AI research assistant for doctors, medical students and health ...

...enthusiasts

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.


Your are here

Your idea for an AI research assistant targeting doctors, medical students, and health enthusiasts falls into a crowded space, categorized as a 'Swamp.' This means several similar solutions exist, but none have truly captured the market's love, and competition is relatively high with 7 similar products. The engagement with these existing products is low, with an average of only 2 comments per launch, suggesting that these products might not be solving a dire need. Given this context, it's crucial to understand why these previous attempts haven't fully succeeded. The absence of strong positive signals (use or buy) further reinforces the challenges you might face. Entering a 'Swamp' requires a truly differentiated approach or a pivot to a more promising direction.

Recommendations

  1. Deeply research the failures of existing AI medical research tools. Understand the specific reasons why doctors, students, and enthusiasts haven't fully adopted them. Focus on identifying unmet needs or pain points that current solutions are not addressing.
  2. Consider focusing on a very specific niche within the medical field. Instead of targeting all doctors, maybe focus on oncologists, or a specific type of medical student or health issue. A narrower focus allows you to tailor the AI's knowledge and functionality to a more defined user base, potentially increasing its value and adoption.
  3. Explore the possibility of building AI tools for existing medical platforms or providers. Instead of creating a standalone AI assistant, integrate your technology into established workflows and systems. This can lower the barrier to entry and leverage existing user bases.
  4. Address trustworthiness and data reliability head-on. Given the criticism surrounding similar products, prioritize transparency and validation of data sources. Implement robust data governance and privacy measures to build trust with users, especially concerning sensitive medical information, as highlighted by concerns from 'AI for researching personal health issues.'
  5. Since the existing solutions struggle with mixed languages, ensure your interface and output are polished and professional. Consider offering multilingual support but prioritize a seamless experience in your core target languages to avoid user confusion and frustration.
  6. Pilot the AI assistant with a small group of medical professionals to gather feedback and refine its functionality. Focus on the usability and practicality of the tool in real-world scenarios. Make sure it genuinely saves them time and effort.
  7. Develop a clear and concise go-to-market strategy focused on demonstrating the unique value proposition of your AI assistant. Highlight its accuracy, reliability, and the specific problems it solves for medical professionals, students and enthusiasts.

Questions

  1. What unique data sources or algorithms will your AI assistant use to differentiate itself from existing solutions and provide genuinely novel insights?
  2. How will you ensure the AI assistant remains up-to-date with the latest medical research and guidelines, and how will you handle conflicting or controversial information?
  3. Considering the low engagement with similar products, what specific strategies will you employ to drive adoption and retain users, demonstrating tangible value in their daily workflows?

Your are here

Your idea for an AI research assistant targeting doctors, medical students, and health enthusiasts falls into a crowded space, categorized as a 'Swamp.' This means several similar solutions exist, but none have truly captured the market's love, and competition is relatively high with 7 similar products. The engagement with these existing products is low, with an average of only 2 comments per launch, suggesting that these products might not be solving a dire need. Given this context, it's crucial to understand why these previous attempts haven't fully succeeded. The absence of strong positive signals (use or buy) further reinforces the challenges you might face. Entering a 'Swamp' requires a truly differentiated approach or a pivot to a more promising direction.

