rcf f r r r r r fc r t
Looks like your idea is a bit weird (trolling, spam, etc.). Maybe we are wrong and you're right...
If you think this was misjudged, please reach out to us at support@shouldibuild.it.
If you think this was misjudged, please reach out to us at support@shouldibuild.it.
Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal
Idea type: Freemium
People love using similar products but resist paying. You’ll need to either find who will pay or create additional value that’s worth paying for.
Should You Build It?
Build but think about differentiation and monetization.
Your are here
Your idea falls into the 'Freemium' category. This means people will likely enjoy using your product initially, but converting them to paying customers could be challenging. With 5 similar products already out there, you're entering a moderately competitive space. The average number of comments across these similar products is 14, suggesting fairly high engagement. Given this landscape, differentiation and a well-thought-out monetization strategy are crucial. The core challenge is finding out what specific value will compel users to upgrade from the free version.
Recommendations
- Start by deeply understanding which user segments derive the most benefit from the free version of your product. Analyze their usage patterns, gather feedback, and identify their pain points. For instance, with CFRS[] related products, users discussed confusing interfaces and mobile usability issues. Address these concerns early on to improve user satisfaction and retention.
- Based on your user insights, develop premium features that address the specific needs of your most engaged users. These features should provide significantly enhanced value compared to the free version. Examples: advanced customization options, more powerful tools, collaboration features, or removal of limitations present in the free version.
- Explore team-based pricing models rather than individual subscriptions. Companies or organizations may be willing to pay for features that benefit their teams, such as collaboration tools, shared resources, or centralized management. This is especially relevant if your product can enhance team productivity or workflows.
- Consider offering personalized help, consulting, or priority support as a premium add-on. Users who require additional assistance or customized solutions may be willing to pay for expert guidance. Given that some users found similar products confusing, providing clear instructions and support could be a valuable premium offering.
- Implement A/B testing with different pricing strategies on small user groups to determine the optimal price point. Experiment with different tiers, features, and payment models to understand what resonates best with your target audience. Closely monitor conversion rates and revenue to make data-driven decisions.
- Pay close attention to user feedback, especially criticisms, to continuously improve the product and address pain points. User feedback on similar products mentioned the need for more customization, intuitive interfaces, and better mobile optimization. Prioritize these improvements to enhance user experience and value.
Questions
- What are the most compelling premium features you can offer that will provide substantial added value to your free users and justify an upgrade?
- How can you effectively communicate the value proposition of your premium features to potential customers and convince them that it's worth paying for?
- What specific strategies will you employ to differentiate your product from the existing competitors in the freemium market and gain a competitive advantage?
Your are here
Your idea falls into the 'Freemium' category. This means people will likely enjoy using your product initially, but converting them to paying customers could be challenging. With 5 similar products already out there, you're entering a moderately competitive space. The average number of comments across these similar products is 14, suggesting fairly high engagement. Given this landscape, differentiation and a well-thought-out monetization strategy are crucial. The core challenge is finding out what specific value will compel users to upgrade from the free version.
Recommendations
- Start by deeply understanding which user segments derive the most benefit from the free version of your product. Analyze their usage patterns, gather feedback, and identify their pain points. For instance, with CFRS[] related products, users discussed confusing interfaces and mobile usability issues. Address these concerns early on to improve user satisfaction and retention.
- Based on your user insights, develop premium features that address the specific needs of your most engaged users. These features should provide significantly enhanced value compared to the free version. Examples: advanced customization options, more powerful tools, collaboration features, or removal of limitations present in the free version.
- Explore team-based pricing models rather than individual subscriptions. Companies or organizations may be willing to pay for features that benefit their teams, such as collaboration tools, shared resources, or centralized management. This is especially relevant if your product can enhance team productivity or workflows.
- Consider offering personalized help, consulting, or priority support as a premium add-on. Users who require additional assistance or customized solutions may be willing to pay for expert guidance. Given that some users found similar products confusing, providing clear instructions and support could be a valuable premium offering.
