17 Apr 2025
Hiring

skilled based matching and based on a niche for people who don't have ...

...linkedin

Confidence
Engagement
Net use signal
Net buy signal

Idea type: Run Away

Multiple attempts have failed with clear negative feedback. Continuing down this path would likely waste your time and resources when better opportunities exist elsewhere.

Should You Build It?

Don't build it.


Your are here

Your idea of a skills-based matching platform, particularly for those seeking an alternative to LinkedIn, places you in a challenging space. The "Run Away" category suggests that similar ideas have faced significant hurdles. While there are a few comparable products (n_matches=3), indicating some validation, it also means that you're not alone in this space, and you'll face competition. The existing products have garnered relatively high engagement (avg n_comments=12), suggesting that there's an interest in the general idea, but the lack of any net positive use or buy signals is concerning, suggesting that people aren't finding enough value in existing solutions to actively use or pay for them. The criticism and discussions of those similar products suggest spam and privacy issues. Given the challenges and negative feedback associated with comparable products, it's crucial to tread carefully and thoroughly re-evaluate the approach and execution.

Recommendations

  1. Carefully review the negative comments from similar products, especially concerning spam, onboarding length, data privacy, and unclear value proposition. Understanding these pain points is crucial for differentiating your platform and avoiding the same pitfalls. The discussions around LinkedIn dependency, user base confusion, and sign-up issues are particularly insightful.
  2. Consider pivoting your skills and focusing on a specific niche within the broader professional networking space. Instead of competing directly with LinkedIn, identify underserved users or a specific industry that could benefit from a more tailored matching approach. Focus on that niche and make sure that onboarding is short and non-intrusive.
  3. Instead of building out the full matching platform see if you can validate the problem in your target niche via a series of manual 1:1 intros. This will allow you to learn about user needs and get feedback more quickly. If the feedback from your users is positive, that is when you should start automating it!
  4. Conduct in-depth interviews with at least three individuals who have tried similar platforms, focusing on their frustrations, unmet needs, and desired features. What is the core problem they are trying to solve with this "matching" and how could you solve this core need in a more organic way?
  5. Before investing significant resources, focus on building a minimal viable product (MVP) that addresses the core pain points identified in your research. Start with a single, well-defined use case and iterate based on user feedback. Don't try to be everything to everyone early on.
  6. Develop a clear and compelling value proposition that resonates with your target audience. Explain precisely how your platform solves their specific problems and why it's different from existing solutions, particularly LinkedIn. Address the privacy and spam concerns that surfaced in similar product discussions.
  7. Prioritize a seamless and user-friendly onboarding process to minimize friction. Address any technical issues, such as SSL certificate mismatches or sign-up problems, promptly. Strive for a simple, clear signup process and DO NOT require a LinkedIn account in the beginning.
  8. Implement robust data privacy measures and clearly communicate your data usage policies to build trust with your users. Emphasize your commitment to ethical practices and avoid misleading use of logos or intrusive pop-ups, as these issues were flagged in the competitive analysis.

Questions

  1. Given the criticisms surrounding LinkedIn dependency and data privacy in similar platforms, how can you build a skills-based matching system that respects user privacy and doesn't rely on existing social networks?
  2. The 'Run Away' category suggests significant challenges. What is the one key aspect of your platform that will demonstrably solve a problem better than existing solutions, addressing the core reasons why similar products failed to gain traction?
  3. Considering the concerns about unclear user base and purpose in similar networking tools, how will you define and target a specific niche, ensuring your platform's value proposition resonates strongly with that audience, and how can you measure that resonance?

Your are here

Your idea of a skills-based matching platform, particularly for those seeking an alternative to LinkedIn, places you in a challenging space. The "Run Away" category suggests that similar ideas have faced significant hurdles. While there are a few comparable products (n_matches=3), indicating some validation, it also means that you're not alone in this space, and you'll face competition. The existing products have garnered relatively high engagement (avg n_comments=12), suggesting that there's an interest in the general idea, but the lack of any net positive use or buy signals is concerning, suggesting that people aren't finding enough value in existing solutions to actively use or pay for them. The criticism and discussions of those similar products suggest spam and privacy issues. Given the challenges and negative feedback associated with comparable products, it's crucial to tread carefully and thoroughly re-evaluate the approach and execution.

Recommendations

  1. Carefully review the negative comments from similar products, especially concerning spam, onboarding length, data privacy, and unclear value proposition. Understanding these pain points is crucial for differentiating your platform and avoiding the same pitfalls. The discussions around LinkedIn dependency, user base confusion, and sign-up issues are particularly insightful.
  2. Consider pivoting your skills and focusing on a specific niche within the broader professional networking space. Instead of competing directly with LinkedIn, identify underserved users or a specific industry that could benefit from a more tailored matching approach. Focus on that niche and make sure that onboarding is short and non-intrusive.
  3. Instead of building out the full matching platform see if you can validate the problem in your target niche via a series of manual 1:1 intros. This will allow you to learn about user needs and get feedback more quickly. If the feedback from your users is positive, that is when you should start automating it!
  4. Conduct in-depth interviews with at least three individuals who have tried similar platforms, focusing on their frustrations, unmet needs, and desired features. What is the core problem they are trying to solve with this "matching" and how could you solve this core need in a more organic way?
  5. Before investing significant resources, focus on building a minimal viable product (MVP) that addresses the core pain points identified in your research. Start with a single, well-defined use case and iterate based on user feedback. Don't try to be everything to everyone early on.
  6. Develop a clear and compelling value proposition that resonates with your target audience. Explain precisely how your platform solves their specific problems and why it's different from existing solutions, particularly LinkedIn. Address the privacy and spam concerns that surfaced in similar product discussions.
  7. Prioritize a seamless and user-friendly onboarding process to minimize friction. Address any technical issues, such as SSL certificate mismatches or sign-up problems, promptly. Strive for a simple, clear signup process and DO NOT require a LinkedIn account in the beginning.
  8. Implement robust data privacy measures and clearly communicate your data usage policies to build trust with your users. Emphasize your commitment to ethical practices and avoid misleading use of logos or intrusive pop-ups, as these issues were flagged in the competitive analysis.

