Online command line interface maker for developers using a node graph. ...

...Coding is optional

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Swamp

The market has seen several mediocre solutions that nobody loves. Unless you can offer something fundamentally different, you’ll likely struggle to stand out or make money.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.


Your are here

You're entering a market for online CLI (Command Line Interface) makers that we categorize as a 'Swamp'. This means there are already several solutions available, but none have truly captured the market's attention. With 5 similar products already out there, competition is moderate. Engagement in this space seems low, with similar products only averaging around 1 comment per product. There is no explicit positive or negative use or buy signals, which also indicates low engagement with these products. Given this landscape, simply replicating existing solutions is unlikely to yield success. To stand out, you'll need to offer something fundamentally different and address unmet needs in the developer community.

Recommendations

  1. Deeply research why existing CLI maker solutions haven't achieved widespread adoption. What are their limitations? What do developers find frustrating about them? Understanding these pain points is crucial before investing further in your idea. Leverage the criticism found in similar products and see what people are explicitly struggling with.
  2. Identify a specific niche or user group within the developer community that is particularly underserved by current CLI tools. Are you targeting web developers, data scientists, system administrators, or another specialized group? Tailoring your solution to their specific needs can give you a competitive edge.
  3. Consider offering your node graph-based CLI maker as a tool or plugin for existing CLI development platforms. Instead of competing directly, you could integrate your unique visual approach into established workflows, potentially reaching a wider audience faster. This way you are also generating revenue while learning more about the target customer, as you prepare to develop the full standalone product.
  4. Explore adjacent problems or opportunities within the developer tool space. Are there related areas where a node graph-based approach could be valuable, such as workflow automation, API integration, or data transformation? Expanding your scope might lead to a more viable product.
  5. Given the current market saturation and low engagement, carefully evaluate the potential return on investment before committing significant resources to this project. It might be wiser to focus your energy and resources on a different idea with greater market potential and less competition.
  6. Prioritize usability and user experience. Based on feedback from similar products, ensure your website and product interface are intuitive and easy to navigate. Make contact information and support resources readily accessible.
  7. Since your idea involves a node graph interface, focus on making the visual representation clear and efficient. Developers should be able to quickly understand and manipulate the CLI logic represented by the graph. Consider various layout algorithms and visual cues to enhance readability.

Questions

  1. What unique capabilities does your node graph-based approach offer compared to existing CLI maker solutions that rely on traditional coding or scripting? How does it simplify CLI creation for developers, and what specific problems does it solve more effectively?
  2. Given the low engagement observed in similar products, what innovative strategies will you employ to generate interest and attract early adopters for your CLI maker? How will you build a community around your tool and gather feedback for continuous improvement?
  3. How will you validate your core assumptions about developer needs and preferences before committing significant resources to building out the full product? What are your key hypotheses, and how will you design experiments to test them quickly and efficiently?

Your are here

You're entering a market for online CLI (Command Line Interface) makers that we categorize as a 'Swamp'. This means there are already several solutions available, but none have truly captured the market's attention. With 5 similar products already out there, competition is moderate. Engagement in this space seems low, with similar products only averaging around 1 comment per product. There is no explicit positive or negative use or buy signals, which also indicates low engagement with these products. Given this landscape, simply replicating existing solutions is unlikely to yield success. To stand out, you'll need to offer something fundamentally different and address unmet needs in the developer community.

