video creation and digital storytelling. Multiple users requested demo videos to better understand the tool's capabilities before using it. Some users cited specific use-cases, involving GNOME, Blender, and YouTube. Users highlighted the tool's user-friendliness and efficiency, and some requested more features.

Users are requesting more features and video examples to better understand the product's capabilities. Several users specifically asked for a demo to evaluate its suitability. There's also interest in incorporating AI-powered features, particularly for automated video cropping and storyline suggestions to enhance the tool's functionality.

Users find the product simple and efficient for creating quick feature videos, with some comparing it to alternatives like RunwayML and Pika APIs. There's interest in additional features such as templates and bulk animation editing. One user inquired about the philosophy behind the 'Website to Video' concept. The tool's ability to create shareable videos from website elements without requiring sign-up for testing is appreciated.

Users have criticized the product for having bland videos, the absence of APIs for RunwayML and Pika, and the tedious process required to edit animations for each word or phrase.