Questions

  1. Given the criticisms surrounding LinkedIn dependency and data privacy in similar platforms, how can you build a skills-based matching system that respects user privacy and doesn't rely on existing social networks?
  2. The 'Run Away' category suggests significant challenges. What is the one key aspect of your platform that will demonstrably solve a problem better than existing solutions, addressing the core reasons why similar products failed to gain traction?
  3. Considering the concerns about unclear user base and purpose in similar networking tools, how will you define and target a specific niche, ensuring your platform's value proposition resonates strongly with that audience, and how can you measure that resonance?

  • Confidence: Medium
    • Number of similar products: 3
  • Engagement: High
    • Average number of comments: 12
  • Net use signal: -19.0%
    • Positive use signal: 3.1%
    • Negative use signal: 22.1%
  • Net buy signal: -10.8%
    • Positive buy signal: 0.0%
    • Negative buy signal: 10.8%

This chart summarizes all the similar products we found for your idea in a single plot.

The x-axis represents the overall feedback each product received. This is calculated from the net use and buy signals that were expressed in the comments. The maximum is +1, which means all comments (across all similar products) were positive, expressed a willingness to use & buy said product. The minimum is -1 and it means the exact opposite.

The y-axis captures the strength of the signal, i.e. how many people commented and how does this rank against other products in this category. The maximum is +1, which means these products were the most liked, upvoted and talked about launches recently. The minimum is 0, meaning zero engagement or feedback was received.

The sizes of the product dots are determined by the relevance to your idea, where 10 is the maximum.

Your idea is the big blueish dot, which should lie somewhere in the polygon defined by these products. It can be off-center because we use custom weighting to summarize these metrics.

Similar products

Relevance

Meet: Combining LinkedIn and Tinder, swipe to build connections

12 Jul 2024 Dating

Users appreciate the concept and aesthetics, but critique onboarding length and a typo. There's interest in product creation details and humorous engagement, with one comment making a light-hearted remark about cake.

Users have noted a typo ('educaiton') in an image, complained about an excessively long onboarding process, reported an SSL certificate mismatch issue, and expressed dissatisfaction with the use of sarcasm related to swiping features.


Avatar
12
6
-16.7%
6
12
Relevance

My first web app, ExpertRank – LinkedIn but less social, more discovery

17 Apr 2024 Social Networking

Hey HN!I started coding about two months ago in mid-Feb and would love some feedback on my first web app – ExpertRank: https://www.expertrank.ioI’ve been thinking about how LinkedIn is great for social professional networking but not so much for quietly discovering real experts and talent through people you trust, so thought it would be a great first project to start with.ExpertRank allows you to privately endorse the skills of people you know, and discover experts based on the opinions of those you trust. I’d love to get your take on this. What do you like about it? What’s not working? Any glaring issues or suggestions for improvements?Also as I’m new to coding, if you have any quick technical tips or see obvious areas for improvement in the app's build, I’d appreciate that insight as well!I know HN isn’t big on sign-ups for feedback (but the login was one of the first things I did) so feel free to use a throwaway email to create a dummy account if that makes you more comfortable :)Really appreciate any feedback you can throw my way. Thanks a bunch!

Seeking feedback on first web app, ExpertRank.

None provided.


Avatar
1
1
1
1
Relevance

I built a tool to expand your network (that introverts will love)

23 Jul 2024 Social Networking

As someone who struggles with social anxiety, expanding my network through traditional means has always been challenging. I found existing networking apps either too spammy (LinkedIn) or too much like professional dating (Bumble Bizz), and they just didn’t work for me.About a year ago, I developed a matching system for a local startup accelerator. This system connected founders, mentors, and investors based on industries, skills, and job functions, facilitating over 5,000 meetings that led to some amazing outcomes. Inspired by this success, I enhanced the system to focus on email introductions. Here’s how it works: - It analyzes backgrounds and interests. - It sends intro proposals to each person. - If both respond, it makes the intro.My goal is to help people meet interesting contacts without the stress, using email to keep the process simple and integrated into daily routines. I’d love for you to try it out and share your feedback. Your thoughts and suggestions for improvement are greatly appreciated!

Users appreciate the design but are confused about the target user base and the purpose of the product. There are concerns about the requirement of a LinkedIn account, which some find intrusive and spammy. Several users have had sign-up issues, particularly on Firefox, and there are requests for user success stories and clearer data usage policies. The concept of networking for HackerNews users is intriguing to some, but there is skepticism about social validation without proof of product usage. A few users are excited to try the product, while others suggest improvements like manual vetting to avoid spam.

Users criticized the product for unclear user base and purpose, spam issues, and data privacy concerns. The sign-up process is problematic, with LinkedIn dependency and account setup issues. There's skepticism about the effectiveness of recommendation systems and the validity of trends like Gen Z dating discomfort. The product's networking scope and benefits are unclear, and there are complaints about unethical practices, misleading use of logos, and intrusive popups.


Avatar
229
32
-34.4%
-21.9%
32
229
6.2%
Top