Users congratulate the launch and praise the tool's usefulness for developers and designers, particularly for simplifying app icon creation. The clean and consistent design, excellent UI, impressive variety of styles, and easy customization options are well-received. One user specifically loves the shadows on the icons, while another calls the tool a game-changer for design work. The product's detailed work and single-task focus also received positive feedback.

Users are generally positive about the AI Icon Designer's launch and functionality, noting its ability to quickly generate app icons. One user pointed out the logo's origin, while another praised the landing page and wished success. A user requested a free trial or credits. Several users congratulated the launch and affirmed the product works as expected.

Users criticize the lack of a free trial or initial credits, hindering new user adoption. Furthermore, the product exhibits inconsistency by generating new icons while simultaneously using the old logo directly, creating a disjointed user experience.

The Product Hunt launch is receiving positive feedback, with users praising the effort and pre-generated icons. One user specifically highlights Ann from CandyIcons for her AI app. Several users expressed excitement and interest in trying the product, with one inquiring about the availability of a free first item. Overall sentiment is very positive, with one user simply stating "So beautiful!" and another congratulating the launch.

A user expressed concern about the lack of exclusivity when purchasing an icon, indicating a desire for unique usage rights rather than potential reuse by others.

yess sirrr

Excited about the launch; congratulates Efekan.

CandyIcons receives positive feedback for its delightful icon set and usefulness, particularly for developers needing to quickly try ideas. Users request more fonts, color customization, SVG export functionality, and a larger collection size. Suggestions include uni-color icon backgrounds and integration into the text stream. Some express limitations with emojis, suggesting a roadmap, and request a free trial to test the product. The app's check-in tracking for accountability is noted.

Users criticize the lack of customization options, specifically requesting more color and font choices. Several users highlighted the need for better color options and a desire for more vibrant choices. The inability to use emojis and integrate icons seamlessly into text was also mentioned. Some found it hard to communicate effectively with the tool and requested a free trial to assess its value before committing to a purchase.

Users express excitement and appreciation for the project, with many having followed its development on Twitch. They praise the design, open-sourcing of the marble effect, and its usefulness. The availability of the project for more frameworks is considered a great addition. Some users are eager to replace old avatar icons and several congratulate the team on the launch, noting the product looks fabulous and cute. There is also a question about AI integration.

The launch is receiving positive feedback. Users are excited about the handcrafted illustrations and congratulate the team on the launch. The product is described as nice and unusual.

Users appreciate the app's functionality, with particular interest in the icon retention feature and the ability to update icons from scripts. They suggest improvements like displaying the price before checkout, adding an FAQ section, and addressing concerns about icon customization loss after app updates. Some users question the necessity of machine learning and request credit for icon authors within the app. The app's name and pricing receive mixed feedback, with some finding it affordable and others proposing a different name. The app is considered useful for Dock users and those who want to customize their macOS icons.

Users have criticized the product for not showing prices before checkout, issues with updates removing old packages and custom icons, and poor user customization. There's a preference for the name 'Replaci\u00f3n' and complaints about icons resetting after updates. Users want a feature to hide the Dock for vertical pixels, find icon changes unclear, question the necessity of machine learning, and note a lack of clear credit for icon authors. The product is also seen as less feature-rich compared to 'Replacicon'.

Users express concerns about the AI's lack of deeper meaning in images and its impact on human creativity. The product's website has been criticized for poor mobile optimization, unnatural language, and spelling errors. There's interest in DIY image generation and suggestions for a free tier. Comparisons to similar free options and other AI tools suggest a need for distinct features. Users are curious about technical aspects like model size and loading times. The product is seen as potentially useful for events but lacks image resolution and selection options. The concept of using FOSS tools behind paywalls is debated.

Users criticized the Show HN product for its lack of depth and originality in AI-generated content, unappealing subscription model, poor mobile experience, and absence of a free trial or tier. The product's website was noted for having technical issues, such as broken links and poor design, and the content was deemed uninteresting with unnatural text that needs rephrasing. Additionally, users found the output quality low and the vectorization process unclear, with some preferring manual methods over AI. There were also concerns about the ethics of monetizing open-source tools without improving usability.

Playground's Product Hunt launch received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising its ease of use, intuitive design, versatile templates, and powerful AI capabilities for generating photorealistic and artistic designs. Many users expressed excitement about the no-waitlist access to Playground v3. Several comments highlighted its usefulness for meme creation, wallpapers, and various design needs. Comparisons to Canva were favorable, with some users already using Playground as their favorite graphics platform. Questions arose regarding user-generated content guidelines, collaboration features, export options, and comparisons to other AI tools.

Users question the product name and its collaborative design capabilities. Concerns arise regarding the lack of export options beyond Canva PDFs, which pose issues for professional printing. The logo generation feature is criticized for its lack of uniqueness and a paywall after limited free use. Users suggest improving team collaboration features to enhance overall user experience.

Comment Deleted

Drawing web canvas sandbox, evolving daily.

Users are pleased with the Appstore editor recommendation and are sharing their project to seek feedback and improvement ideas.

Congratulation Pixelease and team