Recommendations

  1. Deeply research why existing CLI maker solutions haven't achieved widespread adoption. What are their limitations? What do developers find frustrating about them? Understanding these pain points is crucial before investing further in your idea. Leverage the criticism found in similar products and see what people are explicitly struggling with.
  2. Identify a specific niche or user group within the developer community that is particularly underserved by current CLI tools. Are you targeting web developers, data scientists, system administrators, or another specialized group? Tailoring your solution to their specific needs can give you a competitive edge.
  3. Consider offering your node graph-based CLI maker as a tool or plugin for existing CLI development platforms. Instead of competing directly, you could integrate your unique visual approach into established workflows, potentially reaching a wider audience faster. This way you are also generating revenue while learning more about the target customer, as you prepare to develop the full standalone product.
  4. Explore adjacent problems or opportunities within the developer tool space. Are there related areas where a node graph-based approach could be valuable, such as workflow automation, API integration, or data transformation? Expanding your scope might lead to a more viable product.
  5. Given the current market saturation and low engagement, carefully evaluate the potential return on investment before committing significant resources to this project. It might be wiser to focus your energy and resources on a different idea with greater market potential and less competition.
  6. Prioritize usability and user experience. Based on feedback from similar products, ensure your website and product interface are intuitive and easy to navigate. Make contact information and support resources readily accessible.
  7. Since your idea involves a node graph interface, focus on making the visual representation clear and efficient. Developers should be able to quickly understand and manipulate the CLI logic represented by the graph. Consider various layout algorithms and visual cues to enhance readability.

Questions

  1. What unique capabilities does your node graph-based approach offer compared to existing CLI maker solutions that rely on traditional coding or scripting? How does it simplify CLI creation for developers, and what specific problems does it solve more effectively?
  2. Given the low engagement observed in similar products, what innovative strategies will you employ to generate interest and attract early adopters for your CLI maker? How will you build a community around your tool and gather feedback for continuous improvement?
  3. How will you validate your core assumptions about developer needs and preferences before committing significant resources to building out the full product? What are your key hypotheses, and how will you design experiments to test them quickly and efficiently?

  • Confidence: Medium
    • Number of similar products: 5
  • Engagement: Low
    • Average number of comments: 1
  • Net use signal: 18.0%
    • Positive use signal: 18.0%
    • Negative use signal: 0.0%
  • Net buy signal: 0.0%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 0.0%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Bashnode - Build code-free custom CLIs

Bashnode is a terminal tool builder that aims to make developers and enterprises gain time and effeciency by removing the need for complex and single-use bash scripts. Easily build a no-code custom command line interface to suit your needs.

Bashnode's launch is congratulated, with users praising its simplification of CLI customization for developers. Positive feedback is given regarding the project and website design. There's an expression of good luck and a wish for customer acquisition.


Avatar
121
3
3
121
Relevance

No-code CLI script builder

02 Sep 2024 GitHub Developer Tools

Dev for proggy.io here.Why I built this: I occasionally find the need to build CLI scripts. Whether it be for resetting variables, performing some mundane task, it seemed to involve the same process of trial and error. I wondered if it would be possible to create some sort of reusable blocks and design my CLI program with a web UI. This way, anyone on my team could modify it who weren't comfortable touching bash scripts or just wanted something where they could clone and tinker for their own needs easily.Be happy to answer any questions!

Proggy.io is a platform for reusable CLI scripts with a web UI. A user expressed interest in collaborating on a web UI project.

Users find it difficult to locate the contact link on the site, indicating a need for better visibility or placement of this feature.


Avatar
3
2
50.0%
2
3
50.0%
Relevance

New set of Go libraries for CLI Development

Hello everyone,I've just released three different libraries aimed at either enhancing or facilitating CLI application development.Flags (https://github.com/reeflective/flags) flags aims to merge the concepts from https://github.com/jessevdk/go-flags, and https://github.com/octago/sflags, both relying on struct tags to define CLI command specs. The flags library uses these underlying concepts to produce complete `cobra.Command` trees, and brings many comfort-of-life improvements for the generated applications/commands.Console (https://github.com/reeflective/console) This library wraps the readline library (described below) and leverages cobra commands in order to provide a closed-loop console working with cobra commands out of the box, also providing many comfort-of-life features at minimum cost, like support for oh-my-posh prompt engines, different menus and much more.Readline (https://github.com/reeflective/readline) Readline libraries in pure Go already exist, and the chzyer/readline one is widely used. However they might lack some features, or even a full-fledged Emacs/Vim edition mode. Most of them lack many UI features found in common shells. Readline has been written to bring a new shell library with features found in most recent shells, with a simple API for developpers.All of these projects each come with a complete documentation for developers, (and for readline, users as well). Advertising those in the hope that they might be useful to some.


Avatar
2
2
Top