- Implement A/B testing with different pricing strategies on small user groups to determine the optimal price point. Experiment with different tiers, features, and payment models to understand what resonates best with your target audience. Closely monitor conversion rates and revenue to make data-driven decisions.
- Pay close attention to user feedback, especially criticisms, to continuously improve the product and address pain points. User feedback on similar products mentioned the need for more customization, intuitive interfaces, and better mobile optimization. Prioritize these improvements to enhance user experience and value.
Questions
- What are the most compelling premium features you can offer that will provide substantial added value to your free users and justify an upgrade?
- How can you effectively communicate the value proposition of your premium features to potential customers and convince them that it's worth paying for?
- What specific strategies will you employ to differentiate your product from the existing competitors in the freemium market and gain a competitive advantage?
- Confidence: Medium
- Number of similar products: 5
- Engagement: High
- Average number of comments: 14
- Net use signal: 1.7%
- Positive use signal: 3.3%
- Negative use signal: 1.7%
- Net buy signal: 0.0%
- Positive buy signal: 0.0%
- Negative buy signal: 0.0%
Help
This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.
The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.
The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.
The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.
Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.
The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.
The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.
The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.
Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.
Similar products
Relevance
CFRS[] – Minimalist turtle graphics with 6 commands: C, F, R, S, [, ]
This is a superset of CFR[] that was discussed last week at <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37956065>.Thanks to the creativity and wonderful demos shared by many people, I have created an extension of CFR[] to add an “S” command that can be used to make the turtle sleep for 20 ms and produce animation effects.Some demos:https://susam.net/cfrs.html#1https://susam.net/cfrs.html#2https://susam.net/cfrs.html#3https://susam.net/cfrs.html#4https://susam.net/cfrs.html#5
The product has been updated with an 'S' command for animation effects. However, users report that while the demo works on Firefox Android, the examples do not display graphics.
The examples provided lack graphical representations.
5
2
2
5
Relevance
CFRS[]: Minimal drawing language with 6 commands: C, F, R, S, [, ]
Asks about differences and graphics in new project.
Questions difference from past projects.
2
1
1
2
Relevance
CFR[]: Very minimal drawing language with 5 commands: C, F, R, [, ]
Demos:https://susam.net/cfr.html#0https://susam.net/cfr.html#3https://susam.net/cfr.html#5
Users engaged with a Show HN product involving Moroccan Zellige tiling and a CFR tool, creating designs with limited tools and enjoying the process. They shared tips, optimizations, and expressed interest in features like pinwheel sharing and space-filling curves. Some users faced issues with browser history and mobile usability, while others requested features like 'forward without color' and better command explanations. There was a mix of praise for minimalism and requests for more guidance, with suggestions for improvements in syntax definitions and instant feedback. The community also discussed the potential for combining with other languages and tools.
Users criticized the product for limited customization options, confusing interface, and lack of mobile optimization. They suggested improvements like counter-clockwise rotation, combining features, and adding a custom color palette. Criticisms also focused on the need for more elegant solutions, avoiding micro-optimizations, and providing command explanations. Users found the language repetitive, the notation complex, and the lack of spaces between letters problematic. They also reported technical issues like browser history trapping and a black screen. Requests were made for a hint box, better visibility on smartphones, and clearer definitions.
176
64
3.1%
64
176
6.2%
Relevance
Turtle graphics with only 6 commands: C, F, R, S, [, ]
The product is praised for its brilliance but criticized for being user-hostile on Android Chrome. It effectively clarifies repeatable block execution and the distinction between 'once' and 'once more' in block descriptions. There is also a query about whether it reposts on a schedule.
Users criticized the product for having a heavily cropped canvas, small text, and unclear button labels. They also pointed out an incorrect block execution description and suggested that the verb 'repeat' should be used instead of 'execute'. Additionally, the functionality of the product was found to be unclear.
2
4
4
2