Recommendations

  1. Deeply research the failures of existing AI medical research tools. Understand the specific reasons why doctors, students, and enthusiasts haven't fully adopted them. Focus on identifying unmet needs or pain points that current solutions are not addressing.
  2. Consider focusing on a very specific niche within the medical field. Instead of targeting all doctors, maybe focus on oncologists, or a specific type of medical student or health issue. A narrower focus allows you to tailor the AI's knowledge and functionality to a more defined user base, potentially increasing its value and adoption.
  3. Explore the possibility of building AI tools for existing medical platforms or providers. Instead of creating a standalone AI assistant, integrate your technology into established workflows and systems. This can lower the barrier to entry and leverage existing user bases.
  4. Address trustworthiness and data reliability head-on. Given the criticism surrounding similar products, prioritize transparency and validation of data sources. Implement robust data governance and privacy measures to build trust with users, especially concerning sensitive medical information, as highlighted by concerns from 'AI for researching personal health issues.'
  5. Since the existing solutions struggle with mixed languages, ensure your interface and output are polished and professional. Consider offering multilingual support but prioritize a seamless experience in your core target languages to avoid user confusion and frustration.
  6. Pilot the AI assistant with a small group of medical professionals to gather feedback and refine its functionality. Focus on the usability and practicality of the tool in real-world scenarios. Make sure it genuinely saves them time and effort.
  7. Develop a clear and concise go-to-market strategy focused on demonstrating the unique value proposition of your AI assistant. Highlight its accuracy, reliability, and the specific problems it solves for medical professionals, students and enthusiasts.

Questions

  1. What unique data sources or algorithms will your AI assistant use to differentiate itself from existing solutions and provide genuinely novel insights?
  2. How will you ensure the AI assistant remains up-to-date with the latest medical research and guidelines, and how will you handle conflicting or controversial information?
  3. Considering the low engagement with similar products, what specific strategies will you employ to drive adoption and retain users, demonstrating tangible value in their daily workflows?

  • Confidence: High
    • Number of similar products: 7
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 2
  • Net use signal: -10.0%
    • Positive use signal: 6.0%
    • Negative use signal: 16.0%
  • Net buy signal: -16.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 16.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Insight - Autonomous AI that can do medical research

Insight is an Autonomous Agent that can do medical research! Just put in your objective, click research, and use Insight's incredibly power interface to do medical research in minutes! (and it actually works (no really) !! )

Users are interested in the trustworthiness and reliability of the data. They find the concept of accessing medical research quickly to be impressive and inquire about the overall idea behind the product.

The primary criticism revolves around the trustworthiness and reliability of the data provided by the Product Hunt launch. Users question the validity and accuracy of the information presented, implying a need for more transparency or validation of the data sources.


Avatar
83
2
2
83
Relevance

Animus Health AI - The Advanced AI Co-Pilot For Industry Knowledge Workers

The generative AI for health professionals and organisations. Optimised for health knowledge workers and researchers. A focused, intuitive and reliable AI interface that transforms the way you work.

Excited about Animus in health sector; asks about setup/training.

Asks if there is a steep learning curve.


Avatar
8
1
100.0%
1
8
100.0%
Relevance

Insight, an autonomous AI that can do medical research

I am working on an AI that uses multiple LLM based agents to do medical research on any topic you choose! The program terminates after a set number of iterations and all of the findings are saved. Still a work in progress but it is showing some promising results imho!Would love to receive any critical and constructive feedback, collaborate, Review your PRs, or discuss your ideas!!


Avatar
7
7
Relevance

AI for researching personal health issues

I have some chronic medical conditions, and spend a lot of time asking about different drugs and supplements. Wanted to create a resource that others might get value from. It's trained to always provide citations, and to urge people to see their doctor before making major decisions. Open for feedback.

Users raised concerns about privacy policy gaps and extensive rights granted by terms. A simple prompt was found to bypass safeguards, exposing the API key. Suggestions included a preliminary check for medical requests and creating a custom GPT to avoid hacks. The service worked well but had issues with mixed languages. Questions were asked about the model, training, and weight availability. The service was praised for clear instructions and accuracy but faced demands for open-sourcing. It uses OpenAI models and APIs, with some modifications to ChatGPT.

Users criticized the Show HN product for inadequate privacy policies and data security, with specific concerns about the lack of safeguards and the risks of uploading medical information. The absence of a medical request filter and inability to respond to inappropriate queries were also noted. Additionally, users found the mixed languages on the landing page confusing and some advised open-sourcing the service. There was also a mention that people might not be forthcoming in admitting issues.


Avatar
38
12
-25.0%
-25.0%
12
38
Top