Ai-enabled broken bike reporting mobile app for Amsterdam with ...

...automated form completion

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Minimal Signal

There’s barely any market activity - either because the problem is very niche or not important enough. You’ll need to prove real demand exists before investing significant time.

Should You Build It?

Not yet, validate more.


Your are here

Your idea for an AI-enabled bike reporting app in Amsterdam falls into a category where there's minimal market activity. This means the problem you're addressing might be very niche or not seen as a high priority by enough people. Given that we only found two similar products, confidence in this assessment is low. The engagement on similar products is also low, with an average of just two comments. This doesn't necessarily mean the idea is bad, but it strongly suggests that you need to validate the demand for your app more thoroughly before investing significant time and resources into development. You'll need to demonstrate there's genuine interest in a solution like yours within the Amsterdam cycling community and local government.

Recommendations

  1. Start by identifying online communities and forums where Amsterdam cyclists gather. Share your idea and ask for feedback on their current experiences reporting broken bikes and what features they'd find most useful in a reporting app. Frame it as a problem you're trying to solve to get honest opinions.
  2. Offer to manually assist a few cyclists with reporting broken bikes. This could involve helping them fill out the current forms or navigating the existing reporting channels. This hands-on approach will give you valuable insights into the pain points and frustrations users currently face and let you experience their problem first hand.
  3. Create a simple explainer video showcasing how your AI-enabled app would streamline the broken bike reporting process. Highlight key features like automated form completion and integration with city services. Share the video on relevant online platforms and measure how many people watch it in its entirety to gauge interest.
  4. Gauge the sentiment around your app on the explainer video you created, and consider adding a 'waiting list' if there is expressed interest in your idea. Don't start the actual building process until you have confirmed interest from enough users.
  5. Based on the criticism from the similar product 'SmoothRide InfrastructureGPT', focus on features that foster consistent user engagement and suggestion tracking to enhance transparency. This also means, that you need to make it easy for the users to see what their impact is, and that their reports result in actual fixes. SmoothRide also had issues with not being integrated into existing city platforms.
  6. Explore partnerships with local bike shops or cycling advocacy groups. They may be willing to promote your app to their customers or members, providing you with a built-in user base and valuable feedback.
  7. Contact the Amsterdam municipality to understand their current bike repair reporting procedures and identify potential collaboration opportunities. Demonstrating your app can improve their efficiency and data collection could lead to official endorsement or integration.

Questions

  1. What specific data sources will your AI model use to automate form completion, and how will you ensure the accuracy and reliability of this data, considering the potential for errors or inconsistencies?
  2. How will you differentiate your app from existing bike reporting channels in Amsterdam, such as the municipality's website or phone hotline, to incentivize users to switch to your platform?
  3. What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) you will track to measure the success of your app, and how will you use this data to continuously improve the user experience and address any emerging issues or concerns?

Your are here

Your idea for an AI-enabled bike reporting app in Amsterdam falls into a category where there's minimal market activity. This means the problem you're addressing might be very niche or not seen as a high priority by enough people. Given that we only found two similar products, confidence in this assessment is low. The engagement on similar products is also low, with an average of just two comments. This doesn't necessarily mean the idea is bad, but it strongly suggests that you need to validate the demand for your app more thoroughly before investing significant time and resources into development. You'll need to demonstrate there's genuine interest in a solution like yours within the Amsterdam cycling community and local government.

Recommendations

  1. Start by identifying online communities and forums where Amsterdam cyclists gather. Share your idea and ask for feedback on their current experiences reporting broken bikes and what features they'd find most useful in a reporting app. Frame it as a problem you're trying to solve to get honest opinions.
  2. Offer to manually assist a few cyclists with reporting broken bikes. This could involve helping them fill out the current forms or navigating the existing reporting channels. This hands-on approach will give you valuable insights into the pain points and frustrations users currently face and let you experience their problem first hand.
  3. Create a simple explainer video showcasing how your AI-enabled app would streamline the broken bike reporting process. Highlight key features like automated form completion and integration with city services. Share the video on relevant online platforms and measure how many people watch it in its entirety to gauge interest.
  4. Gauge the sentiment around your app on the explainer video you created, and consider adding a 'waiting list' if there is expressed interest in your idea. Don't start the actual building process until you have confirmed interest from enough users.
  5. Based on the criticism from the similar product 'SmoothRide InfrastructureGPT', focus on features that foster consistent user engagement and suggestion tracking to enhance transparency. This also means, that you need to make it easy for the users to see what their impact is, and that their reports result in actual fixes. SmoothRide also had issues with not being integrated into existing city platforms.
  6. Explore partnerships with local bike shops or cycling advocacy groups. They may be willing to promote your app to their customers or members, providing you with a built-in user base and valuable feedback.
  7. Contact the Amsterdam municipality to understand their current bike repair reporting procedures and identify potential collaboration opportunities. Demonstrating your app can improve their efficiency and data collection could lead to official endorsement or integration.

Questions

  1. What specific data sources will your AI model use to automate form completion, and how will you ensure the accuracy and reliability of this data, considering the potential for errors or inconsistencies?
  2. How will you differentiate your app from existing bike reporting channels in Amsterdam, such as the municipality's website or phone hotline, to incentivize users to switch to your platform?
  3. What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) you will track to measure the success of your app, and how will you use this data to continuously improve the user experience and address any emerging issues or concerns?

  • Confidence: Low
    • Number of similar products: 2
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 2
  • Net use signal: 53.3%
    • Positive use signal: 53.3%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

SmoothRide InfrastructureGPT - Citizens 🤝 AI towards more livable places

a novel web app empowering citizens to play a more direct role in improving local (cycling) infrastructure. - Upload an experience - Rate AI-generated suggestions (based on international best practices) - Get inspired - Share with municipality & others

SmoothRide is praised for its innovative approach to inclusive urban planning, optimizing cities in a user-centric way to enable citizen co-creation. Suggestions include features for engagement and tracking. One user mentioned wikigpt3.com and offered to help with directory listing upon receiving email app details.

The Product Hunt launch received criticism regarding the need for features that foster consistent user engagement and suggestion tracking to enhance transparency. Additionally, users expressed a desire for integration with city platforms and resources for urban planning education to broaden the application and understanding of the product.


Avatar
66
3
66.7%
3
66
66.7%
Top