Your are here

The idea of building an operating system for farmers to manage exports in the commodities market, specifically soybeans and other commodities, lands in a challenging category. The 'Swamp' category suggests that there are existing solutions, but none have truly resonated or captured the market effectively. The presence of 4 similar products indicates some validation that this is a problem worth solving. However, the low engagement (2 comments on average) around these products signals that building traction will be tough. Without any buy or use signals, it's hard to say if this product is something farmers want. Given the competitive landscape and lack of strong positive signals, you should be very cautious moving forward. If similar solutions haven't caught on, you need a fundamentally different approach.

Recommendations

1. First, deeply investigate why current commodity management solutions haven't been successful. Understand the pain points farmers face with existing options. The similar products and their discussion summaries indicate that users look for direct connections to farmers, simplified trading, and sustainable practices. Analyze if these products delivered and what was missing.
2. Given the 'Swamp' category and low engagement, pinpoint a specific, underserved niche within the farming community. Instead of a broad solution, focus on a particular commodity, export destination, or farm size. This focused approach can help overcome the limitations observed in similar products' criticism, which is the need for country-specific requirements and integration with various platforms.
3. Consider developing tools that enhance existing platforms rather than creating a full-fledged operating system. Integrate with established systems to offer specialized functionality for export management, such as tariff calculations or logistics coordination. You can focus on providing value to existing providers, which mitigates the need for full market education.
4. Explore adjacent problems within the agricultural sector that might present more promising opportunities. Perhaps there's a need for improved supply chain visibility, risk management tools, or financial services tailored to farmers. Look at the Agroxy example where positive feedback included simplified commodity trading with improved margins; could there be a way to provide just that specific value?
5. Before investing significant resources, consider alternative opportunities that align better with market needs and offer a higher potential for success. Given the metrics and category, pivoting to a more promising market might be the most prudent approach. Save your resources to build a solution to a different problem that has positive buy/use signals.
6. Begin with an initial, concentrated effort to gauge farmer interest by using a simple landing page or survey that describes the value of the platform, and determine whether or not they would be interested in using it. Be sure to take the farmer's feedback and iterate the idea accordingly.

Questions

1. What are the specific pain points and unmet needs that farmers experience with current export management processes, and how does your solution offer a demonstrably superior alternative?
2. Considering the low engagement with similar products, what specific strategies will you implement to drive user adoption and create a vibrant community around your platform?
3. How will you address the need for customization and integration with diverse platforms, as highlighted in the criticisms of similar products, to ensure broad usability and market appeal?