Should I Build It Should I Build It
23 Mar 2025
Productivity Chrome Extensions

A chrome extension that helps you re-write any content you see online ...

...into simple English

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Minimal Signal

There’s barely any market activity - either because the problem is very niche or not important enough. You’ll need to prove real demand exists before investing significant time.

Should You Build It?

Not yet, validate more.

Your are here

Your idea for a Chrome extension to simplify online content into simple English falls into the 'Minimal Signal' category. This means that based on publicly available data from similar product launches, there's currently very little market activity or expressed demand specifically for this type of tool. We found only two similar launches, giving us low confidence in this assessment but also suggesting potentially low direct competition among dedicated tools. These similar products saw very low engagement (average of 1 comment), and we didn't find explicit signals indicating whether users wanted to use or pay for them. This lack of signal could mean the problem is very niche, not painful enough for most, or that people are already using alternative solutions (like general AI tools or browser features). Therefore, the key recommendation is to hold off on significant development and first validate whether a genuine, unmet need exists for your specific approach to simplifying English content via a browser extension.

Recommendations

  1. Identify specific online communities where potential users struggle with complex English. Think beyond general users – target forums for non-native English speakers, academic researchers navigating dense papers, or professional groups dealing with jargon. Post questions not just asking if they want your tool, but how they currently cope with complex text and what frustrates them about existing methods (including copy-pasting into AI tools).
  2. Offer a 'concierge' simplification service. Find 2-3 people from your target audience and offer to manually simplify specific web pages or documents they find challenging. This hands-on approach will provide deep insights into the specific type of simplification needed (vocabulary, structure, tone?) and the context in which the need arises.
  3. Create a short demo video showcasing exactly how your extension would work on different types of complex content (e.g., a news article vs. a technical blog post). Focus on the unique 'simple English' transformation. Use this video on a landing page to collect email sign-ups for a potential beta list, measuring conversion rate as a key validation metric.
  4. Instead of immediately asking for a deposit, focus on getting sign-ups for an early access/beta list. Engage with these sign-ups through surveys or short interviews to gauge their willingness to pay after understanding the value proposition. Ask them directly: 'If this tool consistently saved you X minutes/day or improved your comprehension significantly, what would it be worth?'
  5. Set a concrete validation goal: Aim to get detailed feedback (through interviews or surveys confirming a strong need) from at least 5-10 highly relevant potential users within the next 3-4 weeks. If you struggle to find individuals who express a significant, unmet pain point related to simplifying online English, you should seriously reconsider the core premise or pivot towards a different problem.
  6. Research existing solutions thoroughly, including general AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) and browser 'Reader Modes'. Understand their limitations specifically for simplifying English effectively and reliably. Address the potential 'use at own risk' concern noted for a similar tool by focusing on quality, transparency, and perhaps specific niches (e.g., simplifying medical or legal text).

Questions

  1. Who is the most specific group of people desperately needing online text simplified (e.g., ESL learners preparing for exams, individuals with specific cognitive disabilities, researchers outside their core field), and why are generic AI tools or browser features failing them in ways your extension can uniquely address?
  2. Given that AI can rewrite text in many ways, what does 'simple English' precisely mean for your extension? Is it defined by specific readability scores (e.g., Flesch-Kincaid), vocabulary constraints, sentence length limits, or something else? How will you ensure consistent quality and avoid the pitfalls that led to 'use at own risk' warnings for similar tools?
  3. Considering the minimal signal and low engagement found, what's your hypothesis for why this specific problem hasn't generated more vocal demand, and what unconventional channel or strategy could you use to reach and activate the specific niche that truly needs this?

Your are here

Your idea for a Chrome extension to simplify online content into simple English falls into the 'Minimal Signal' category. This means that based on publicly available data from similar product launches, there's currently very little market activity or expressed demand specifically for this type of tool. We found only two similar launches, giving us low confidence in this assessment but also suggesting potentially low direct competition among dedicated tools. These similar products saw very low engagement (average of 1 comment), and we didn't find explicit signals indicating whether users wanted to use or pay for them. This lack of signal could mean the problem is very niche, not painful enough for most, or that people are already using alternative solutions (like general AI tools or browser features). Therefore, the key recommendation is to hold off on significant development and first validate whether a genuine, unmet need exists for your specific approach to simplifying English content via a browser extension.

Recommendations

  1. Identify specific online communities where potential users struggle with complex English. Think beyond general users – target forums for non-native English speakers, academic researchers navigating dense papers, or professional groups dealing with jargon. Post questions not just asking if they want your tool, but how they currently cope with complex text and what frustrates them about existing methods (including copy-pasting into AI tools).
  2. Offer a 'concierge' simplification service. Find 2-3 people from your target audience and offer to manually simplify specific web pages or documents they find challenging. This hands-on approach will provide deep insights into the specific type of simplification needed (vocabulary, structure, tone?) and the context in which the need arises.
  3. Create a short demo video showcasing exactly how your extension would work on different types of complex content (e.g., a news article vs. a technical blog post). Focus on the unique 'simple English' transformation. Use this video on a landing page to collect email sign-ups for a potential beta list, measuring conversion rate as a key validation metric.
  4. Instead of immediately asking for a deposit, focus on getting sign-ups for an early access/beta list. Engage with these sign-ups through surveys or short interviews to gauge their willingness to pay after understanding the value proposition. Ask them directly: 'If this tool consistently saved you X minutes/day or improved your comprehension significantly, what would it be worth?'
  5. Set a concrete validation goal: Aim to get detailed feedback (through interviews or surveys confirming a strong need) from at least 5-10 highly relevant potential users within the next 3-4 weeks. If you struggle to find individuals who express a significant, unmet pain point related to simplifying online English, you should seriously reconsider the core premise or pivot towards a different problem.
  6. Research existing solutions thoroughly, including general AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) and browser 'Reader Modes'. Understand their limitations specifically for simplifying English effectively and reliably. Address the potential 'use at own risk' concern noted for a similar tool by focusing on quality, transparency, and perhaps specific niches (e.g., simplifying medical or legal text).

Questions

  1. Who is the most specific group of people desperately needing online text simplified (e.g., ESL learners preparing for exams, individuals with specific cognitive disabilities, researchers outside their core field), and why are generic AI tools or browser features failing them in ways your extension can uniquely address?
  2. Given that AI can rewrite text in many ways, what does 'simple English' precisely mean for your extension? Is it defined by specific readability scores (e.g., Flesch-Kincaid), vocabulary constraints, sentence length limits, or something else? How will you ensure consistent quality and avoid the pitfalls that led to 'use at own risk' warnings for similar tools?
  3. Considering the minimal signal and low engagement found, what's your hypothesis for why this specific problem hasn't generated more vocal demand, and what unconventional channel or strategy could you use to reach and activate the specific niche that truly needs this?

  • Confidence: Low
    • Number of similar products: 2
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 1
  • Net use signal: 0.0%
    • Positive use signal: 0.0%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Rewrite AI – Rewrite the Content on Every Page (Chrome Extension)

26 Apr 2023 Artificial Intelligence

DISCLAIMER: This project was created using ChatGPT V4, an AI language model by OpenAI. The code was generated with minimal human intervention - not a single line of code was written by a human, but several prompts and copy-pasting were done by the project director, Franz Enzenhofer. While the AI contributed significantly to the development, users are advised to use the extension at their own risk.

Project created using ChatGPT V4 with minimal human intervention.

Use extension at own risk.

Avatar
3
1
1
3
Top